Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections for cancer in 235 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years

  • E. Lezoche
  • M. Guerrieri
  • A. De Sanctis
  • R. Campagnacci
  • M. Baldarelli
  • G. Lezoche
  • A. M. Paganini
Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic resection for cure of colorectal cancer is controversial. More investigations on long-term results are required. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcome with a minimum follow-up of 5 years between laparoscopic or open approach for the treatment of colo-rectal cancer.

Methods

The treatment modality (laparoscopic or open) was related to the patients (pts) choice. The following parameters between the two groups (laparoscopic and open) were assessed: wound recurrences rate, local recurrences rate, incidence of distant metastases and survival probability analysis.

Results

We report the long term outcome of 149 pts with colon cancer of which 85 treated by Laparoscopic Surgery (LS) and 64 by Open Surgery (OS) and of 86 patients with rectal cancer of which 52 treated by LS and 34 by OS. In the pts with colonic cancer, mean follow-up was 82.8 months. No Statistically Significant Difference (SSD) was observed in the local recurrences rate (3.5% after LS and 6.2% after OS) and in the incidence of distant metastases (10.5% after LS and 10.9% after OS). Cumulative survival probability in LS was 0.882 as compared to 0.859 after OS. In the pts with rectal cancer, mean follow-up was 78.5 months. No SSD was observed in the local recurrences rate (19.2% after LS and 17.6% after OS) and in the incidence of distant metastases (15.3% after LS and 20.5% after OS). Cumulative survival probability in LS was 0.711 as compared to 0.617 after OS. We report an interesting data about the time of recurrences between LS and OS: the recurrences were delayed after LS, both after colonic (22.6 months vs 6.5) and rectal (25.7 months vs 13.0) resections, respectively.

Conclusion

We suppose that laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colo-rectal cancer is quite safe. However, further investigation is needed.

Keywords

GI endoscopy Colorectal Cancer 

References

  1. 1.
    Abel U, Koch A (1999) The role of randomization in clinical studies: myths and beliefs. J Clin Epidemiol 52: 487–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abulafi AM, Williams NS (1994) Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management, and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 81: 7–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avins AL (1998) Can unequal be more fair? Ethics, subject allocation, and randomised clinical trials. J Med Ethics 24: 401–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF (1994) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet 344: 58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bessler M, Whelan RL, Halverson A, Treat MR, Nowygrod R (1994) Is immune function better preserved after laparoscopic versus open colon resection? Surg Endosc 8: 881–883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bouvy ND, Marquet RL, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic surgery is associated with less tumor growt stimulation than conventional surgery: an experimental study. Br J Surg 84: 358–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Champault GG, Barrat C, Raselli R, Elizalde A, Catheline JM (2002) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma: a prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 88–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cook JL (1987) Natural killer cell activity associated with human neoplasms. Am Rev Respir Dis 136:1323–1324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eilber FR, Morton DL (1970) Impaired immunologic reactivity and recurrence following cancer surgery. Cancer 25: 362–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Etchells E (1999) Informed consent in surgical trials. World J Surg 23: 1215–1219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, De Sanctis A, Campagnacci R, Perretta S, D’Ambrosio G, Lezoche G, Lezoche E (2003) Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer on 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc 17: 1530–1535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Franklin ME, Kazantsev GB, Abrego-Medina D, Diaz A, Balli J, Glass JL (2000) Laparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancer. Surg Endosc 14: 612–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, Dorman JP, Glass JL , Norem R, Diaz A (1996) Prospective comparison of open vs laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five years results. Dis Colon Rectum 10: S35–S46Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Norem R (1995) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic colon resection versus open colon resection for adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 9: 811–816PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guerrieri M, Feliciotti F, Baldarelli M, Zenobi P, De Sanctis A, Lezoche G, Lezoche E (2003) Sphincter-saving surgery in patients with rectal cancer treated by radiotherapy and transanal endoscopic microsurgery: 10 years’ experience. Dig Liver Dis 35: 876–880CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Van Krieken JH, Leer JW, Van De Velde CJ; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resecable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 30: 638–646Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirman I, Cekic V, Poltoratskaia N, Sylla P, Jain S, Forde KA, Whelan RL (2005) Open surgery induces a dramatic decrease in circulating intact IGFBP-3 in patients with colorectal cancer not seen with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19: 55–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kojima M, Konishi F, Okada M, Nagai H (2004) Laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy for colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of patients followed up for at least 4 years. Surg Today 34: 1020–1024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lacy AM, Delgado S, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Castells A, Pique JM, Grande L, Fuster J, Targarona EM, Pera M, Visa J. (1998) Port-site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 12: 1039–1042PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial Lancet 359: 2224–2229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, De Sanctis A (2000) Laparoscopic colonic resections versus open surgery: a prospective nonrandomized study on 310 unselected cases. Hepatogastroenterology 47: 697–710PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, De Sanctis A, Campanacci R (2001) Laparoscopic colonic resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 6: 401–408Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, De Sanctis A, Minervini S, Campanacci R (2002) Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy for colonic cancer: long-term outcome. Surg Endosc 16: 596–602PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lezoche E, Paganini AM (2004) The author replies. Surg Endosc 9Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marsh PJ, James RD, Schofield PF (1995) Definition of local recurrence after surgery for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 82: 465–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McLeod RS (1999) Issue in surgical randomised controlled trials. Worl J Surg 23: 1210–1214Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moutardier V, Tardat E, Giovannini M, Lelong B, Guiramand J, Magnin V, Houvenaeghel G, Delpero JR (2003) Long-term results of preoperative radiotherapy for 113 cases of UT3 and UT4 rectal cancer: a need for long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 1194–1199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Fleshman J, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart MW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Ota D (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer: the clinical outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Puolin EC, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, Gregoire R, Roy N (1999) Laparoscopic resection does not adversely affect early survival curves in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 4: 487–492Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Konradt J, Barlehner E, Kohler L, Wittekind Ch, Kockerling F (2002) Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection with curative intent for carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc 16: 7–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sietses C, Havenith CE, Eijsbouts QA, van Leeuwen PA, Meijer S, Beelen RH, Cuesta MA (2000) Laparoscopic surgery preserves monocyte-mediated tumor cell killing in contrast to the conventional approach. Surg Endosc 14: 456–460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tomita H, Marcello PW, Milsom JW (1999) Laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum. Worl J Surg 4: 397–405Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vernava AM, Longo WE, Johnson FE (1994) Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer: results of a survey of members of the ASCRS. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 573–583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wexner SD, (2000) Trocar-site recurrences: myth or real concern? Postgraduate course on laparoscopy in the management of malignancy. SAGES 2000, Atlanta, Georgia, USAGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Kitajima M (2001) Oncologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 48: 1248–1251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG, Li JW, Wang ML, Mao ZH, Hu YY, Dong F, Hu WG, Li DH, Zang L, Peng YF, Yu BM (2005) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 11: 323–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhou XG, Yu BM, Shen YX (1983) Surgical treatment and late results in 1,226 cases of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 26: 250–256PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Lezoche
    • 1
  • M. Guerrieri
    • 2
  • A. De Sanctis
    • 2
  • R. Campagnacci
    • 2
  • M. Baldarelli
    • 2
  • G. Lezoche
    • 1
  • A. M. Paganini
    • 1
  1. 1.General Surgery“La Sapienza” University of RomaRomeItaly
  2. 2.General SurgeryUniversity of AnconaAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations