Advertisement

Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration

  • S. Lyass
  • E. H. PhillipsEmail author
Article

Abstract

The modern era of common bile duct (CBD) surgery started with Mirizzi, who introduced intraoperative cholangiography in 1932. Intraoperative choledoscopy had been developed as an adjunctive to intraoperative cholangiography, which helped to detect CBD stones in an additional 10% to 15% of instances that otherwise would have been missed. Findings have shown choledochoscopy to be an important technique for efficient and effective management of CBD stones. Efforts to treat patients with common duct stones in one session and to avoid the potential complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy resulted in several laparoscopic transcystic CBD (LTCBDE) techniques. The techniques of transcystic stone extraction include lavage, trolling with wire baskets or biliary balloon catheters, cystic duct dilation, biliary endoscopy, and stone retrieval with wire baskets under direct vision and antegrade sphincterotomy, lithotripsy, and catheter techniques. The indications for LTCBDE are filling or equivocal defects at cholangiography, stones smaller than 10 mm, fewer than 9 stones, and possible tumor. The contraindications are stones larger than 1 cm, stones proximal to the cystic duct entrance into the CBD, small friable cystic duct, and 10 or more stones. Experience with LTCBDE shows that the approach is applicable in more than 85% of cases, with a success rate of 85% to 95%. It also is shown to be more cost effective than postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Recent developments in LTCBDE have focused mainly on implementation of robotically assisted surgery and new imaging methods such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional virtual cholangioscopy and three-dimensional ultrasound. Further technological advances will facilitate the application of laparoscopic approaches to the common duct, which should become the primary strategy for the great majority of patients.

Keywords

Intraoperative cholangiography Intraoperative choledoscopy Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration Transcystic stone extraction 

References

  1. 1.
    Beal JM (1984) Historical perspective of gallstone disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet 158: 181–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berci G, Morgenstern L (1994) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: a multiinstitutional SAGES study. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (see comment). Surg Endosc 8: 1168–1174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berci G, Morgenstern L, Paz-Partlow M (1989) Intraoperative and postoperative biliary endoscopy (choledochoscopy): the role of the surgeons. Am Surg 55: 267–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berci G, Morgenstern L, Paz-Partlow M (1988) The impact of electronic imaging in intraoperative biliary endoscopy (choledochoscopy). Surg Endosc 2: 167–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berci G, Shore M, Morgenstern L, Hamlin A (1978) Choledochoscopy and operative fluorocholangiography in the prevention of retained bile duct stones. World J Surg 2: 411–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caratozzolo E, Recordare A, Massani M, Bonariol L, Jelmoni A, Antoniutti M, Bassi N (2005) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our experience on 29 patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surg 12: 163–166Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carroll BJ, Phillips EH, Rosenthal R, Liberman M, Fallas M (1996) Update on transcystic exploration of the bile duct. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6: 453–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Curet MJ, Pitcher DE, Martin DT, Zucker KA (1995) Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy: a new technique for the management of complex choledocholithiasis (see comment). Ann Surg 221: 149–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Bafutto M (1994) Laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 8: 1399–1403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Bafutto M, Zago R, Machado MM (1993) Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 157–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feliciano DV, Mattox KL, Jordan GL Jr (1980) The value of choledochoscopy in exploration of the common bile duct. Ann Surg 191: 649–654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Ryberg AA, Ulualp KM, Nguyen NX, Litke BS, Camps J, McGinn TR, Jenkins JX, Filipi CJ (1995) An alternative technique for treatment of choledocholithiasis found at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 130: 638–642PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fletcher DR (1994) Changes in the practice of biliary surgery and ERCP during the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to Australia: their possible significance. Aust N Z J Surg 64: 75–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Fennerty MB, DiSario JA, Ryan ME, Kortan PP, Dorsher PJ, Shaw MJ, Herman ME, Cunningham JT, Moore JP, Silverman WB, Imperial JC, Mackie RD, Jamidar PA, Yakshe PN, Logan GM, Pheley AM (1999) Same-day discharge after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: observations from a prospective multicenter complication study. The Multicenter Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (MESH) Study Group (see comment). Gastrointest Endosc 49: 580–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giurgiu DI, Margulies DR, Carroll BJ, Gabbay J, Lida A, Takagi S, Fallas MJ, Phillips EH (1999) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: long-term outcome. Arch Surg 134: 839–843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hattori A, Suzuki N, Hashizume M, Akahoshi T, Konishi K, Yamaguchi S, Shimada M, Hayashibe M (2003) A robotic surgery system (da Vinci) with image-guided function: system architecture and cholecystectomy application. Studies Health Technol Informatics 94: 110–116Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hazey JW, Melvin WS (2004) Robot-assisted general surgery (Review, 29 refs). Semin Laparosc Surg 11: 107–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morgenstern L, Wong L, Berci G (1992) Twelve hundred open cholecystectomies before the laparoscopic era: a standard for comparison. Arch Surg 127: 400–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Finley D, Stevens M, Paya M (2004) Application of robotics in general surgery: initial experience. Am Surg 70: 914–917PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nio D, Bemelman WA, Busch OR, Vrouenraets BC, Gouma BJ (2004) Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 18: 379–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Paganini AM, Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Tamburini A, De Sanctis A, Campagnacci R, Lezoche E (2001) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (see comment). J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn Part A 11: 391–400Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petelin JB (1993) Clinical results of common bile duct exploration. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1: 125–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petelin JB (2003) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (review, 80 refs). Surg Endosc 17: 1705–1715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Phillips EH, Rosenthal RJ, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ (1994) Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 8: 1389–1393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rao AV, Champine JG, Forte TB, Brewington CC (2003) Three-dimensional sonographic evaluation of the common bile duct. J Ultrasound Med 22: 939–944PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rattner DW, Warshaw AL (1981) Impact of choledochoscopy on the management of choledocholithiasis: experience with 499 common duct explorations at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Ann Surg 194: 76–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rhodes M, Nathanson L, O’Rourke N, Fielding G (1995) Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: lessons learned from 129 consecutive cases. Br J Surg 82: 666–668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Simone M, Mutter D, Rubino F, Dutson E, Roy C, Soler L, Marescaux J (2004) Three-dimensional virtual cholangioscopy: a reliable tool for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 240: 82–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Traverso LW (2000) A cost analysis of the treatment of common bile duct stones discovered during cholecystectomy. Semin Laparosc Surg 7: 302–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Jobe BA, Standage BA, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL (2001) Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 15: 4–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wood T, Macfadyen BV Jr (2000) Diagnostic and therapeutic choledochoscopy (review, 40 refs). Semin Laparosc Surg 7: 288–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Center for Minimally Invasive SurgeryLos AngelesUS

Personalised recommendations