Miniature robots can assist in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • D. Oleynikov
  • M. Rentschler
  • A. Hadzialic
  • J. Dumpert
  • S. R. Platt
  • S. Farritor
Original article

Abstract

Laparoscopy reduces patient trauma but eliminates the surgeon’s ability to directly view and touch the surgical environment. Although current robot-assisted laparoscopy improves the surgeon’s ability to manipulate and visualize the target organs, the instruments and cameras remain constrained by the entry incision. This limits tool tip orientation and optimal camera placement. This article focuses on developing miniature in vivo robots to assist surgeons during laparoscopic surgery by providing an enhanced field of view from multiple angles and dexterous manipulators not constrained by the abdominal wall fulcrum effect. Miniature camera robots were inserted through a small incision into the insufflated abdominal cavity of an anesthetized pig. Trocar insertion and other laparoscopic tool placements were then viewed with these robotic cameras. The miniature robots provided additional camera angles that improved surgical visualization during a cholecystectomy. These successful prototype trials have demonstrated that miniature in vivo robots can provide surgeons with additional visual information that can increase procedural safety.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Cholecystectomy In vivo Vision Robots 

References

  1. 1.
    Cavusoglu, MC, Williams, W, Tendick, F, Sastry, SS 2003Robotics for telesurgery: second generation Berkeley/UCSF laparoscopic telesurgical workstation and looking towards the future applicationsInd. Robot Int J302229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Falcone, T, Goldberg, JM 2003Robotic surgeryClin Obstet Gynecol463743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kazemier, G, Hazebroeck, EJ, Lange, JF, Bonjer, HJ 1998Vascular injuries during laparoscopyJ Am Coll Surg186604605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leggett, PL, Bissell, CD, Churchman-Winn, R 2002Aortic injury during laparoscopic fundoplication: an underreported complicationSurg Endosc16362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, RA, Jensen, J, Bowersox, JC 2000Microvascular anastomoses performed in rats using microsurgical telemanipulatorComput Aided Surg5326332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Munro, MG 2002Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniquesCurr Opin Obstet Gynecol14365374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orlando, R, Palatini, P, Lirussi, F 2003Needle and trocar injuries in diagnostic laparoscopy under local anesthesia: what is the true incidence of these complicationsJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techniques13181184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rentschler, M, Hadzializ, A, Dumpert, J, Platt, S, Farritor, S, Oleynikov, D 2004In vivo robots for laparoscopic surgeryMed Meets Virtual Reality12316322Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schippers, E, Schumpelick, V 1996Requirements and possibilities of computer-assisted Endoscope surgeryComput Integrated Surg Technol Clin Appl43561565Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Southern Surgeons Club1991A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomiesN Engl J Med32410731078Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tendick, F, Jennings, RW, Thrap, G, Stark, L 1993Sensing and manipulation problems in endoscopic surgery: experiment,analysis, and observationPresence26681Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tendick, F, Jennings, R, Thrap, G, Stark, L 1996Perception and manipulation problems in endoscope surgeryComput Integrated Surg Technol Clin Appl39520526Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tendick, F, Sastry, SS, Fearing, RS, Cohn, M 1998Applications of micromechatronics in minimally invasive surgeryIEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics33442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Treat, M 1996A surgeon’s perspective on the difficulties of laparoscopic surgeryComput Integrated Surg Technol Clin Appl41549556Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolfe, B, Gardinef, B, Leary, B,  et al. 1991Endoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of complicationsArch Surg12611921998PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Oleynikov
    • 1
  • M. Rentschler
    • 2
  • A. Hadzialic
    • 2
  • J. Dumpert
    • 2
  • S. R. Platt
    • 2
  • S. Farritor
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA
  2. 2.University of NebraskaLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations