Advertisement

Austrian experiences with redo antireflux surgery

  • H. WykypielEmail author
  • T. Kamolz
  • P. Steiner
  • A. Klingler
  • F. A. Granderath
  • R. Pointner
  • G. J. Wetscher
Original article

Abstract

Background

From 1996, the entire number of fundoplications performed in Austria increased dramatically, favoring the laparoscopic technique. Despite good results, some patients experience failure of antireflux surgery and therefore require redo surgery if medical therapy fails to control symptoms. The aim of the study was to describe the refundoplication policy in Austria with evaluation of the postoperative results.

Methods

A questionnaire was sent to all Austrian surgical departments at the beginning of 2003 with questions about redo fundoplications (number, techniques, intraoperative complications, history, migration of patients, preoperative workup, mortality, and postoperative long-term complaints). It also included questions about primary fundoplications (number, technique, postoperative symptoms).

Results

Out of 4,504 primary fundoplications performed in Austria since 1990, 3,952 have been carried out laparoscopically. In a median of 31 months after the primary operation, 225 refundoplications have been performed, laparoscopically in the majority of patients. The Nissen and the partial posterior fundoplication were the preferred techniques. The conversion rate in these was 10.8%, mainly because of adhesions and lacerations of the spleen, the stomach, and the esophagus. The mortality rate after primary fundoplications was 0.04%, whereas the rate after refundoplications was 0.4%, all resulting from an open approach.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic refundoplications are widely accepted as a treatment option after failed primary antireflux surgery in Austria. However, the conversion rate is 6 times higher and the mortality rate is 10 times higher than for primary antireflux surgery. Therefore, redo fundoplications should be performed only in departments with large experience.

Key words:

Gastroesophageal reflux Surgery Complications Fundoplication Esophagitis Esophagus 

References

  1. 1.
    Bammer T, Hinder RA, Klaus A, Klingler PJ (2001) Five- to eight-year outcome of the first laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications. J Gastrointest Surg 5: 42–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bammer T, Kamloz T, Pasiut M, Wetscher G, Pointner R (2002) Austrian experiences of antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 1350–1353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Floch NR, Hinder RA, Klingler PJ, Branton SA, Seelig MH, Bammer T, Filipi CJ (1999) Is laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux surgery feasible? Arch Surg 134: 733–737CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hinder RA, Filipi CJ, Wetscher G, Neary P, DeMeester TR, Perdikis G (1994) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 220: 472–481 discussion 481–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hinder RA, Klingler PJ, Perdikis G, Smith SL (1997) Management of the failed antireflux operation. Surg Clin North Am 77: 1083–1098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hunter JG, Smith CD, Branum GD, Waring JP, Trus TL, Cornwell M, Galloway K (1999) Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision. Ann Surg 230: 595–604 discussion 604–596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klingler P, Hinder R, DeVault K (1997) Gastroesophageal reflux: current controversies. In: Wiese L (ed) Crucial controversies in surgery 1997. Karger Landes Systems, Basel 118–131Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ludemann R, Watson DI, Jamieson GG (2003) Influence of follow-up methodology and completeness on apparent clinical outcome of fundoplication. Am J Surg 186: 143–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pointner R, Bammer T, Then P, Kamolz T (1999) Laparoscopic refundoplications after failed antireflux surgery. Am J Surg 178: 541–544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Feussner H (1995) Reoperations after failed antireflux procedures. Ann Chir Gynaecol 84: 122–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skinner DB (1992) Surgical management after failed antireflux operations. World J Surg 16: 359–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) (1998) Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) Surg Endosc 12: 186–188Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soper NJ, Dunnegan D (1999) Anatomic fundoplication failure after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg 229: 669–676, discussion 676-667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stein HJ, Feussner H, Siewert JR (1996) Failure of antireflux surgery: causes and management strategies. Am J Surg 171: 36–39, discussion 39–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Watson A, Jenkinson LR, Ball CS, Barlow AP, Norris TL (1991) A more physiological alternative to total fundoplication for the surgical correction of resistant gastrovoesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 78: 1088–1094PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Game PA, Williams RS, Devitt PG (1999) Laparoscopic reoperation following failed antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 86: 98–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wetscher GJ, Gadenstaetter M, Klingler PJ, Weiss H, Obrist P, Wykypiel H, Klaus A, Profanter C (2001) Efficacy of medical therapy and antireflux surgery to prevent Barrett’s metaplasia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 234: 627–632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Wykypiel
    • 1
    Email author
  • T. Kamolz
    • 2
  • P. Steiner
    • 1
  • A. Klingler
    • 1
  • F. A. Granderath
    • 2
  • R. Pointner
    • 2
  • G. J. Wetscher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General and Transplant SurgeryInnsbruck Medical UniversityAustria
  2. 2.General Hospital of Zell am SeeAustria

Personalised recommendations