National trends in utilization and outcomes of bariatric surgery
- 304 Downloads
Because of the growing interest in surgery to treat morbid obesity, this study examined changes in the utilization and in-hospital outcomes of bariatric surgery in the United States over a 10-year period.
Data were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest all-payer discharge database in the United States. International Classification of Disease (ICD-9) codes were used to identify all bariatric procedures performed for adults from 1990 to 2000. Population-based rates of surgery for each year were calculated by applying sampling weights and U.S. Census data. Secular trends in annual rates of surgery, changes in patient characteristics, and in-hospital mortality and complications were analyzed.
From 1990 to 2000, the national annual rate of bariatric surgery increased nearly six fold, from 2.4 to 14.1 per 100,000 adults (p = 0.001). There has been more than a ninefold increase in the use of gastric bypass procedures (1.4 to 13.1 per 100,000; p < 0.001). This represents an increase from 55% of all bariatric procedures in 1990 to 93% of such procedures in 2000 (p < 0.001). The rates of in-hospital mortality were low (0.4% overall), but increased slightly over time (0.2% in 1990 to 0.5% in 2000; p = 0.009). There is no significant difference in adjusted mortality for the past 8 years, but a slight rise did occur over the full 10-year period. The rates for reoperation (1.3%) and pulmonary emboli (0.3%) remained stable. The rates for respiratory failure associated with bariatric surgery declined from 7.7% in 1990 to 4.5% in 2000 (p < 0.001). Over this time, the mean length of hospital stay declined from 6.0 to 4.1 days (p < 0.001).
The annual rate of bariatric surgery in the United States increased nearly six fold between 1990 and 2000, with_little change in in-hospital morbidity and mortality. This appears to be driven largely by the increasing popularity of gastric bypass procedures.
KeywordsObesity Surgery Epidemiology Trends
- 1.Balsiger, BM, Kennedy, FP, Abu-Lebdeh, HS, Collazo-Clavell, M, Jensen, MD, O’Brien, T, Hensrud, DD, Dinneen, SF, Thompson, GB, Que, FG, Williams, DE, Clark, MM, Grant, JE, Frick, MS, Mueller, RA, Mai, JL, Sarr, MG 2000Prospective evaluation of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as primary operation for medically complicated obesityMayo Clin Proc75673680PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Flegal, KM, Carroll, MD, Kuczmarski, RJ, Johnson, CL 1998Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960-1994Int J Obes223947Google Scholar
- 10.Flegal, KM, Carroll, MD, Ogden, CL, Johnson, CL 2002Prevalence and trends in obesity among U.S. adults, 1999-2000J Am Med Assoc28817231727Google Scholar
- 13.Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity. NIH Consensus Statement 1991, Mar 25–27; 9: 1-20Google Scholar
- 17.Goldstein, N (1998) Prescribing drugs as a learned intermediary, Physician’s News Digest, Philadelphia, Vol 11, p 7Google Scholar
- 21.(HCUP) HCaUiP (2002) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
- 23.Hosmer, DW, Lemeshow, S 1989Applied logistic regressionJohn WileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
- 27.MacDonald, KG, Pories, WJ 1992Roux gastric bypass or vertical banded gastroplastyProb Gen Surg9321331Google Scholar
- 28.Mason, EE, Maheer, JW, Scott, DH, Rodriguez, EM, Doherty, C 1992Ten years of vertical banded gastroplasty for severe obesityProbl Gene Surg9280289Google Scholar
- 34.Naslund, I 1987Gastric bypass versus gastroplasty: a prospective study of differences in two surgical procedures for morbid obesityActa Chirurg Scand Suppl536160Google Scholar
- 35.National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity1993Very low calorie dietsJAMA270967974Google Scholar
- 37.Perri, MG, Fuller, PR 1995Success and failure in the treatment of obesity: where do we go from here?Med Exerc Nutr Health4255272Google Scholar
- 39.Pories, WJ 1991
The surgical approach to morbid obesitySabiston, DC eds. Textbook of surgery: the biologic basis of modern surgical practiceWB SaundersPhiladelphia, PA851866Google Scholar