Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections for cancer in 235 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years
Laparoscopic resection for cure of colorectal cancer is controversial. More investigations on long-term results are required. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcome with a minimum follow-up of 5 years between laparoscopic or open approach for the treatment of colo-rectal cancer.
The treatment modality (laparoscopic or open) was related to the patients (pts) choice. The following parameters between the two groups (laparoscopic and open) were assessed: wound recurrences rate, local recurrences rate, incidence of distant metastases and survival probability analysis.
We report the long term outcome of 149 pts with colon cancer of which 85 treated by Laparoscopic Surgery (LS) and 64 by Open Surgery (OS) and of 86 patients with rectal cancer of which 52 treated by LS and 34 by OS. In the pts with colonic cancer, mean follow-up was 82.8 months. No Statistically Significant Difference (SSD) was observed in the local recurrences rate (3.5% after LS and 6.2% after OS) and in the incidence of distant metastases (10.5% after LS and 10.9% after OS). Cumulative survival probability in LS was 0.882 as compared to 0.859 after OS. In the pts with rectal cancer, mean follow-up was 78.5 months. No SSD was observed in the local recurrences rate (19.2% after LS and 17.6% after OS) and in the incidence of distant metastases (15.3% after LS and 20.5% after OS). Cumulative survival probability in LS was 0.711 as compared to 0.617 after OS. We report an interesting data about the time of recurrences between LS and OS: the recurrences were delayed after LS, both after colonic (22.6 months vs 6.5) and rectal (25.7 months vs 13.0) resections, respectively.
We suppose that laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colo-rectal cancer is quite safe. However, further investigation is needed.
KeywordsGI endoscopy Colorectal Cancer
- 13.Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, Dorman JP, Glass JL , Norem R, Diaz A (1996) Prospective comparison of open vs laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five years results. Dis Colon Rectum 10: S35–S46Google Scholar
- 16.Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Van Krieken JH, Leer JW, Van De Velde CJ; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resecable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 30: 638–646Google Scholar
- 22.Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, De Sanctis A, Campanacci R (2001) Laparoscopic colonic resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 6: 401–408Google Scholar
- 24.Lezoche E, Paganini AM (2004) The author replies. Surg Endosc 9Google Scholar
- 26.McLeod RS (1999) Issue in surgical randomised controlled trials. Worl J Surg 23: 1210–1214Google Scholar
- 28.Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Fleshman J, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart MW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Ota D (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer: the clinical outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059Google Scholar
- 29.Puolin EC, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, Gregoire R, Roy N (1999) Laparoscopic resection does not adversely affect early survival curves in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 4: 487–492Google Scholar
- 32.Tomita H, Marcello PW, Milsom JW (1999) Laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum. Worl J Surg 4: 397–405Google Scholar
- 34.Wexner SD, (2000) Trocar-site recurrences: myth or real concern? Postgraduate course on laparoscopy in the management of malignancy. SAGES 2000, Atlanta, Georgia, USAGoogle Scholar