Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques

, Volume 19, Issue 9, pp 1200–1203 | Cite as

Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery

  • A. Ayav
  • L. Bresler
  • J. Hubert
  • L. Brunaud
  • P. Boissel
Original article

Abstract

Background

This study describes technical aspect and short-term results of pelvic organ prolapse surgery using the da Vinci robotic system.

Methods

During a 1-year period, 18 consecutive patients with pelvic organ prolapse were operated on using the da-Vinci system. Clinical data were prospectively collected and analyzed.

Results

All but one procedure was successfully completed robotically (95%). Performed procedures were colpohysteropexy (n = 12), mesh rectopexy (n = 2), or sutured rectopexy combined with sigmoid resection (n = 4). Average setup time was 21 min and significantly decreased with experience. Mean operative time was 172 min (range, 45–280). There were no mortality and no specific morbidity due to the robotic approach. Mean hospital stay was 7 days. At 6 months, all patients were free of pelvic organ prolapse and stated that they were satisfied with anatomical and functional results.

Conclusion

Our experience indicates that using the da-Vinci robotic system is feasible, safe, and effective for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Keywords

Robotic surgery Da Vinci Rectal prolapse Genital prolapse 

References

  1. 1.
    Ayav, A, Bresler, L, Brunaud, L, Boissel, P 2004Early results of one year robotic surgery using the Da Vinci system to perform advanced laproscopic proceduresJ Gastrointest Surg8720726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker, R, Senagore, AJ, Luchtefeld, MA 1995Laparoscopic-assisted versus open resection: rectopexy offers excellent resultsDis Colon Rectum38199201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brunaud, L, Bresler, L, Ayav, A, Tretou, S, Cormier, L, Klein, M, Boissel, P 2003Advantages of using robotic Da Vinci system for unilateral adrenalectomy: early resultsAnn Chir128530535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cadière, GB, Himpens, J, Germay, O, Izizaw, R, Degueldre, M, Vandromme, J, Capelluto, E, Bruyns, J 2001Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 casesWorld J Surg2514671477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cuschieri, A, Shimi, SM, Vander Velpen, G, Banting, S, Wood, RA 1994Laparoscopic prosthesis fixation rectopexy for complete rectal prolapseBr J Surg81138139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Darzi, A, Henry, MM, Guillou, PJ, Shorvon, P, Monson, JR 1995Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapseSurg Endosc9301303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deen, KI, Grant, E, Billingham, C, Keighley, MRB 1994Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full thickness rectal prolapseBr J Surg81302304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dubuisson, JB, Jacob, S, Chapron, C, Fauconnier, A, Decuypere, F, Dubernard, G 2002Laparoscopic iliac colpo-uterine suspension for treatment of genital prolpase using two meshes: 47 first casesGynécol Obstét Fertil30114120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hashizume, M, Shimada, M, Tomikawa, M, Ikeda, Y, Takahashi, I, Abe, R, Koga, F, Gotoh, N, Konishi, K, Maehara, S, Sugimachi, K 2002Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical systemSurg Endosc1611871191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Himpens, J, Cadière, GB, Bruyns, J, Vertruyen, M 1999Laparoscopic rectopexy according to WellsSurg Endosc13139141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horgan, S, Vanuno, D 2001Robots in laparoscopic surgeryJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech11415419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kairaluoma, MV, Viljakka, MT, Kellokumpu, IH 2003Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short-term outcomeDis Colon Rectum46353360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kellokumpu, IH, Vironen, J, Scheinin, T 2000Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse. A prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel functionSurg Endosc14634640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, DS, Tsang, CB, Wong, WD, Lowry, AC, Goldberg, SM, Madoff, RD 1999Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and resultsDis Colon Rectum42460469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marana, HR, Andrade, JM, Marana, RR, Matheus Sala, M, Philbert, PM, Rodrigues, R 1999Vaginal hysterectomy for correcting genital prolapse. Long-term evaluationJ Reprod Med44529534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Margossian, H, Walters, MD, Falcone, T 1999Laparoscopic management of pelvic organ prolapseEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol855762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Melvin, WS, Needleman, BJ, Krause, KR, Schneider, C, Wolf, RK, Michler, RE, Ellison, EC 2002Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgeryInitial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc1617901792Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Munz, Y, Moorthy, K, Kudchadkar, R, Hernandez, JD, Martin, S, Darzi, A, Rockall, T 2004Robotic assisted rectopexyAm J Surg1878892CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Solomon, MJ, Young, CJ, Eyers, AA, Roberts, RA 2002Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapseBr J Surg893539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stevenson, AR, Stittz, RW, Lumley, JW 1998Laparoscopic-assisted resection-rectopexy for rectal prolapse: early and medium follow-upDis Colon Rectum414654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zittel, TT, Manncke, K, Haug, S, Schäfer, JF, Kreis, ME, Becker, HD, Jehle, EC 2000Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapseJ Gastrointest Surg4632641CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Ayav
    • 1
  • L. Bresler
    • 1
  • J. Hubert
    • 2
  • L. Brunaud
    • 1
  • P. Boissel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Digestive Surgery University Hospital of Nancy-BraboisFrance
  2. 2.Department of UrologyUniversity Hospital of Nancy-BraboisFrance

Personalised recommendations