Advertisement

Laparoscopic resection of the pancreas: a feasibility study of the short-term outcome

  • B. Edwin
  • T. MalaEmail author
  • Ø. Mathisen
  • I. Gladhaug
  • T. Buanes
  • O. C. Lunde
  • O. Søreide
  • A. Bergan
  • E. Fosse
Original article

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic resection is not an established treatment for tumors of the pancreas. We report our preliminary experience with this innovative approach to pancreatic disease. Methods: Thirty two patients with pancreatic disease were included in the study on an intention-to-treat basis. The preoperative indications for surgery were as follows: neuroendocrine tumors (n=13), unspecified tumors (n=11), cysts (n=2), idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura with ectopic spleen (n=2), annular pancreas (n=1), trauma (n=1), aneurysm of the splenic artery (n=1), and adenocarcinoma (n=1). Results: Enucleations (n=7) and distal pancreatectomy with (n=12) and without splenectomy (n=5) were performed. Three patients underwent laparoscopic exploration only. Four procedures (13%) were converted to an open technique. One resection was converted to a hand-assisted procedure. The mortality rate for patients undergoing laparoscopic resection was 8.3% (two of 24). Complications occurred after resection in nine of 24 procedures (38%). The median hospital stay was 5.5 days (range, 2–22). Postoperatively, opioid medication was given for a median of 2 days (range, 0–13). Conclusion: Resection of the pancreas can be performed safely via the laparoscopic approach with all the potential benefits to the patients of minimally invasive surgery.

Keywords

Laparoscopic surgery Pancreas Short-term outcome Pancreatectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Conlon, KC, Labow, D, Leung, D, Smith, A, Jarnagin, W, Coit, DG, Merchant, N, Brennan, MF 2001Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection.Ann Surg234487494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cuschieri, A, Jacomowics, JJ, van Spreeuwel, J 1996Laparoscopic distal 70% pancreatectomy and splenectomy for chronic pancreatitis.Ann Surg223280285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fabre, JM, Dulucq, JL, Vacher, C, Lemoine, MC, Wintringer, P, Nocca, D, Burgel, JS, Domergue, J 2002Is laparoscopic left pancreatic resection justified?SurgEndosc1613581361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fahy, BN, Frey, CF, HO, HS, Beckett, L, Bold, RJ 2002Morbidity, mortality and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy.Am J Surg183237241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernandez-Cruz, L, Saénz, A, Austudillo , E, Pantoja, JP, Uzca’tegui, E, Navarro, S 2002Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery in patients with chronic pancreatitis.SurgEndosc1619961003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fernandez-Cruz, L, Saénz, A, Astudillo , E, Martinez, I, Hoyos, S, Pantoja, JP, Navarro, S 2002Outcome of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: endocrine and nonendocrine tumours.World J Surg2610571065CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hirshberg, B, Libutti, SK, Alexander, HR, Bartlett, DL, Cochran, C, Livi, A, Chang, R, Shawker, T, Skarulis, MC, Gorden, P 2002Blind distal pancreatectomy for occult insulinoma: an inadvisable procedure.J Am Coll Surg194761764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Machado, MC, da Cunha, JC, Jukemura, J, Bacchella, T, Penteado, S, Abdo, EE, Machado, MA, Herman, P, Montagnini, AL, Pinotti, H 2001Insulinoma: diagnostic strategies and surgical treatment. A 22-year experience.Hepato-gastroenterology48854858PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahon, D, Allen, E, Rhodes, M 2002Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: three cases of insulinoma.Surg Endosc16700702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park, A, Schwartz, R, Tendan, V, Anvari, M 1999Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery.Am J Surg177158163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park, AE, Heniford, BT 2002Therapeutic laparoscopy of the pancreas.Ann Surg236149158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patterson, EJ, Gagner, M, Salky, B, Inabner, WB, Brower, S, Edye, M, Gurland, B, Reiner, M, Pertsemlides, D 2001Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: single-institution experience of 19 patients.J Am Coll Surg1931281287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sheehan, MK, Beck, K, Creech, S, Pickleman, J, Aranha, GV 2002Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation?Am Surg68267268Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shoup, M, Brennan, MF, McWhite, K, Leung, DH, Klimstra, D, Conlon, KC 2002The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy.Arch Surg137164168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Warshaw, AL 1988Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy.Arch Surg123550553PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Edwin
    • 1
  • T. Mala
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ø. Mathisen
    • 1
  • I. Gladhaug
    • 1
  • T. Buanes
    • 2
  • O. C. Lunde
    • 3
  • O. Søreide
    • 4
  • A. Bergan
    • 1
  • E. Fosse
    • 1
  1. 1.Interventional Center and Surgical DepartmentRikshospitalet, OsloNorway
  2. 2.Ullevål University Hospital, OsloNorway
  3. 3.Aker University Hospital, OsloNorway
  4. 4.Center for Health Technology Assessment, Sintef, 0314, OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations