Thirty robotic adrenalectomies

A single institution’s experience
  • J. M. Winter
  • M. A. Talamini
  • C. L. Stanfield
  • D. C. Chang
  • J. D. Hundt
  • A. P. Dackiw
  • K. A. Campbell
  • R. D. Schulick



Robotic adrenalectomy is a minimally invasive alternative to traditional laparoscopic adrenalectomy. To date, only case reports and small series of robotic adrenalectomies have been reported. This study presents a single institution’s series of 30 robotic adrenalectomies, and evaluates the procedure’s safety, efficacy, and cost.


Thirty patients underwent robotic adrenalectomy at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between April 2001 and January 2004. Patient morbidity, hospital length of stay, operative time, and conversion rate to traditional laparoscopic or open surgery are presented. Improvement in operative time with surgeon experience is evaluated. Hospital charges are compared to charges for traditional laparoscopic and open adrenalectomies performed during the same time period.


Median operative time was 185 min. Patient morbidity was 7%. There were no conversions to traditional laparoscopic or open surgery. The median hospital stay was 2 days. Operative time improved significantly by 3 min with each operation. Hospital charges for robotic adrenalectomy ($12,977) were not significantly different than charges for traditional laparoscopic ($11,599) or open adrenalectomy ($14,600).


Robotic adrenalectomy is a safe and effective alternative to traditional laparoscopic adrenalectomy.


Adrenalectomy Robot da Vinci Laparoscopy Cost Learning curve 


  1. 1.
    Beninca G, Garrone C, Rebecchi F, Giaccone C, Morino M (2003) Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Prelimary results at our center. Chir Ital 55: 321–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bentas W, Wolfram M, Brautigam R, Binder J (2002) Laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy using a remote-controlled robotic surgical team. J Endourol 16: 373–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brunaud L, Bresler L, Ayav A, Tretou S, Cormier L, Klein M, Boissel P (2003) Advantages of using robotic da Vinci system for unilateral adrenalectomy: early results. Ann Chir 128: 530–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Costi R, Himpens J, Bruyns J, Cadiere GB (2003) Robotic fundoplication: from theoretic advantages to real problems. J Am Coll Surg 197: 500–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D’Annibale A, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Pozzobon M, Gianfreda V, Sovernigo G, Morpurgo E, Orsini C, Del Monte D (2004) The da Vinci robot in right adrenalectomy: considerations on technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14: 38–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    David G, Gross D, Reissman P (2004) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: ascending the learning curve. Surg Endosc 18: 771–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Desai MM, Gill IS, Kaouk JH, Matin SF, Sung GY, Bravo EL (2002) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Urology 60: 1104–1107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gagner M, Lacroix A, Prinz RA, Bolte E, Albala D, Potvin C, Hamet P, Kuchel O, Querin S, Pomp A (1993) Early experience with laparoscopic approach for adrenalectomy. Surgery 114: 1120–1124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138: 777–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Montorsi F, Bellinzoni P, Centemero A, Naspro R, Salonia A, Rigatti P (2004) Laparoscopic treatment of adrenal disease: 10 years on. Br J Urol Int 93: 221–227Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A, Rockall T (2004) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 18: 372–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Horgan S, Vanuno D (2001) Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 11: 415–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hubens G, Coveliers H, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Vaneerdeweg W (2003) A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 17: 1595–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jacobsen G, Elli F, Horgan S (2004) Robotic surgery update. Surg Endosc 18: 1186–1191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Quinn T, Gagner M (2003) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. In: Cueto-Garcia J, Jacobs M, Gagner (Eds) Laparoscopic surgery. McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York, pp 367–373Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Satava RM (2003) The New technology. In: Cueto-Garcia J, Jacobs M, Gagner (Eds) Laparoscopic surgery. McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York, pp 5–13Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Talamini MA, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin WS (2003) A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 17: 1521–1524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Undre S, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Martin S, Rockall T, Vale J, Darzi A (2004) Robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: preliminary UK results. Br J Urol Int 93: 357–359Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Young JA, Chapman WH 3rd, Kim VB, Albrecht RJ, Ng PC, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr (2002) Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy for adrenal incidentaloma: case and review of the technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 126–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zeh HJ, Udelsman R (2003) One hundred laparoscopic adrenalectomies: a single surgeon’s experience. Ann Surg Oncol 10: 1012–1017PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Winter
    • 1
  • M. A. Talamini
    • 1
  • C. L. Stanfield
    • 1
  • D. C. Chang
    • 1
  • J. D. Hundt
    • 1
  • A. P. Dackiw
    • 1
  • K. A. Campbell
    • 1
  • R. D. Schulick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryJohns Hopkins Medical InstitutionsBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations