Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery

  • A. J. KarayiannakisEmail author
  • A. Polychronidis
  • S. Perente
  • S. Botaitis
  • C. Simopoulos
Original article


Background: Previous abdominal surgery has been reported as a relative contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study specifically examined the effect of previous intraabdominal surgery on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Data from 1,638 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were reviewed and analyzed for open conversion rates, operative times, intra- and postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Results: Of the 1,638 study patients 473 (28.9%) had undergone previous abdominal surgery: 58 upper and 415 lower abdominal operations. The 262 patients who had undergone only a previous appendectomy were excluded from further analysis. Adhesions were found in 70.7%, 58.8% and 2.1% of patients respectively, who had previous upper, lower or no previous abdominal surgery with adhesiolysis required, respectively, in 78%, 30% and 0% of these cases. There were no complications directly attributable to adhesiolysis. Patients with previous upper abdominal surgery had a longer operating time (66.4 ± 34.2 min), a higher open conversion rate (19%), a higher incidence of postoperative wound infection (5.2%), and a longer postoperative stay (3.4 ± 2.1 days) than those who had undergone previous lower abdominal surgery (50.8 ± 24 min, 3.3%, 0.7%, and 2.6 ± 1.4 days, respectively) and those without prior abdominal surgery (47.4 ± 25.6 min, 5.4%, 1.2%, and 2.8 ± 1.9 days, respectively). Conclusions: Previous abdominal operations, even in the upper abdomen, are not a contraindication to safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, previous upper abdominal surgery is associated with an increased need for adhesiolysis, a higher open conversion rate, a prolonged operating time, an increased incidence of postoperative wound infection, and a longer postoperative stay.


Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Adhesions Complications Abdominal surgery 



The authors thank Professor A. Zbar, University of the West Indies, Barbados, for critical revision of the manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Alponat, A, Kum, CK, Koh, BC, Rajnakova, A, Goh, PM 1997Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.World J Surg21629633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caprini, JA, Arcelus, JA, Swanson, J, Coats, R, Hoffman, K, Brosnan, JJ, Blattner, S 1995The ultrasonic localization of abdominal wall adhesions.Surg Endosc9283285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Childers, JM, Brzechffa, PR, Surwit, EA 1993Laparoscopy using the left upper quadrant as the primary trocar site.Gynecol Oncol50221225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diez, J, Delbene, R, Ferreres, A 1998The feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery.HPB Surg10353356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldstein, SL, Matthews, BD, Sing, RF, Kercher, KW, Heniford, BT 2001Lateral approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the previously operated abdomen.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A11183186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hutchinson, CH, Traverso, LW, Lee, FT 1994Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preoperative factors predict the need to convert to open?Surg Endosc8875878PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kolecki, RV, Golub, RM, Sigel, B, Machi, J, Kitamura, H, Hosokawa, T, Justin, J, Schwartz, J, Zaren, HA 1994Accuracy of viscera slide detection of abdominal wall adhesions by ultrasound.Surg Endosc8871874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar, SS 1998Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the densely scarred abdomen.Am Surg6410941096PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marcovich, R, Del Terzo, MA, Wolf Jr, JS 2000Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic access techniques: Optiview visualizing trocar and Veress needle.J Endourol14175179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayol, J, Garcia-Aguilar, J, Ortiz-Oshiro, E, De-Diego Carmona, JA, Fernandez-Represa, JA 1997Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion.World J Surg21529533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller, K, Hölbling, N, Hutter, J, Junger, W, Moritz, E, Speil, T 1993Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients who have had previous abdominal surgery.Surg Endosc7400403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohl, DA, Faerber, GJ, Hurd, WW 1994Urologic laparoscopy with a new blunt-tipped trocar: safe, rapid access without the use of fascial sutures.Urology43861864PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schirmer, BD, Dix, J, Schmieg Jr, RE, Aguilar, M, Urch, S 1995The impact of previous abdominal surgery on outcome following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc910851089PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schrenk, P, Woisetschlager, R, Rieger, R, Wayand, WU 1998A diagnostic score to predict the difficulty of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy from preoperative variables.Surg Endosc12148150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waxman, K, Birkett, DH, Sackier, JM, Este-McDonald, J, Duquette, J 1994Clinical and laboratory evaluation of an electrosurgical laparoscopic trocar.Surg Endosc810761079PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolf Jr, JS 1997Laparoscopic access with a visualizing trocar.Tech Urol33437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wongworawat, MD, Aitken, DR, Robles, AE, Garberoglio, C 1994The impact of prior intraabdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Am Surg60763766PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu, SC, Chen, SC, Wang, SM, Wei, TC 1994Is previous abdominal surgery a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy?J Laparoendosc Surg43135PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Karayiannakis
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Polychronidis
    • 1
  • S. Perente
    • 1
  • S. Botaitis
    • 1
  • C. Simopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.Second Department of SurgeryDemocritus University of Thrace, Medical School, 6 I. Kaviri Street, 68 100 AlexandroupolisGreece

Personalised recommendations