Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients

  • P. P. Tekkis
  • A. J. Senagore
  • C. P. Delaney
Original article



This study aimed all develop a mathematical model for predicting the conversion rate for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.


This descriptive single-center study used routinely collected clinical data from 1,253 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. A two-level hierarchical regression model was used to identify patient, surgeon, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. The model was internally validated and tested using measures of discrimination and calibration. Exclusion criteria for laparoscopic colectomy included a body mass greater than 50, lesion diameter exceeding 15 cm, and multiple prior major laparotomies (exclusive of appendectomy, hysterectomy, and cholecystectomy).


The average conversion rate for the study population was 10.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3–11.7%). The independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 2.1 per 10 Americans Society of Anesthesiology units increase), (ASA) grade 3 or 4, 1 or 2 (OR, 3.2, 5.8), type of resection (low rectal, left colorectal, right colonic vs small/other bowel procedures; OR, 8.82, 4.76, 2.98), presence of intraoperative abscess (OR, 3.60) or fistula (OR, 4.73), and surgeon seniority (junior vs senior staff OR, 1.56). The model offered adequate discrimination (area under receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.74) and excellent agreement (p = 0.384) between observed and model-predicted conversion rates (range of calibration, 3–32% conversion rate).


Laparoscopic conversion rates are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment for case mix before comparisons are made between or within centers. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) laparoscopic conversion rate model is a simple additive score that can be used in everyday practice to evaluate outcomes for laparoscopic colorectal surgery


Laparoscopy colorectal surgery conversion predictive model 


  1. 1.
    Aylin, P, Alves, B, Best, N, Cook, A, Elliott, P, Evans, SJ,  et al. 2001Comparison of UK paediatric cardiac surgical performance by analysis of routinely collected data 1984–1996: was Bristol an outlier?Lancet358181187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delaney, CP, Kiran, RP, Senagore, AJ, Brady, K, Fazio, VW 2003Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgeryAnn Surg2386772CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dincler, S, Koller, MT, Steurer, J, Bachmann, LM, Christen, D, Buchmann, P 2003Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year resultsDis Colon Rectum4613711378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gervaz, P, Pikarsky, A, Utech, M, Secic, M, Efron, J, Belin, B,  et al. 2001Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgerySurg Endosc15827832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanley, JA, McNeil, BJ 1982The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curveRadiology1432936PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harrell, FE,Jr, Lee, KL, Mark, DB 1996Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errorsStat Med15361387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hosmer, DW, Lemeshow, S 2000Applied logistic regression2John WileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lacy, AM, Garcia-Valdecasas, JC, Delgado, S, Grande, L, Fuster, J, Tabet, J,  et al. 1997Postoperative complications of laparoscopic-assisted colectomySurg Endosc11119122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larach, SW, Patankar, SK, Ferrara, A, Williamson, PR, Perozo, SE, Lord, AS 1997Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis and comparison of early vs latter experienceDis Colon Rectum40592596PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marusch, F, Gastinger, I, Schneider, C, Scheidbach, H, Konradt, J, Bruch, HP,  et al. 2001Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the resultsSurg Endosc15116120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marusch, F, Gastinger, I, Schneider, C, Scheidbach, H, Konradt, J, Bruch, HP,  et al. 2001Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgeryDis Colon Rectum44207114discussion 14–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moorthy, K, Shaul, T, Foley, RJ 2004Factors that predict conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for Crohn’s diseaseAm J Surg1874751Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pandya, S, Murray, JJ, Coller, JA, Rusin, LC 1999Laparoscopic colectomy: indications for conversion to laparotomyArch Surg134471475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pikarsky, AJ, Saida, Y, Yamaguchi, T, Martinez, S, Chen, W, Weiss, EG,  et al. 2002Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?Surg Endosc16855858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rasbash, J, Browne, W, Goldstein, H, Yang, M, Plewis, I, Healey, M,  et al. 2001A user’s guide to MLwiNUniversity of LondonLondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schlachta, CM, Mamazza, J, Gregoire, R, Burpee, SE, Pace, KT, Poulin, EC 2003Predicting conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgerySurg Endosc..Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schlachta, CM, Mamazza, J, Seshadri, PA, Cadeddu, M, Gregoire, R, Poulin, EC 2001Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resectionsDis Colon Rectum44217222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schlachta, CM, Mamazza, J, Seshadri, PA, Cadeddu, MO, Poulin, EC 2000Predicting conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal resections: a simple clinical modelSurg Endosc1411141117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schwandner, O, Schiedeck, TH, Bruch, H 1999The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do predictive factors exist?Surg Endosc13151156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Senagore, AJ, Delaney, CP, Madboulay, K, Brady, KM, Fazio, VW, Fazio, CV 2003Laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patientsJ Gastrointest Surg7558561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tekkis, PP, McCulloch, P, Poloniecki, JD, Prytherch, DR, Kessaris, N, Steger, AC 2004Risk-adjusted prediction of operative mortality in oesophagogastric surgery with O-POSSUMBr J Surg91288295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tekkis, PP, Poloniecki, JD, Thompson, MR, Stamatakis, JD 2003Operative mortality in colorectal cancer: prospective national studyBMJ32711961201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yong, L, Deane, M, Monson, JR, Darzi, A 2001Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancySurg Endosc1514311439PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. P. Tekkis
    • 1
  • A. J. Senagore
    • 1
  • C. P. Delaney
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Colorectal Surgery and the Minimally Invasive Surgery CenterCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations