Advertisement

Impact of prior surgery on the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for children: a prospective study

  • M. L. Metzelder
  • N. Jesch
  • A. Dick
  • J. Kuebler
  • C. Petersen
  • B. M. Ure
Article

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to determine the impact of prior surgery on the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for children.

Methods

A prospective study analyzed 471 consecutive children who underwent laparoscopic surgery over a 4-year period. Laparoscopic procedures were classified “easy,” “difficult,” or “demanding.” The end points of the study were conversion rate, intraoperative events, and duration of operation.

Results

A total of 89 patients (19%) had undergone previous abdominal surgery. The conversion rate was 18% for the patients with prior surgery versus 9% for those without a prior operation (16/89 vs 35/382; p < 0.05). This difference reflects a significantly higher conversion rate for “easy” procedures among patients with than among those without prior surgery, but not for “difficult” and “demanding” procedures. The type of prior surgery had no significant impact on the mean duration of the operation. Of 71 procedures, 12 (17%) after prior conventional surgery were converted, as compared with 4 (22%) of 18 after prior laparoscopy (p > 0.05). Intraoperative events, mainly attributable to adhesions and lack of overview, occurred in 8% of patients with prior procedures, as compared with 2% without former surgery (7/89 vs 9/382; p < 0.05). Relevant complications were not significantly more frequent after prior surgery. The incidence of conversions decreased with increased time between current and previous surgery. It was 64% for surgeries less than 1 year later, 25% for surgeries 1 to 5 years later, and 5% for surgeries more than 5 years later (7/11 vs 6/24 vs 3/54; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Prior surgery has a limited impact on the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for children. The conversion rate and the incidence of intraoperative events, mainly because of adhesions and lack of overviewing, is increased, but not the incidence of relevant complications. The feasibility improves considerably with increased time between surgery and prior surgery. The authors consider laparoscopy to be the first-choice technique after prior surgery.

Keywords

Feasibility Pediatric laparoscopic surgery Prior surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Borzellino G, Tasselli S, Zerman G, Pedrazzani C, Manzoni G (1994) Laparoscopic approach to postoperative adhesive obstruction. Surg Endosc 18: 686–690Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Costi R, Denet C, Sarli L, Perniceni T, Roncoroni L, Gayet B (2003) Laparoscopy in the last decade of the millennium. Surg Endosc 17: 791–797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davenport M (2003) Laparoscopic surgery in children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85: 324–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diaz DM, Gibbons TE, Heiss K, Wulkan ML, Ricketts RR, Gold BD (2005) Antireflux surgery outcomes in pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 1844–1852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Esposito C, Becmeur F, Centonze A, Settimi A, Amici G, Montupet P (2002) Laparoscopic reoperation following unsuccessful antireflux surgery in childhood. Semin Laparosc Surg 9: 177–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harrell WB, Snow BW (2005) Minimally invasive pediatric nephrectomy. Curr Opin Urol 15: 277–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (2005) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int 95: 102–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iwanaka T, Arai M, Kawashima H, Kudou S, Fujishiro J, Imaizumi S, Yamamoto K, Hanada R, Kikuchi A, Aihara T, Kishimoto H (2004) Endosurgical procedures for pediatric solid tumors. Pediatr Surg Int 20: 39–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kang KJ, Lim TJ, Kim YS (2000) Laparoscopic appendicectomy is feasible for the complicated appendicitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10: 364–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karplus G, Kleiner O, Newman N, Finaly R, Mordehai J, Avinoah E, Cohen Z (2005) Twelve years of minimally invasive surgery in children and adolescents: a single center experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15: 419–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peters CA (2004) Laparoscopy in pediatric urology. Curr Opin Urol 14: 67–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rothenberg SS (2005) The first decade’s experience with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 40: 142–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sandoval C, Strom K, Stringel G (2004) Laparoscopy in the management of pediatric intraabdominal tumors. JSLS 8: 115–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Laparoscopic approach to small intestinal obstruction in children: a preliminary experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11: 301–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spurbeck WW, Davidoff AM, Lobe TE, Rao BN, Schropp KP, Shochat SJ (2004) Minimally invasive surgery in pediatric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 11: 340–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Swank DJ, Bonjer KJ, Jeekel J (2002) Safe laparoscopic adhesiolysis with optical access trocar and ultrasonic dissection: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 16: 1796–1801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tan HL, Shankar KR, Ford WD (2003) Laparoscopic resection of type I choledochal cyst. Surg Endosc 17: 1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tan S, Wulkan ML (2002) Minimally invasive surgical techniques in reoperative surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants and children. Am Surg 68: 989–992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ure BM, Bax NM, van der Zee DC (2000) Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery. J Pediatr Surg 35: 1170–1173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ure BM, Schier F, Schmidt AI, Nustede R, Petersen C, Jesch NK (2005) Laparoscopic resection of congenital choledochal cyst, choledochojejunostomy, and extraabdominal Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Surg Endosc 19: 1055–1057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    van der Zee DC, Bax NM, Ure BM (2000) Laparoscopic refundoplication in children. Surg Endosc 14: 1103–1104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vegunta RK, Ali A, Wallace LJ, Switzer DM, Pearl RH (204) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: technically feasible and safe in all stages of acute appendicitis. Am Surg 70: 198–201Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zitsman JL (2003) Current concepts in minimal access surgery for children. Pediatrics 111: 1239–1252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. L. Metzelder
    • 1
  • N. Jesch
    • 1
  • A. Dick
    • 1
  • J. Kuebler
    • 1
  • C. Petersen
    • 1
  • B. M. Ure
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations