Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery

  • D. Korolija
  • S. Sauerland
  • S. Wood-Dauphinée
  • C. C. Abbou
  • E. Eypasch
  • M. García. Caballero
  • M. A. Lumsden
  • B. Millat
  • J. R. T. Monson
  • G. Nilsson
  • R. Pointner
  • W. Schwenk
  • A. Shamiyeh
  • A. Szold
  • E. Targarona
  • B. Ure
  • E. Neugebauer
Review article

Abstract

Background

Measuring health-related quality of life (QoL) after surgery is essential for decision making by patients, surgeons, and payers. The aim of this consensus conference was twofold. First, it was to determine for which diseases endoscopic surgery results in better postoperative QoL than open surgery. Second, it was to recommend QoL instruments for clinical research.

Methods

An expert panel selected 12 conditions in which QoL and endoscopic surgery are important. For each condition, studies comparing endoscopic and open surgery in terms of QoL were identified. The expert panel reached consensus on the relative benefits of endoscopic surgery and recommended generic and disease-specific QoL instruments for use in clinical research.

Results

Randomized trials indicate that QoL improves earlier after endoscopic than open surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), cholecystolithiasis, colorectal cancer, inguinal hernia, obesity (gastric bypass), and uterine disorders that require hysterectomy. For spleen, prostate, malignant kidney, benign colorectal, and benign non-GERD esophageal diseases, evidence from nonrandomized trials supports the use of laparoscopic surgery. However, many studies failed to collect long-term results, used nonvalidated questionnaires, or measured QoL components only incompletely. The following QoL instruments can be recommended: for benign esophageal and gallbladder disease, the GIQLI or the QOLRAD together with SF-36 or the PGWB; for obesity surgery, the IWQOL-Lite with the SF-36; for colorectal cancer, the FACT-C or the EORTC QLQ-C30/CR38; for inguinal and renal surgery, the VAS for pain with the SF-36 (or the EORTC QLQ-C30 in case of malignancy); and after hysterectomy, the SF-36 together with an evaluation of urinary and sexual function.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic surgery provides better postoperative QoL in many clinical situations. Researchers would improve the quality of future studies by using validated QoL instruments such as those recommended here.

References

  1. 1.
    Aaronson, N, Cull, AM, Kaasa, S, Sprangers, MAJ 1996

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): modular approach to quality of life asessment in oncology.

    Spilker, B eds. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials.Lippincott-RavenPhiladelphia179189
    Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aaronson, NK, Ahmedzai, S, Bergman, B, Bullinger, M, Cull, A, Duez, NJ, Filiberti, A, Fletchner, H, Fleishman, SB, Haes, JCJM,  et al. 1993The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in International Clinical Trials in Oncology.J Natl Cancer Inst85365372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abbou, CC, Cicco, A, Gasman, D, Hoznek, A, Antiphon, P, Chopin, DK, Salomon, L 1999Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy.J Urol16117761780PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aitken, RCB 1969Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales.Proc R Soc Med62989993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bais, JE, Bartelsman, JF, Bonjer, HJ, Cuesta, MA, Go, PM, Klinkenberg-Knol, EC, Lanschot, JJ, Nadorp, JH, Smout, AJ, Graaf, Y, Gooszen, HG 2000Laparoscopic or conventional Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: randomised clinical trial. The Netherlands Antireflux Surgery Study Group.Lancet355170174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barkun, JS, Barkun, AN, Sampalis, JS, Fried, G, Taylor, B, Wexler, MJ, Goresky, CA, Meakins, JL 1992Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group.Lancet34011161119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barkun, JS, Wexler, MJ, Hinchey, EJ, Thibeault, D, Meakins, JL 1995Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniorrhaphy: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial.Surgery118703710PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergerer, KP, Bobbit, RA, Kressels, S, Pollard, WE, Gilson, BS, Morris, MR 1976The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure.Int J Health Sci6343415Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blomqvist, A, Lonroth, H, Dalenback, J, Ruth, M, Wiklund, I, Lundell, L 1996Quality of life assessment after laparoscopic and open fundoplications. Results of a prospective, clinical study.Scand J Gastroenterol3110521058PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boerma, D, Rauws, EA, Keulemans, YC, Bergman, JJ, Obertop, H, Huibregtse, K, Gouma, DJ 2001Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis.Ann Surg234750757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonomi, AE, Cella, DF, Hahn, EA, Bjordal, K, Sperner-Unterweger, B, Gangeri, L, Bergman, B, Willems-Groot, J, Hanquet, P, Zittoun, R 1996Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system.Qual Life Res5309320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bouillon, B, Neugebauer, E 1998Outcome after polytrauma.Langenbeck’s Arch Surg383228234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braga, M, Vignali, A, Gianotti, L, Zuliani, W, Radaelli, G, Gruarin, P, Dellabona, P, Di Carlo, V 2002Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.Ann Surg236759767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bremers, AJ, Ringers, J, Vijn, A, Janss, RA, Bemelman, WA 2000Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for chronic abdominal pain: an objective assessment.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A10199202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bringman, S, Ramel, S, Heikkinen, TJ, Englund, T, Westman, B, Anderberg, B 2003Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Ann Surg237142147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cella, DF 1994FACT manual: manual for the Function Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scales and the functional assessment of HIV infection (FAHI) scales.Rush–Presbyterian–St.Luke’s Medical CenterChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cella, DF, Tulsky, DS, Gray, G, Sarafian, B, Linn, E, Bonomi, A, Silberman, M, Yellen, SB, Winicour, P, Brannon, J,  et al. 1993The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure.J Clin Oncol11570579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cheek, CM, Black, NA, Devlin, HB, Kingsnorth, AN, Taylor, RS, Watkin, DF 1998Groin hernia surgery: a systematic review.Ann R Coll Surg England80S1S80Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen, L, Dai, N, Shi, X, Tao, S, Zhang, W 2002Life quality of patients after cholecystectomy.Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi40762765PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chrysos, E, Tsiaoussis, J, Athanasakis, E, Zoras, O, Vassilakis, JS, Xynos, E 2002Laparoscopic vs open approach for Nissen fundoplication. A comparative study.Surg Endosc1616791684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chung, RS, Rowland, DY 1999Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic vs conventional inguinal hernia repairs.Surg Endosc13689694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Croog, S, Levine, S, Testa, M, Brown, B, Bulpitt, C, Jenkins, D, Klerman, G, Williams, G 1986The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.N Engl J Med31416571664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Decker, G, Borie, F, Bouamrirene, D, Veyrac, M, Guillon, F, Fingerhut, A, Millat, B 2002Gastrointestinal quality of life before and after laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial posterior fundoplication.Ann Surg236750758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dempsey, DT, Kalan, MM, Gerson, RS, Parkman, HP, Maier, WP 1999Comparison of outcomes following open and laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia.Surg Endosc13747750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dimenas, E, Carlsson, G, Glise, H, Israelsson, B, Wiklund, I 1996Relevance of norm values as part of the documentation of quality of life instruments for use in upper gastrointestinal disease.Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl221813PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Donovan, JL, Peters, TJ, Abrams, P, Brookes, ST, Rosette, JJ, Schafer, W 2000Scoring the short form ICSmaleSF questionnaire. International Continence Society.J Urol16419481955CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dunker, MS, Bemelman, WA, Slors, JF, Duijvendijk, P, Gouma, DJ 2001Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study.Dis Colon Rectum4418001807PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dunker, MS, Stiggelbout, AM, Hogezand, RA, Ringers, J, Griffioen, G, Bemelman, WA 1998Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease.Surg Endosc1213341340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dupuy, HJ 1984

    The psychological General Well-being (PGWB) index.

    Wenger, NKMattson, MEFurberg, CFElinson, J eds. Assessments of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies.Le Jacq.170184
    Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ellström, M, Ferraz-Nunes, J, Hahlin, M, Olsson, JH 1998A randomized trial with a cost–consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.Obstet Gynecol913034CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eltabbakh, GH, Shamonki, MI, Moody, JM, Garafano, LL 2001Laparoscopy as the primary modality for the treatment of women with endometrial carcinoma.Cancer91378387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Erickson, P 1998Evaluation of a population-based measure of quality of life: the Health and Activity Limitation Index (HALex).Qual Life Res7101114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Esper, P, Mo, F, Chodak, G, Sinner, M, Cella, D, Pienta, KJ 1997Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy–prostate instrument.Urology50920928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    EuroQuol, Group 1990EuroQoul–a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life.Health Policy16199208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eypasch, E, Troidl, H, Wood-Dauphinée, S, Williams, JI, Reinecke, K, Ure, B, Neugebauer, E 1990Quality of life and gastrointestinal surgery: a clinimetric approach to developing an instrument for its measurement.Theor Surg5310Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eypasch, E, Troidl, H, Wood-Dauphinée, S, Williams, JI, Spangenberger, W, Ure, BM, Neugebauer, E 1993Immediate improval in quality of life after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Minimally Invasive Therapy2139146Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Eypasch, E, Williams, JI, Wood-Dauphinée, S, Ure, BM, Schmulling, C, Neugebauer, E, Troidl, H 1995Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument.Br J Surg82216222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Eypasch, E, Wood-Dauphinée, S, Williams, JI, Ure, B, Neugebauer, E, Troidl, H 1993Der Gastrointestinale Lebensqualitätsindex (GLQI). Ein klinimetrischer Index zur Befindlichkeitsmessung in der gastroenterologischen Chirurgie.Chirurg64264274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Falcone, T, Paraiso, MF, Mascha, E 1999Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy.Am J Obstet Gynecol180955962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Filipi, CJ, Gaston-Johansson, F, McBride, PJ, Murayama, K, Gerhardt, J, Cornet, DA, Lund, RJ, Hirai, D, Graham, R, Patil, K, Fitzgibbons, R,Jr, Gaines, RD 1996An assessment of pain and return to normal activity. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair.Surg Endosc10983986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fleming, WR, Elliott, TB, Jones, RM, Hardy, KJ 2001Randomized clinical trial comparing totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with the Shouldice technique.Br J Surg8811831188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Freys, SM, Tigges, H, Heimbucher, J, Fuchs, KH, Fein, M, Thiede, A 2001Quality of life following laparoscopic gastric banding in patients with morbid obesity.J Gastrointest Surg5401407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gill, IS, Schweizer, D, Hobart, MG, Sung, GT, Klein, EA, Novick, AC 2000Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland clinic experience.J Urol16316651670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gill, TM, Feinstein, AR 1994A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements.J Am Med Assoc272619626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gouma, DJ, Obertop, H 2002Quality of life after repair of bile duct injury.Br J Surg89385386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Guyatt, GH, Veldhuyzen Zanten, SJO, Feeny, DH, Patrick, DL 1989Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: a taxonomy and review.CMAJ14014411448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hara, I, Kawabata, G, Miyake, H, Nakamura, I, Hara, S, Okada, H, Kamidono, S 2003Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer.J Urol16920452048PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Heikkinen, TJ, Haukipuro, K, Bringman, S, Ramel, S, Sorasto, A, Hulkko, A 2000Comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication 2 years after operation. A prospective randomized trial.Surg Endosc1410191023CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Heikkinen, TJ, Haukipuro, K, Koivukangas, P, Sorasto, A, Autio, R, Sodervik, H, Makela, H, Hulkko, A 1999Comparison of costs between laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study with a 3-month follow-up.J Am Coll Surg188368376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hunt, SM, McEwen, J, McKenna, SP 1985Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists.J R Coll Gen Pract35185188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    IQOLA Project, Group 1998Special Issue on the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.J Clin Epidemiol518911214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jess, P, Christiansen, J, Bech, P 2002Quality of life after anterior resection versus abdominoperineal extirpation for rectal cancer.Scand J Gastroenterol3712011204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jones, KR, Burney, RE, Peterson, M, Christy, B 2001Return to work after inguinal hernia repair.Surgery129128135Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kald, A, Nilsson, E 1991Quality assessment in hernia surgery.Quality Assurance Health Care3205210Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kamolz, T, Granderath, FA, Pointner, R 2003Does major depression in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease affect the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery?Surg Endosc175560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kane, RL, Lurie, N, Borbas, C, Morris, N, Flood, S, McLaughlin, B, Nemanich, G, Schultz, A 1995The outcomes of elective laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies.J Am Coll Surg180136145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Katilius, M, Velanovich, V 2001Heller myotomy for achalasia: quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches.JSLS5227231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Katz, JN, Larson, MG, Phillips, CB, Fossel, AH, Liang, MH 1992Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments.Med Care30917925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kolmorgen, K, Beck, H, Seidenschnur, G 1991Postoperatives Beschwerdebild und Arbeitsun fähigkeit nach Adnex-Operation per laparotomiam und nach pelviskopischen Operationen.Zentralbl Gynäkol113625631Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kolotkin, RL, Crosby, RD 2002Psychometric evaluation of the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Questionnaire (IWQOL-lite) in a community sample.Quality Life Res11157171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kolotkin, RL, Crosby, RD, Kosloski, KD, Williams, GR 2001Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity.Obes Res9102111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kolotkin, RL, Crosby, RD, Williams, GR, Hartley, GG, Nicol, S 2001The relationship between health-related quality of life and weight loss.Obes Res9564571PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kolotkin, RL, Head, S, Brookhart, A 1997Construct validity of the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Questionnaire.Obes Res5434441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kolotkin, RL, Head, S, Hamilton, M, Tse, CK 1995Assessing Impact of Weight on Quality of Life.Obes Res34956Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Korenkov, M, Sauerland, S, Arndt, M, Bograd, L, Neugebauer, EAM, Troidl, H 2002Randomised clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia.Br J Surg895056Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Laine, S, Rantala, A, Gullichsen, R, Ovaska, J 1997Laparoscopic vs conventional Nissen fundoplication.A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc11441444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Landgraf, JM, Abetz, L, Ware, JE 1996The Child Health Questionnaire: a user’s manual.Health Institute, New England Medical CenterBostonGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Landgraf, JM, Maunsell, E, Speechley, KN, Bullinger, M, Campbell, S, Abetz, L, Ware, JE 1998Canadian–French, German and UK versions of the Child Health Questionnaire: methodology and preliminary item scaling results.Qual Life Res7433445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lawrence, K, McWhinnie, D, Goodwin, A, Doll, H, Gordon, A, Gray, A, Britton, J, Collin, J 1995Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results.Br Med J311981985Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lawrence, K, McWhinnie, D, Jenkinson, C, Coulter, A 1997Quality of life in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.Ann R Coll Surg Engl794045Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Liang, JT, Shieh, MJ, Chen, CN, Cheng, YM, Chang, KJ, Wang, SM 2002Prospective evaluation of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus laparotomy with resection for management of complex polyps of the sigmoid colon.World J Surg26377383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Liem, MS, Halsema, JA, Graaf, Y, Schrijvers, AJ, Vroonhoven, TJ 1997Cost-effectiveness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison with conventional herniorrhaphy. Coala trial group.Ann Surg226668676PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ludwig, K, Patel, K, Wilhelm, L, Bernhardt, J 2002Prospektive Analyse zur Outcomebewertung nach laparoskopischer versus konventioneller Cholecystektomie.Zentralbl Chir1274147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lumsden, MA, Twaddle, S, Hawthorn, R, Traynor, I, Gilmore, D, Davis, J, Deeny, M, Cameron, IT, Walker, JJ 2000A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.BJOG10713861391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Mattioli, G, Repetto, P, Carlini, C, Torre, M, Pini Prato, A, Mazzola, C, Leggio, S, Montobbio, G, Gandullia, P, Barabino, A, Cagnazzo, A, Sacco, O, Jasonni, V, Pini Prato, A 2002Laparoscopic vs open approach for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in children.Surg Endosc16750752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    McCorkle, R, Quint-Benoliel, J 1983Symptom distress, current concerns and mood disturbance after diagnosis of life-threatening disease.Soc Sci Med17431438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    McCormack, K, Scott, NW, Go, PMNYH, Ross, S, Grant, AM 2003

    Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair (Cochrane Review).

    Collaboration, C eds. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, Vol. 1/2003 [CD-ROM].Update SoftwareOxford, UK
    Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    McDougall, E, Clayman, RV, Elashry, OM 1996Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: the Washington University experience.J Urol15511801185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    McHorney, CA, Ware, JE,Jr, Lu, JF, Sherbourne, CD 1994The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.Med Care324066PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    McHorney, CA, Ware, JE,Jr, Raczek, AE 1993The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.Med Care31247263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    McMahon, AJ, Russell, IT, Baxter, JN, Ross, S, Anderson, JR, Morran, CG, Sunderland, G, Galloway, D, Ramsay, G, O’Dwyer, PJ 1994Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial.Lancet343135138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Melton, GB, Lillemoe, KD, Cameron, JL, Sauter, PA, Coleman, J, Yeo, CJ 2002Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life.Ann Surg235888895CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Meshkinpour, H, Haghighat, P, Meshkinpour, A 1996Quality of life among patients treated for achalasia.Dig Dis Sci41352356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Muir Gray, JA 1999Evidence-based healthcare2Churchill LivingstoneEdinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Naughton, MJ, Wiklund, I 1993A critical review of dimension-specific measures of health-related quality of life in cross-cultural research.Qual Life Res2397432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Neudecker, J, Sauerland, S, Neugebauer, E, Bergamaschi, R, Bonjer, HJ, Cuschieri, A, Fingerhut, A, Fuchs, KH, Jacobi, C, Jansen, FW, Koivusalo, AM, Lacy, A, McMahon, MJ, Millat, B, Schwenk, W 2002The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery.Surg Endosc1611211143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Neugebauer, ESauerland, STroidl, H eds. 2000Recommendations for evidence-based endoscopic surgery. The updated EAES consensus development conferences.SpringerParisGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Neugebauer, E, Troidl, H, Wood-Dauphinee, S, Eypasch, E, Bullinger, M 1991Quality-of-life assessment in surgery: results of the Meran consensus development conference.Theor Surg6123137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Nezhat, F, Nezhat, C, Gordon, S, Wilkins, E 1992Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.J Reproduct Med37247250Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Nguyen, NT, Goldman, C, Rosenquist, CJ, Arango, A, Cole, CJ, Lee, SJ, Wolfe, BM 2001Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs.Ann Surg234279291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Nilsson, G, Larsson, S, Johnsson, F 2002Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: evaluation of psychological well-being and changes in everyday life from a patient perspective.Scand J Gastroenterol37385391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Oria, HE, Moorehead, MK 1998Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS).Obes Surg8487499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Pace, KT, Dyer, SJ, Stewart, RJ, Honey, RJ, Poulin, EC, Schlachta, CM, Mamazza, J 2003Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open nephrectomy.Surg Endosc17143152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Pelgrims, N, Closset, J, Sperduto, N, Gelin, M, Houben, JJ 2001What did the laparoscopic Nissen approach of the gastro-oesophageal reflux really change for the patients 8 years later?Acta Chir Belgium1016872Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Pencharz, J, Young, NL, Owen, JL, Wright, JG 2001Comparison of three outcomes instruments in children.J Pediatr Orthop21425432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Peters, JH, Heimbucher, J, Kauer, WK, Incarbone, R, Bremner, CG, DeMeester, TR 1995Clinical and physiologic comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication.J Am Coll Surg180385393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Pfeifer, J, Wexner, SD, Reissman, P, Bernstein, M, Nogueras, JJ, Singh, S, Weiss, E 1995Laparoscopic vs open colon surgery. Costs and outcome.Surg Endosc913221326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Plaisier, PW 1997Incidence of persistent symptoms after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Gut41579Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Quintana, JM, Cabriada, J, Aróstegui, I, López Tejada, I, Bilbao, A 2003Quality-of-life outcomes with laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc..Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Quintana, JM, Cabriada, J, López Tejada, I, Varona, M, Oribe, V, Barriós, B, Perdigo, L, Bilbao, A 2001Translation and validation of the gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI).Rev Esp Enferm Dig93693706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Raju, KS, Auld, BJ 1994A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.BJOG10110681071Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Rantanen, TK, Salo, JA, Salminen, JT, Kellokumpu, IH 1999Functional outcome after laparoscopic or open Nissen fundoplication: a follow-up study.Arch Surg134240244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Rattner, DW, Brooks, DC 1995Patient satisfaction following laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery.Arch Surg130289294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Reading, AE 1989

    Testing pain mechanisms in persons in pain.

    Wall, PMelzack, R eds. Textbook of pain.2Churchill LivingstoneNew York269280
    Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Revicki, DA, Wood, M, Wiklund, I, Crawley, J 1998Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.Qual Life Res77583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Richards, KF, Fisher, KS, Flores, JH, Christensen, BJ 1996Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: cost, morbidity, and outcome compared with open surgery.Surg Laparosc Endosc6140143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Roblick, UJ, Massmann, A, Schwandner, O, Sterk, P, Krug, F, Bruch, HP, Schiedeck, TH 2002Lebensqualitat nach chirurgischer Therapie einer Divertikulitis: Ergebnisse im Follow-up.Zentralbl Chir1273135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Rockwood, TH, Church, JM, Fleshman, JW, Kane, RL, Mavrantonis, C, Thorson, AG, Wexner, SD, Bliss, D, Lowry, AC 2000Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.Dis Colon Rectum43917PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Rosen, RC, Cappelleri, JC, Smith, MD, Lipsky, J, Pena, BM 1999Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction.Int J Impot Res11319326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Sackett, DL, Strauss, DE, Richardson, WS, Rosenberg, W, Haynes, RB 2000Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM2Churchill LivingstoneLondonGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Sanabria, JR, Clavien, PA, Cywes, R, Strasberg, SM 1993Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a matched study.Can J Surg36330336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Sarli, L, Iusco, DR, Sansebastiano, G, Costi, R 2001Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias: a prospective, randomized study of open, tension-free versus laparoscopic approach.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech11262267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Schmedt, CG, Leibl, BJ, Bittner, R 2002Endoscopic inguinal hernia repair in comparison with Shouldice and Lichtenstein repair: a systematic review of randomized trials.Dig Surg19511517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Schütz, K, Possover, M, Merker, A, Michels, W, Schneider, A 2002Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for the treatment of the uterus weighing >200 g.Surg Endosc16121125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Schwenk, W, Böhm, B, Müller, JM 1998Laparoskopische oder konventionelle kolorektale Resektionen: Beeinflusst die Operationstechnik die postoperative Lebensqualität?Zentralbl Chir123483490Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust2002Assessing health status and quality-of-life: attributes and criteria.Qual Life Res11193205Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Slim, K, Bousquet, J, Kwiatkowski, F, Lescure, G, Pezet, D, Chipponi, J 1999First validation of the French version of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI).Gastroenterol Clin Biol232531PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Spirtos, NM, Schlaerth, JB, Gross, GM, Spirtos, TW, Schlaerth, AC, Ballon, SC 1996Cost and quality-of-life analyses of surgery for early endometrial cancer, laparotomy versus laparoscopy.Am J Obstet Gynecol17417951800Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Spitzer, WO, Dobson, AJ, Hall, J 1981Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-Index for use by physicians.J Chronic Dis34585597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Sprangers, MA, te Velde, A, Aaronson, NK 1999The construction and testing of the EORTC coldrectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life.Eur J Cancer35238247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Stengel, D, Lange, V 1998Lebensqualität nach Leistenhernienoperation—Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie (Shouldice, Lichtenstein, TAPP).Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd11510201023PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Svedlund, J, Sjödin, I, Dotevall, G 1988GSRS—a clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease.Dig Dis Sci33129134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Talley, N, Fullerton, S, Junghard, O, Wiklund, I 2001Quality of life in patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn: reliability and sensitivity of disease-specific instruments.Am J Gastroenterol9619982004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Topcu, O, Karakayali, F, Kuzu, MA, Ozdemir, S, Erverdi, N, Elhan, A, Aras, N 2003Comparison of long-term quality of life after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc17291295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Tschudi, JF, Wagner, M, Klaiber, C, Brugger, JJ, Frei, E, Krahenbühl, L, Inderbitzi, R, Boinski, J, Hsu Schmitz, SF, Husler, J 2001Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice repair.Surg Endosc1512631266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Tsevat, J, Dawson, NV, Matchar, DB 1990Assessing quality of life and preferences in the seriously ill using utility theory.J Clin Epidemiol4373S77SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Varni, JW, Burwinkle, TM, Katz, ER, Meeske, K, Dickinson, P 2002The PedsQL in pediatric cancer: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales, Multidimensional Fatigue Scale, and Cancer Module.Cancer9420902106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Varni, JW, Seid, M, Kurtin, PS 2001PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations.Med Care39800812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Varni, JW, Seid, M, Rode, CA 1999The PedsQL: measurement model for the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory.Med Care37126139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Velanovich, V 1999Comparison of symptomatic and quality of life outcomes of laparoscopic versus open antireflux surgery.Surgery126782789Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Velanovich, V, Karmy-Jones, R 2001Surgical management of paraesophageal hernias: outcome and quality of life analysis.Dig Surg18432438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Velanovich, V, Shurafa, MS 2001Clinical and quality of life outcomes of laparoscopic and open splenectomy for haematological diseases.Eur J Surg1672328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Velanovich, V, Vallance, SR, Gusz, JR, Tapia, FV, Harkabus, MA 1996Quality of life scale for gastroesophageal reflux disease.J Am Coll Surg183217224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Visick, A 1948Measured radical gastrectomy: review of 505 operations for peptic ulcer.Lancet1505510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Ward, WL, Hahn, EA, Mo, F, Hernandez, L, Tulsky, DS, Cella, D 1999Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument.Qual Life Res8181195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Ware, J, Gandek, B 1998Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.J Clin Epidemiol51903912CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Ware, JE, Kosinski, M, Keller, SD 1999SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual.Health Institute, New England Medical CenterBostonGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Ware, JE, Sherbourne, CD 1992The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.Med Care30473483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Waters, EB, Salmon, LA, Wake, M 2000The parent-form Child Health Questionnaire in Austalia: comparison of reliability, validity structure and norms.J Pediatr Psychol25381391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Waters, EB, Salmon, LA, Wake, M, Weight, M, Hesketh, KD 2001The health and well-being of adolescents: a school-based population study of the self-report Child Health Questionnaire.J Adolesc Health29140149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Weeks, JC, Nelson, H, Gelber, S, Sargent, D, Schroeder, G 2002Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscppic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.J Am Med Assoc287321328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Wellwood, J, Sculpher, MJ, Stoker, D, Nicholls, GJ, Geddes, C, Whitehead, A, Singh, R, Spiegelhalter, D 1998Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost.Br Med J317103110Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Wenner, J, Nilsson, G, Oberg, S, Melin, T, Larsson, S, Johnsson, F 2001Short-term outcome after laparoscopic and open 360 fundoplication.Surg Endosc.11241128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Westling, A, Gustavsson, S 2001Laparoscopic vs open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized trial.Obes Surg11284292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Wiebe, S, Guyatt, G, Weaver, B, Matijevic, S, Sidweli, C 2003Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments.J Clin Epidemiol565260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Wiklund, IK, Junghard, O, Grace, E, Talley, NJ, Kamm, M, Veldhuyzen Zanten, S, Pare, P, Chiba, N, Leddin, DS, Bigard, MA, Colin, R, Schoenfeld, P 1998Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia patients. Psychometric documentation of a new disease-specific questionnaire (QOLRAD).Eur J Surg Suppl5834149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Zigmond, AS, Snaith, RP 1983The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.Acta Psychiatr Scand67361370PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Korolija
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Sauerland
    • 2
  • S. Wood-Dauphinée
    • 3
  • C. C. Abbou
    • 4
  • E. Eypasch
    • 5
  • M. García. Caballero
    • 6
  • M. A. Lumsden
    • 7
  • B. Millat
    • 8
  • J. R. T. Monson
    • 9
  • G. Nilsson
    • 10
  • R. Pointner
    • 11
  • W. Schwenk
    • 12
  • A. Shamiyeh
    • 13
  • A. Szold
    • 14
  • E. Targarona
    • 15
  • B. Ure
    • 16
  • E. Neugebauer
    • 2
  1. 1.University Surgical ClinicClinical Hospital Center ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Biochemical and Experimental Division, 2nd Department of SurgeryUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Physical and Occupational TherapyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Department of UrologyCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri MondorCreteilFrance
  5. 5.Surgical DepartmentMalteser-Krankenhaus St. HildegardisCologneGermany
  6. 6.Department of SurgeryMálaga UniversityMálagaSpain
  7. 7.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology3rd Floor, Queen Elizabeth Building, Royal InfirmaryGlasgowUnited Kingdom
  8. 8.Department of Abdominal SurgeryHòpital Saint Eloi (CHU) 2France
  9. 9.Academic Surgical UnitUniversity of Hull, Castle Hill HospitalCottinghamUnited Kingdom
  10. 10.Department of NursingLund UniversityLundSweden
  11. 11.Department of General SurgeryZell am See HospitalZell am SeeAustria
  12. 12.Department of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Thoracic SurgeryCampus Charité MitteBerlinGermany
  13. 13.Ludwig–Boltzmann Institute for Surgical Laparoscopy, 2nd Department of SurgeryLinz General HospitalLinzAustria
  14. 14.Department of Surgery BSourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
  15. 15.Department of General and Digestive SurgeryHospital de Sant Pau C/Padre Claret 167BarcelonaSpain
  16. 16.Department of Paediatric SurgeryMedical University of HannoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations