National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores

Article

Abstract

Background

Two treatment options exist for choledocholithiasis (CDL): endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Resource utilization measured by total in-hospital charges (THC) and length of stay (LOS) was compared using the propensity score (PS). In this study, PS was the probability that a patient received CBDE based on comorbidities and demographics. The power of this method lies in balancing groups on variables by PS, resulting in 90% bias reduction and improved inferential validity compared to traditional analytic techniques.

Methods

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) patients with CDL who had ERCP or CBDE were identified in the 2002 U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients were ordered into five PS balanced strata. Mean THC, LOS, and estimated costs were compared. A linear regression model was used to estimate the contribution that LOS had on estimated costs. Monetary values were adjusted to 2004 dollars.

Results

A total of 40,982 patients underwent LC with CDL in 2002; 27,739 had either ERCP (93%) or CBDE (7%). Mean age was 52.7 ± 0.4 years, with 74% women. Mean THC were less for CBDE ($25,200 ± $1,800) than for ERCP ($29,900 ± $800, p < 0.05). Mean LOS was less for CBDE (4.9 ± 0.2 days) than for ERCP (5.6 ± 0.1 days, p < 0.05). PS adjusted analysis revealed an estimated overall cost savings of $4,500 ± $1,600 and reduced LOS (0.6 ± 0.2 days) per hospitalization for CBDE. Mean THC, LOS, and estimated costs across PS score balanced strata were generally higher in the ERCP group compared to the CBDE group. LOS contributed 53% to increased THC and 62% of estimated costs. A higher cumulative incidence of complications was evident with CBDE (0.5–4.6%) compared to ERCP (0.3–3.6%).

Conclusions

Based on this PS analysis, CBDE incurs less THC, reduces LOS, and has less estimated costs for CDL compared to ERCP. Furthermore, CBDE appears to be dramatically underutilized.

Keywords

Common bile duct Choledocholithiasis Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Propensity score 

References

  1. 1.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2002) Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP-2002). Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker SO, Ichino A (2002) Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata J 2: 358–377Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2004) Available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/providers/hipps/ippspufs.asp
  4. 4.
    Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, et al. (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13: 952–957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45: 613–619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Medical Care 36: 8–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fielding GA, (2002) The case for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surg 9: 723–728Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239: 43–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR (1999) Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol 150: 327–333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kapoor R, Kaushik SP, Saraswat VA, Choudhuri G, Sikora SS, Saxena R, Kapoor VK (1996) Prospective randomized trial comparing endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by surgery with surgery alone in good risk patients with choledocholithiasis. HPB Surg 9: 145–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Rosenthal R, Hiatt J (1996) Cost-effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or endoscopic sphincterotomy. J Am Coll Surg 182: 488–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Institutes of Health (2002) NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consensus State-of-the-Science Statements 19: 1–26Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paganini AM, Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Tamburini A, De Sanctis A, Campagnacci R, Lezoche E (2001) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techniques A 11: 391–400Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Petelin JB (2003) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17: 1705–1715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Radensky PW, Berliner E, Archer JW, Dournaux SF (2001) Inpatient costs of major cardiovascular events. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 1: 205–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351: 159–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1984) Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Statistical Assoc 79: 516–524Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sahai AV, Mauldin PD, Marsi V, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ (1999) Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decision analysis to assess the roles of intraoperative cholangiography, EUS, and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 49: 334–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sgourakis G, Karaliotas K (2002) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study. Minerva Chir 57: 467–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stain SC, Cohen H, Tsuishoysha M, Donovan AJ (1991) Choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 213: 627-634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suc B, Escat J, Cherqui D, Fourtanier G, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Millat B (1998) Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones: a multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 133: 702–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Jobe BA, Standage BA, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL (2001) Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 15: 4–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (2004) Consumer price index for medical care. Available at http://www.bls.gov/cpi . U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. K. Poulose
    • 1
  • P. G. Arbogast
    • 2
  • M. D. Holzman
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Surgical SciencesVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Biostatistics and Preventive MedicineVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations