Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective study




An incisional hernia develops in 3% to 13% of laparotomy incisions, with primary suture repair of ventral hernias yielding unsatisfactory results. The introduction of a prosthetic mesh to ensure abdominal wall strength without tension has decreased the recurrence rate, but open repair requires significant soft tissue dissection in tissues that are already of poor quality as well as flap creation, increasing complication rates and affecting the recurrence rate. A minimally invasive approach was applied to the repair pf ventral hernias, with the expectation of earlier recovery, fewer postoperative complications, and decreased recurrence rates. This prospective study was performed to objectively analyze and compare the outcomes after open and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.


The outcomes for 50 unselected patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were compared with those for 50 consecutive unselected patients who underwent open repair. The open surgical operations were performed by the Rives and Stoppa technique using prosthetic mesh, whereas the laparoscopic repairs were performed using the intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair technique in all cases.


The study group consisted of 100 patients (82 women and 18 men) with a mean age of 55.25 years (range, 30–83 years). The patients in the two groups were comparable at baseline in terms of sex, presenting complaints, and comorbid conditions. The patients in laparoscopic group had larger defects (93.96 vs 55.88 cm2; p = 0.0023). The mean follow-up time was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.5640–23.0227 months). The mean surgery durations were 90.6 min for the laparoscopic repair and 93.3 min for the open repair (p = 0.769, nonsignificant difference). The mean postoperative stay was shorter for the laparoscopic group than for the open hernia group (2.7 vs 4.7 days; p = 0.044). The pain scores were similar in the two groups at 24 and 48 h, but significantly less at 72 h in the laparoscopic group (mean visual analog scale score, 2.9412 vs 4.1702; p = 0.001). There were fewer complications (24%) and recurrences (2%) among the patients who underwent laparoscopic repair than among those who had open repair (30% and 10%, respectively).


The findings demonstrate that laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in our experience was safe and resulted in shorter operative time, fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and less recurrence. Hence, it should be considered as the procedure of choice for ventral hernia repair.


Comparative study Hernia mesh repair Incisional hernia Laparoscopic surgery Open surgery Ventral hernia 


  1. 1.
    Bauer JJ, Harris MT, Kreel I, Gelernt IM (1999) Twelve-year experience with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in the repair of abdominal wall defects. Mt Sinai J Med 66: 20–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bencini L, Sanchez J, Bo B, Farsi M, Scatizzi M, Moretti R (2003) Incisional hernia repair: retrospective comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. Surg Endosc 17: 1546–1551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carbajo MA, Martý´n del Olmo JC, Blanco JI, de la Cuesta C, Toledano M, Martin M, Vaquero C, Inglada L (1999) Laparoscopic treatment vs open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh. Surg Endosc 13: 250–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chowbey PK, Sharma A, Khullar R, Baijal M, Vashistha A (2000) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10: 79–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costanza MJ, Heniford BT, Arca MJ, Mayes JT, Gagner M (1998) Laparoscopic repair of recurrent ventral hernia. Am Surg 64: 1121–1127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Glass JL, Manjarrez A (2004) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: an 11-year experience. Hernia 8: 23–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238: 391–399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2000) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients. J Am Coll Surg 190: 645–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hesselink VJ, Luijendijk RW, deWilt JHW, et al. (1993) An evaluation of risk factors in incisional hernia recurrence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176: 228–234 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holzman MD, Purut CM, Reintgen K, et al. (1997) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 11: 32–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koller R, Miholic J, Jalk RJ (1997) Repair of incisional hernias with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Eur J Surg 163: 261–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leber GE, Garb JL, Albert AI, Reed WP (1998) Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg 132: 1141–1144Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 39–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    LeBlanc KA, Booth WV, Whitaker JM, Bellanger DE (2000) Laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorraphy in 100 Patients. Am J Surg 180: 193–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leblanc KA, Booth WV, Whitaker JM, Bellanger DE (2001) Laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorrhaphy: our initial 100 patients. Hernia 5: 41–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW (2002) Enterocolocutaneous fistula: a late consequence of polypropylene mesh abdominal wall repair: case report and review of the literature. Hernia 6: 144–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miller K, Junger W (1997) Ileocutaneous fistula formation following laparoscopic polypropylene mesh Surg Endosc 11: 772–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10-year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72: 70–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park A, Birch DW, Lovrics P (1998) Laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a comparison study. Surgery 124: 816–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park A, Gagner M, Pomp A (1996) Laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6: 123–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramshaw BJ, Esartia P, Schwab J, Mason EM, Wilson RA, Duncan TD, Miller J, Lucas GW, Promes J (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy. Am Surg 65: 827–831PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rives J, Pire JC, Flament JB, Palot JP, Body C (1985) Treatment of large eventrations: new therapeutic indications apropos of 322 cases. Chirurgie 111: 215–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stoppa RE (1989) The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg 13: 545–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wantz GE (1991) Incisional hernioplasty with Mersilene. Surg Gynecol Obstet 172: 129–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    White TJ, Santos MC, Thompson JS (1998) Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias. Am Surg 64: 276–280PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Lomanto
    • 1
  • S.G. Iyer
    • 1
  • A. Shabbir
    • 1
  • W.-K. Cheah
    • 1
  1. 1.Minimally Invasive Surgical Centre, Department of SurgeryNational University HospitalSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations