Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly used for postoperative evaluation of an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC). Although a normal IOC is very suggestive of a disease-free common bile duct (CBD), abnormal studies are associated with high false-positive rates. This study aimed to identify a subset of patients with abnormal IOC who would benefit from a postoperative ERCP.
This prospective study investigated 51 patients with abnormal IOC at laparoscopic cholecystectomy who underwent postoperative ERCP at two tertiary referral centers over a 3-year period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of CBD stones at postoperative ERCP.
For all 51 patients, ERCP was successful. The ERCP showed CBD stones in 33 cases (64.7%), and normal results in 18 cases (35.2%). On univariate analysis, abnormal liver function tests (p < 0.0001) as well as IOC findings of a large CBD stone (p = 0.03), multiple stones (p = 0.01), and a dilated CBD (p = 0.07) predicted the presence of retained stones at postoperative ERCP. However, on multivariable analysis, only abnormal liver function tests correlated with the presence of CBD stones (p < 0.0001).
One-third of patients with an abnormal IOC have a normal postoperative ERCP. Elevated liver function tests can help to identify patients who merit further evaluation by ERCP. The use of less invasive methods such as endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography should be considered for patients with normal liver function tests to minimize unnecessary ERCPs.
KeywordsAbnormal intraoperative cholangiogram CBD Common bile duct Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ERCP IOC Predictors
- 2.Arregui M, Davis CJ, Arkush AM, Nagan RF (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 6: 10–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Besten LD, Doty JE (1981) Choledocholithiasis. Surg Clin North Am 61: 893–907Google Scholar
- 7.Cohen S, Bacon BR, Berlin JA, Fleischer D, Hecht GA, Loehrer PJ, Sr, McNair AE Jr, Mulholland M, Norton NJ, Rabeneck L, Ransohoff DF, Sonnenberg A, Vannier MW. (2002) National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 56: 802–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hainsworth PJ, Rhodes M, Gompertz RH, Armstrong CP, Lennard TW (1994) Imaging of the common bile duct in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut 7: 991–995Google Scholar
- 21.Legorreta A, Brooks RJ, Staroscik RN, Xuan Y, Costantino GN, Zats S (1995) Increased ERCP rate following the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparaendosc Surg 5: 271–278Google Scholar
- 30.Palazzo L, Girollet P-P, Salmeron M, Silvian C, Roseau G, Canard J-M, Chaussade S, Couturier D, Paolaggi JA. (1995) Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 42: 225–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Tham TCK, Lichtenstein DR, Vandervoort J, Wong RCK, Brooks D, Van Dam J, Ruymann F, Farraye F, Carr-Locke DL. (1998) Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 47: 50–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Jobe BA, Standage BA, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL (2001) Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 15: 4–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar