Abdominal rectopexy has been advocated as the treatment of choice for complete rectal prolapse. Recurrence rates are low raging from 0–12% and fecal continence has been documented to improve in 3–75% of patients. As most patients are elderly and not always fit enough to undergo abdominal procedure, various perineal approaches have been advocated. Depending on the type and extent of the operation, these procedures have a recurrence of up to 38%. Laparoscopic rectopexy represents the latest development in the evolution of surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. This technique aims to combine the good functional outcome of the open abdominal procedure with the low postoperative morbidity of minimal invasive surgery. We present a laparosocpic rectopexy on 72-year-old lady with a 10-year history of fecal incontinence and mucosal rectal prolapse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Ashari LH, Lumley JW, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW (2005) Laparoscopically assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: ten years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 982–987
Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Casillas S, Hammel J, Nocero J, Bast J, Brady K, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ (2006) Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 20: 35–42
Karulf RE, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM (2001) Rectal prolapse. Curr Probl Surg 38: 771–832
Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD (2005) Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 140: 63–73
Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Paraskevas P, Ziprin P, Darzi A (2005) A comparison of open vs laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 1930–1940
Senagore AJ (2003) Management of rectal prolapse: the role of laparoscopic approaches. Semin Laparosc Surg 10: 197–202
About this article
Cite this article
Nunoo-Mensah, J.W., Efron, J.E. & Young-Fadok, T.M. Laparoscopic rectopexy. Surg Endosc 21, 325–326 (2007) doi:10.1007/s00464-006-0136-y
- Rectal prolapse