The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: Increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient?
Original article First Online: 23 June 2004 Received: 23 July 2003 Accepted: 15 January 2004 Abstract Background
The aim of this study was to examine the advantages and risks of the Automated Endoscopic System for Optical Positioning (AESOP) 3000 robot system during uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomies or laparoscopic hernioplasty.
In a randomized study, we examined two groups of 120 patients each with the diagnosis cholecystolithiasis respectively the unilateral inguinal hernia. We worked with the AESOP 3000, a robotic arm system that is voice-controlled by the surgeon. The subjective and objective comfort of the surgeon as well as the course and length of the operation were measured.
The robot-assisted operations required significantly longer preparation and operation times. With regard to the necessary commands and manual camera corrections, the assistant group was favored. The same was true for the subjective evaluation of the surgical course by the surgeon.
Our study showed that the use of AESOP during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hernioplasty is possible in 94% of all cases. The surgeon must accept a definite loss of comfort as well as a certain loss of time against the advantage of saving on personnel.
Keywords Robotics AESOP robot system Laparoscopic procedures Transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair Laparoscopic cholecystectomy References
Aiono, S, Gilbert, JM, Soin, B, Finlay, PA, Gordan, A 2002 Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 16 1267 1270 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Allaf, ME, Jackman, SV, Schulam, PG, Cadeddu, JA, Lee, BR, Moore, RG, Kavoussi, LR 1998 Laparoscopic visual field: voice vs foot pedal interfaces for control of the AESOP robot Surg Endosc 12 1415 1418 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Arezzo, A, Ulmer, F, Weiss, O, Schurr, MO, Hamad, M, Buess, GF 2000 Experimental trial on solo surgery for minimally invasive therapy: comparison of different systems in a phantom model Surg Endosc 14 955 959 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Baca, I 1997 Roboterarm in der laparoskopischen Chirurgie Chirurg 68 837 839 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Ballantyne, GH 2002 Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telemonitoring: review of early clinical results Surg Endosc 16 1389 1402 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Begin, E, Gagner, M, Hurteau, R, Santis, S, Pomp, A 1995 A robotic camera for laparoscopic surgery: conception and experimental results Surg Laparosc Endosc 5 6 11 PubMed Google Scholar
Boer, KT, Bruijn, M, Jaspers, JE, Stassen, LP, Erp, WF, Jansen, A, Go, PM, et al. 2002 Time–action analysis of instrument positioners in laparoscopic cholecystectomie Surg Endosc 16 142 147 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Dunlap, KD, Wanzer, L 1998 Is the robotic arm a cost-effective surgical tool? Aorn J 68 265 272 PubMed Google Scholar
Esumi, G, Tomikawa, M, Hashizume, M, Konishi, K, Shimada, M, Sugimachi, K 2001 Current status and future of surgical robotic systems Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 92 315 318 PubMed Google Scholar
Imme, A, Caglia, P, Gandolfo, L, Cavallaro, G, et al. 2002 Robotic techniques in laparoscopic surgery Chir Ital 54 111 113 PubMed Google Scholar
Jacobs, LK, Shayani, V, Sackier, JM 1997 Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot Surg Endosc 11 54 55 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kasalicky, MA, Svab, J, Fried, M, Melechovsky, D 2002 AESOP 3000—computer-assisted surgery, personal experience Rozhl Chir 81 346 349 PubMed Google Scholar
Köninger, J, Butters, M 2001 Laparoskopische Leistenhernienchirurgie mit dem Roboterarm Min Invas Chir 10 27 30 Google Scholar
Kondraske, GV, Hamilton, EC, Scott, DJ, Fischer, CA, Tesfay, ST, Taneja, R, Brown, RJ, et al. 2002 Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control Surg Endosc 16 1523 1527 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Mettler, L, Ibrahim, M, Jonat, W 1998 One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery Hum Reprod 13 2748 2750 PubMed Google Scholar
Moran, ME 1993 Stationary and automated laparoscopically assisted technologies J Laparoendosc Surg 3 221 227 PubMed Google Scholar
Niebuhr, H, Born, O 2000 Image Tracking System Eine neue Technik für die sichere und kostensparende laparoskopische Operation Chirurg 71 580 584 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Okada, S, Tanaba, Y, Yamauchi, H, Sato, S 1998 Single-surgeon thorackoscopic surgery with a voice-controlled robot Lancet 351 1249 CrossRef Google Scholar
Reichenspurner, H, Boehm, DH, Welz, A, Schulze, C, Zwissler, B, Reichart, B 1998 3D-video- and robot-assisted minimally invasive ASD closure using the port-access technique Heart Surg Forum 1 104 106 PubMed Google Scholar
Reichenspurner, H, Boehm, DH, Gulbins, H, Schulze, C, Wildhirt, S, Welz, A, Detter, C, et al. 2000 Three-dimensional video and robot-assisted port-access mitral valve operation Ann Thorac Surg 69 1176 1182 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Turner, DJ, Semm, K 2000 The role of computers and robotics in endoscopic surgery Surg Technol Int 8 23 27 Google Scholar
Yavuz, Y, Ystgaard, B, Skogvoll, E, Marvik, R 2000 A comparative experimental study evaluating the performance of surgical robots AESOP and Endosista Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10 163 167 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar