Advertisement

The laparoscopic repair of suprapubic ventral hernias

  • A. M. Carbonell
  • K. W. Kercher
  • B. D. Matthews
  • R. F. Sing
  • W. S. Cobb
  • B. T. HenifordEmail author
Original article

Abstract

Background

The complexity of dissection and the close proximity of the hernia to bony, vascular, nerve, and urinary structures make the laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias (LRSPH) a formidable operation. We performed a prospective evaluation of the outcomes of patients undergoing LRSPH.

Methods

The study population comprised 36 patients undergoing LRSPH from July 1996 to January 2004. Patient demographics, hernia sizes, mesh types and sizes, perioperative outcomes, and recurrences were documented. After our early experience with this operation, the repair evolved to include transabdominal suture fixation to the pubic bone, Cooper’s ligament, and above the iliopubic tract.

Results

There were 26 women and 10 men. They had a mean age of 55.9 years (range, 33-76) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 31.0 kg/m2 (range, 22-67). Twenty-two (61%) of the repairs were for recurrent hernias, with an average of 2.3 previously failed open repairs each (range, 1-11). The mean hernia size was 191.4 cm2 (range, 20-768), and the average mesh size was 481.4 cm2 (range, 193-1,428). All repairs were performed with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh. Mean operating time was 178.7 min (range, 95-290). Mean blood loss was 40 cc (range, 20-100). One patient undergoing her fifth repair required conversion due to adhesions to a polypropylene mesh. Hospital stay averaged 2.4 days (range, 1-7). Mean follow-up was 21.1 months (range, 1-70). Complications (16.6%) included deep venous thrombosis (n = 1), prolonged pain for >6 weeks (n = 1), trocar site cellulitis (n = 1), ileus (n = 1), prolonged seroma (n = 1), and Clostridium difficile colitis (n = 1). Hernias recurred in two of our first nine patients, for an overall recurrence rate of 5.5%. Since we began using the technique of applying multiple sutures directly to the pubis and Cooper’s ligament (in the subsequent 27 patients), no recurrences have been documented.

Conclusions

Although technically demanding and time-consuming, the LRSPH is safe and technically feasible. Moreover, it results in a low recurrence rate and is applicable to large or multiply recurrent hernias. Transabdominal suture fixation to the bony and ligamentous structures produces a more durable hernia repair.

Keywords

Incisional hernia Suprapubic ventral hernia Parapubic hernia Pfannenstiel incision Laparoscopic repair Mesh fixation Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) 

References

  1. 1.
    Bendavid, R 1990Incisional parapubic herniasSurgery10898901Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DeMaria, EJ, Moss, JM, Sugerman, HJ 2000Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia: prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repairSurg Endosc14326329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    el Mairy, AB 1974A new procedure for the repair of suprapubic incisional herniaJ Med Liban27713718PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gecim, IE, Kocak, S, Ersoz, S, Bumin, C, Aribal, D 1996Recurrence after incisional hernia repair: results and risk factorsSurg Today26607609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffiths, DA 1976A reappraisal of the Pfannenstiel incisionBr J Urol48469474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heniford, BT, Park, A, Ramshaw, BJ, Voeller, G 2003Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive herniasAnn Surg238391399discussion 399-400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hirasa, T, Pickleman, J, Shayani, V 2001Laparoscopic repair of parapubic herniaArch Surg13613141317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koehler, RH, Voeller, G 1999Recurrences in laparoscopic incisional hernia repairs: a personal series and review of the literatureJSLS3293304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    LeBlanc, KA 2001The critical technical aspects of laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional herniasAm Surg67809812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lobel, RW, Sand, PK 1997Incisional hernia after suprapubic catheterizationObstet Gynecol89844846PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Losanoff, JE, Richman, BW, Jones, JW 2002Parapubic hernia: case report and review of the literatureHernia68285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luijendijk, RW, Jeekel, J, Storm, RK, Schutte, PJ, Hop, WC, Drogendijk, AC, Huikeshoven, FJ 1997The low transverse Pfannenstiel incision and the prevalence of incisional hernia and nerve entrapmentAnn Surg225365369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matuszewski, M, Stanek, A, Maruszak, H, Krajka, K 1999Laparoscopic treatment of parapubic postprostatectomy herniaEur Urol36418420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mudge, M, Hughes, LE 1985Incisional hernia: a 10-year prospective study of incidence and attitudesBr J Surg727071PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norris, JP, Flanigan, RC, Pickleman, J 1994Parapubic hernia following radical retropubic prostatectomyUrology44922923PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park, A, Birch, DW, Lovrics, P 1998Laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a comparison studySurgery124816821 discussion 821-822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pfannenstiel, H 1900Ueber die vortheile des suprasymphysaren fascienquerschnitts fur die gynakologischen koliotomienSamml Klin Vortr26817351756Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramshaw, BJ, Esartia, P, Schwab, J, Mason, EM, Wilson, RA, Duncan, TD, Miller, J,  et al. 1999Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphyAm Surg65827831discussion 831-832PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stoppa, RE 1989The treatment of complicated groin and incisional herniasWorld J Surg13545554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sugerman, HJ, Kellum, JM,Jr., Reines, HD, DeMaria, EJ, Newsome, HH, Lowry, JW 1996Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene meshAm J Surg1718084PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Carbonell
    • 1
  • K. W. Kercher
    • 1
  • B. D. Matthews
    • 1
  • R. F. Sing
    • 1
  • W. S. Cobb
    • 1
  • B. T. Heniford
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Department of General SurgeryCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations