Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and wound closure technique on port site tumor implantation in a rat model
- First Online:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum and wound closure technique on port site tumor implantation.
A standard quantity of rat mammary adenocarcinoma (SMT2A)was allowed to grow in a flank incision in Wistar-Furth rats (n = 90) for 14 days. Thereafter, 1-cm incisions were made in each animal in three quadrants. There were six control animals. The experimental animals were divided into a 60-min CO2 pneumoperitoneum group (n = 42) and a no pneumoperitoneum (n = 42) group. The flank tumor was lacerated transabdominally in the experimental groups. The three wound sites were randomized to closure of (a) skin; (b) skin and fascia; and (c) skin, fascia, and peritoneum. The abdominal wounds were harvested en bloc on postoperative day 7.
Histologic comparison of the port sites in the pneumoperitoneum and no-pneumoperitoneum groups did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in tumor implantation for any of the closure methods. Evaluation of the closure techniques showed no statistical difference between the pneumoperitoneum group and the no-pneumoperitoneum group in the incidence of port site tumor implantation. Within the no-pneumoperitoneum group, there was a significant increase (p = 0.03) in tumor implantation with skin closure alone vs all three layers. Additionally, when we compared all groups by closure technique, the rate of tumor implantation was found to be significantly higher (p = 0.01) for skin closure alone vs closure of all three layers.
This study suggests that closure technique may influence the rate of port site tumor implantation. The use of a CO2 pneumoperitoneum did not alter the incidence of port site tumor implantation at 7 days postoperatively.
KeywordsPort site metastasis Laparoscopy Tumor biology Pneumoperitoneum Carbon dioxide insufflation Cancer
- 5.Baker, DG, Masterson, TM, Pace, R, Constable, WC, Wanebo, H 1989The influence of the surgical wound on local tumor recurrenceSurg106525532Google Scholar
- 9.Brundell, SM, Tucker, K, Texler, M, Brown, B, Chatterton, B, Hewett, PJ 2002Variables in the spread of tumor cells to trocars and port sites during operative laparoscopySurgEndosc1614131419Google Scholar
- 11.Cirocco, WC, Schwartzmann, A, Golub, RW 1994Abdominal recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancerSurg116842846Google Scholar
- 12.Clinical Outcome of Surgical Therapy Study Group2004A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancerN Engl J Med35020502059Google Scholar
- 14.Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals19XXGuide for the care and use of laboratory animalsUS Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Services. National Institutes of HealthBethesda (MD), 20892, August 7, 2002Google Scholar
- 33.Mathew, G, Watson, KI, Rofe, AM, Baigrie, CF, Ellis, T, Jamieson, GG 1997Adverse impact of pneumoperitoneum on intraperitoneal implantation and growth of tumour cell suspension in an experimental modelAust N Z J Surg61289292Google Scholar