Advertisement

A 6-year experience with the Swedish adjustable gastric band

Prospective long-term audit of laparoscopic gastric banding
  • J. Zehetner
  • F. Holzinger
  • H. Triaca
  • Ch. KlaiberEmail author
Original article

Abstract

Background

In morbid obesity conservative therapy often fails to reduce overweight permanently. As a consequence, several bariatric surgical procedures have been developed to achieve permanent excess weight loss. Among these, the laparoscopic restrictive procedures seem to be the least invasive. The aim of this prospective study was to assess and analyze the effects, complications, and outcomes after the implantation of the Swedish adjustable gastric band (SAGB) in long-term follow-up.

Methods

All consecutive patients with implantation of a SAGB between August 1996 and August 2002 were prospectively investigated. The placement of the SAGB was done by laparoscopy in all cases. Success was rated by the reduction of body mass index (BMI) excess weight loss (EWL), and reduction of comorbidities. “Nonresponders” to SAGB were defined as <30% EWL after a 3-year follow-up. Band-related complications were recorded and classified. Patient’s outcome was assessed after 6 months and subsequently each year postoperatively.

Results

A total of 190 patients received a SAGB, 97% of whom could be followed up with a mean follow-up period of 39.4 months (duration of follow-up, 6–72). During follow-up, a significant reduction or improvement of BMI, EWL, and comorbidities were found. Nineteen percent of patients were identified as nonresponders. Early intraoperative and postoperative complications related to SAGB were one perforation of the gastric fundus (0.5%), one conversion (0.5%), one bleeding (0.5%), and two band infections (1.1%). The SAGB-related complications encountered during long-term follow-up were three port problems (1.6%), four band migrations (2.1%), five slipping/pouch dilatations (2.6%), and two band leakages (1.1%). All intra- and postoperative SAGB-related complications accounted for a total morbidity of 10.5%. Operative mortality was 0%. The overall reoperation rate was 8.5%.

Conclusions

In long-term follow-up, SAGB is safe and effective. Our results demonstrate a significant EWL of 50% during the first 24 months. However, patient selection has to be improved to reduce the nonresponder rate. SAGB leads to a significant reduction of obesity-related comorbidities. SAGB is an attractive alternative in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity.

Keywords

Morbid obesity Gastric banding Comorbidities Long-term follow-up 

References

  1. 1.
    Baldinger, R,  et al. 2001Conservative management of intragastric migration of Swedish adjustable gastric band by endoscopic retrievalGastrointest Endosc5398101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belachew, M,  et al. 1998Laparoscopic adjustable gastric bandingWorld J Surg22955963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ceelen, W,  et al. 2003Surgical treatment of severe obesity with a low-pressure adjustable gastric band: experimental data and clinical results in 625 patientsAnn Surg2371016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dargent, J 2003Pouch dilatation and slippage after adjustable gastric banding: is it still an issue?Obes Surg13111115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeMaria, EJ,  et al. 2001High failure rate after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for treatment of morbid obesityAnn Surg233809918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dixon, JB, O’Brien, PE 2002Changes in comorbidities and improvements in quality of life after LAP-BAND placementAm J Surg18451S54SGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drenick, EJ,  et al. 1980Excessive mortality and causes of death in morbidly obese menJ Am Med Assoc243443445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dukhno, O, Ovnat, A, Levy, I 2003Our experience with 250 laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric bandingsSurg Endosc17601602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evans, JD,  et al. 2002Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesityAm J Surg18497102Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fabry, H,  et al. 2002A technique for prevention of port complications after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric bandingObes Surg12285288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Favretti, F,  et al. 2002Laparoscopic banding: selection and technique in 830 patientsObes Surg12385390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Forsell, P, Hallberg, D, Hellers, G 1993A gastric band with adjustable inner diameter for obesity surgery: preliminary studiesObes Surg3303306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forsell, P,  et al. 1999Complications following Swedish adjustable gastric banding: a long-term follow-upObes Surg91161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hauri, P,  et al. 2000Treatment of morbid obesity with the Swedish adjustable gastric band (SAGB): complication rate during a 12-month follow-up periodSurgery127484488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klaiber, C, Metzger, A, Forsell, P 2000Laparoscopic gastric bandingChirurg71146151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuzmak, LI,  et al. 1990Surgery for morbid obesityUsing an inflatable gastric band. Aorn J5113071324Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miller, K, Hell, E 1999Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a prospective 4-year follow-up studyObes Surg9183187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nehoda, H,  et al. 2001Laparoscopic gastric banding in older patientsArch Surg13611711176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Niville, E, Dams, A, Vlasselaers, J 2001Lap-Band erosion: incidence and treatmentObes Surg11744747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    O’Brien, PE,  et al. 2002The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (Lap-Band): a prospective study of medium-term effects on weight, health and quality of lifeObes Surg12652660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Regusci, L,  et al. 2003Gastroscopic removal of an adjustable gastric band after partial intragastric migrationObes Surg13281284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ren, CJ, Horgan, S, Ponce, J 2002US experience with the LAP-BAND systemAm J Surg18446S50SGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rubenstein, RB 2002Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding at a U.Scenter with up to 3-year follow-up. Obes Surg12380384Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Szold, A, Abu-Abeid, S 2002Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity: results and complications in 715 patientsSurg Endosc16230233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Victorzon, M, Tolonen, P 2002Intermediate results following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesityDig Surg19354357discussion 358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weiner, R,  et al. 1998Management and therapy of postoperative complications after “gastric banding” for morbid obesityChirurg6910821088PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weiss, H,  et al. 2000Injection port complication after gastric banding: incidence, management and preventionObes Surg10259262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weiss, H,  et al. 2000Gastroscopic band removal after intragastric migration of adjustable gastric band: a new minimal invasive techniqueObes Surg10167170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wiesner, W,  et al. 2001Spontaneous volume changes in gastric banding devices: complications of a semipermeable membraneEur Radiol11417421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilkinson, LH, Peloso, OA 1981Gastric (reservoir) reduction for morbid obesityArch Surg116602605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zinzindohoue, F,  et al. 2003Laparscopic gastric banding: a minimally invasive surgical treatment forlmorbid obesity: prospective study of 500 consecutive patientsAnn Surg23719Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Zehetner
    • 1
  • F. Holzinger
    • 1
  • H. Triaca
    • 1
  • Ch. Klaiber
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryAarberg HospitalSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations