The nature of surgical error A cautionary tale and a call to reason
- 91 Downloads
Errors and “patient safety” have taken on monumental importance for surgery. Like all things new, there is an initial over-reaction before a return to a balanced perspective. The current response to the global interest in error has been to seize on the latest reports that are focusing on the “systemic nature” of errors, which is also being referred to as “the new look.” There has been an unintentional ignoring of the actual error, referred to as the coface error, that the surgeon commits. It is time to put the approach to errors into perspective and redefine errors within the context of the surgical community, which can result in a balance of the surgeon’s position in regard to systemic and personal responsibility.
KeywordsCommon Bile Duct Cystic Duct Bile Duct Injury Latent Error Hippocratic Oath
- 1.Billings CE, Woods DD (2001) Human error in perspective. The patient safety movement. Postgrad Med 109: 13–17Google Scholar
- 3.Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds) (1999) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 4.Reason JT (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- 6.Woods DD, Cook RI (2003) Mistaking error. In: Hatlie MJ, Youngberg BJ (eds) Patient safety handbook Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury, MAGoogle Scholar