Mobile in vivo camera robots provide sole visual feedback for abdominal exploration and cholecystectomy

  • M. E. Rentschler
  • J. Dumpert
  • S. R. Platt
  • S. I. Ahmed
  • S. M. Farritor
  • D. Oleynikov
Article

Abstract

The use of small incisions in laparoscopy reduces patient trauma, but also limits the surgeon’s ability to view and touch the surgical environment directly. These limitations generally restrict the application of laparoscopy to procedures less complex than those performed during open surgery. Although current robot-assisted laparoscopy improves the surgeon’s ability to manipulate and visualize the target organs, the instruments and cameras remain fundamentally constrained by the entry incisions. This limits tool tip orientation and optimal camera placement. The current work focuses on developing a new miniature mobile in vivo adjustable-focus camera robot to provide sole visual feedback to surgeons during laparoscopic surgery. A miniature mobile camera robot was inserted through a trocar into the insufflated abdominal cavity of an anesthetized pig. The mobile robot allowed the surgeon to explore the abdominal cavity remotely and view trocar and tool insertion and placement without entry incision constraints. The surgeon then performed a cholecystectomy using the robot camera alone for visual feedback. This successful trial has demonstrated that miniature in vivo mobile robots can provide surgeons with sufficient visual feedback to perform common procedures while reducing patient trauma.

Keywords

Cholecystectomy Exploration In vivo Laparoscopy Mobile Robots 

References

  1. 1.
    Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Surg Endosc 16: 1389–1402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kang H, Wen JT (2001) Robotic assistants aid surgeons during minimally invasive procedures. IEEE Eng Med Biol 20: 94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim VB, Chapman WHH, Albrecht RJ, Bailey BM, Young JA, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR (2002) Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 33–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oleynikov D, Rentschler M, Hadzialic A, Dumpert J, Platt SR, Farritor S (2005) Miniature robots can assist in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19: 473–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Hadzialic A, Platt S, Oleynikov D, Iagnemma K, Farritor S (2004) Theoretical and experimental analysis of in vivo wheeled mobility. ASME 28th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference DETC2004–57468, Salt Lake City, UT, September 2004Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt S, Iagnemma K, Oleynikov D, Farritor S (In press) Modeling, analysis, and experimental study of in vivo wheeled robotic mobility. IEEE Transactions on RoboticsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rentschler M, Hadzialic A, Dumpert J, Platt SR, Farritor S, Oleynikov D (2004) In vivo robots for laparoscopic surgery. Stud Health Technol Informatics 98: 316–322Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rentschler M, Oleynikov D, Hadzialic A, Dumpert J, Platt SR, Farritor S (2004) In vivo camera robots provide improved vision for laparoscopic surgery. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Conference, Chicago, IL, June 2004Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Satava RM, Jones SB (2002) Surgical robotics: the early chronicles. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 6–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schurr MO, Buess G, Neisius B, Voges U (2000) Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 14: 375–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1,518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324: 1073–1078Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wolfe B, Gardiner B, Leary B, Frey C (1991) Endoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of complications. Arch Surg 126: 1192–1998PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. E. Rentschler
    • 1
  • J. Dumpert
    • 1
  • S. R. Platt
    • 1
  • S. I. Ahmed
    • 2
  • S. M. Farritor
    • 1
  • D. Oleynikov
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Nebraska, N104 Walter Scott Engineering CenterLincolnUSA
  2. 2.University of Nebraska Medical Center, 983280 Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations