Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques

, Volume 18, Issue 9, pp 1316–1322 | Cite as

Pneumoperitoneum and peritoneal surface changes: a review

Review article

Abstract

Background

Recent evidence suggests that the use of carbon dioxide to create a pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy can lead to adverse structural, metabolic, and immune derangements within the peritoneal cavity, and that these can be dependent on the specific insufflation gas used. These changes include structural alterations in the mesothelial lining, pH disturbances, and alterations in peritoneal macrophage responsiveness. This contrasts with an apparent systemic benefit associated with laparoscopic, as compared with open, surgery.

Methods

Recently published clinical and experimental studies related to the effect of pneumoperitoneum on the peritoneal surface are reviewed, and their relevance is discussed.

Results

Structural changes in the peritoneal mesothelial surface layer such as widening of the intercellular junctions can be demonstrated with electron microscopy. Acidification of the peritoneum in response to carbon dioxide insufflation occurs not only at the peritoneal surface, but also in the underlying connective tissue, resulting in disturbances in the electrical surface charge and the release of various immune mediators such as endotoxin. Pneumoperitoneum also affects the local peritoneal immune environment resulting in alterations in cytokine production and phagocytic function, as well as diminished antitumor cell cytotoxicity.

Conclusions

Ultrastructural, metabolic, and immune alterations are observed at the peritoneal surface in response to a pneumoperitoneum. Experimental evidence suggests that these changes are carbon dioxide–specific effects. The consequences of these alterations to the local peritoneal environment are not well understood, but they may facilitate tumor implantation within the peritoneal cavity and adversely affect the ability to clear intraperitoneal infections. Further investigation into this area is warranted.

Keywords

Laparoscopy pneumoperitoneum Insufflation gasses Carbon dioxide peritoneum 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Mouton for providing the electron micrographs.

References

  1. 1.
    Allendorf, JD, Bessler, M, Horvath, KD, Marvin, MR, Laird, DA, Whelan, RL 1999Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs laparoscopic surgery in mice may be related to differences in postoperative T-cell function.Surg Endosc13233235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allendorf, JD, Bessler, M, Kayton, ML, Oesterling, SD, Treat, MR, Nowygrod, R, Whelan, RL 1995Increased tumor establishment and growth after laparotomy vs laparoscopy in a murine model.Arch Surg130649653PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allendorf, JD, Bessler, M, Kayton, ML, Whelan, RL, Treat, MR, Nowygrod, R 1995Tumor growth after laparotomy or laparoscopy: a preliminary study.Surg Endosc94952CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allendorf, JD, Bessler, M, Whelan, RL, Trokel, M, Laird, DA, Terry, MB, Treat, MR 1996Better preservation of immune function after laparoscopic-assisted vs open bowel resection in a murine model.Dis Colon Rectum39S67S72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beart, RWJ 1994Laparoscopic colectomy: status of the art.Dis Colon Rectum37S47S49Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berman, IR 1995Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: some cause for pause.Ann Surg Oncol212Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bessell, JR, Ludbrook, G, Millard, SH, Baxter, PS, Ubhi, SS, Maddern, GJ 1999Humidified gas prevents hypothermia induced by laparoscopic insufflation.Surg Endosc13101105Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bongard, FS, Pianim, N, Lui, SY 1991Using helium for insufflation during laparoscopy.JAMA2663131Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bouvy, ND, Marquet, RL, Hamming, JF, Jeekel, J, Bonjer, HJ 1996Laparoscopic surgery in the rat: beneficial effect on body weight and tumor take.Surg Endosc10490494Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouvy, ND, Marquet, RL, Jeekel, J, Bonjer, HJ 1997Laparoscopic surgery is associated with less tumor growth stimulation than conventional surgery: an experimental study.Br J Surg84358361Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brune, IB, Wilke, W, Hensler, T, Feussner, H, Holzmann, B, Siewert, JR 1998Normal T lymphocyte and monocyte function after minimally invasive surgery.Surg Endosc1210201024Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carswell, EA, Old, LJ, Kassel, RL, Green, S, Fiore, N, Williamson, B 1975An endotoxin-induced serum factor that causes necrosis of tumors.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA7236663670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chapman, AE, Levitt, MD, Hewett, P, Woods, R, Sheiner, H, Maddern, GJ 2001Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies: a systematic review.Ann Surg234590606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chekan, EG, Nataraj, C, Clary, EM, Hayward, TZ, Brody, FJ, Stamat, JC, Fina, MC, Eubanks, WS, Westcott, CJ 1999Intraperitoneal immunity and pneumoperitoneum.Surg Endosc1311351138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Collet, D, Vitale, GC, Reynolds, M, Klar, E, Cheadle, WG 1995Peritoneal host defenses are less impaired by laparoscopy than by open operation.Surg Endosc910591064PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cushieri, A, Buess, G 1992

    Introduction and historical aspects.

    Cushieri, ABuess, GPerissat, J eds. Operative manual of endoscopic surgery.Springer VerlagNew York15
    Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eilber, FR, Morton, DL 1970Impaired immunologic reactivity and recurrence following cancer surgery.Cancer25362367Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Evrard, S, Falkenrodt, A, Park, A, Tassetti, V, Mutter, D, Marescaux, J 1997Influence of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on systemic and peritoneal cell-mediated immunity.World J Surg21353356Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Griffith, JP, Everitt, NJ, Lancaster, F, Boylston, A, Richards, SJ, Scott, CS, Benson, EA, Sue Ling, HM, McMahon, MJ 1995Influence of laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy upon cell-mediated immunity.Br J Surg82677680Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hazebroek, EJ, Color Study, Group 2002COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer.Surg Endosc16949953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heel, KA, Hall, JC 1996Peritoneal defenses and peritoneum-associated lymphoid tissue.Br J Surg8310311036Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hewett, PJ, Thomas, WM, King, G, Eaton, M 1996Intraperitoneal cell movement during abdominal carbon dioxide insufflation and laparoscopy: an in vivo model.Dis Colon Rectum39S62S66Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jacobi, CA, Wenger, F, Sabat, R, Volk, T, Ordemann, J, Muller, JM 1998The impact of laparoscopy with carbon dioxide versus helium on immunologic function and tumor growth in a rat model.Dig Surg15110116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnson, PL, Sibert, KS 1997Laparoscopy: gasless vs CO2 pneumoperitoneum.J Reprod Med42255259Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jones, AL, Selby, P 1980Clinical applications of tumour necrosis factor.Prog Growth Factor Res1107122Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lau, WY, Leow, CK, Li, AK 1997History of endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery.World J Surg21444453Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lennard, TW, Shenton, BK, Borzotta, A, Donnelly, PK, White, M, Gerrie, LM, Proud, G, Taylor, RM 1985The influence of surgical operations on components of the human immune system.Br J Surg72771776Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Little, D, Regan, M, Keane, RM, Bouchier Hayes, D 1993Perioperative immune modulation.Surgery1148791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mathew, G, Watson, DI, Ellis, T, Jamieson, GG, Rofe, AM 1999The role of peritoneal immunity and the tumour-bearing state on the development of wound and peritoneal metastases after laparoscopy.Aust N Z J Surg691418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mathew, G, Watson, DI, Rofe, AM, Baigrie, CF, Ellis, T, Jamieson, GG 1996Wound metastases following laparoscopic and open surgery for abdominal cancer in a rat model.Br J Surg8310871009Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McDermott, JP, Regan, MC, Page, R, Stokes, MA, Barry, K, Moriarty, DC, Caushaj, PF, Fitzpatrick, JM, Gorey, TF 1995Cardiorespiratory effects of laparoscopy with and without gas insufflation.Arch Surg130984988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mouton, WG, Bessell, JR, Pfitzner, J, Dymock, RB, Brealey, J, Maddern, GJ 1999A randomized controlled trial to determine the effects of humidified carbon dioxide insufflation during thoracoscopy.Surg Endosc13382385Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Murthy, SM, Goldschmidt, RA, Rao, LN, Ammirati, M, Buchmann, T, Scanlon, EF 1999The influence of surgical trauma on experimental metastasis.Cancer6420352044Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nathan, CF 1987Secretory products of macrophages.J Clin Invest79319326Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nduka, CC, Coates, P, Poland, N, Kalu, P, Davies, R, Mansfield, AO, Darzi, A 1997Intraoperative modulation of the metastatic cascade by carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum.Br J Surg8416131614AbstractGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Neuberger, TJ, Andrus, CH, Wittgen, CM, Wade, TP, Kaminski, DL 1996Prospective comparison of helium versus carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum.Gastrointest Endosc433841PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Neuhaus, SJ, Gupta, A, Watson, DI 2001Helium and other alternative insufflation gases for laparoscopy: a review.Surg Endosc15553560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Neuhaus, SJ, Texler, M, Hewett, PJ, Watson, DI 1998Port-site metastases following laparoscopic surgery.Br J Surg85735741CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neuhaus, SJ, Watson, DI, Ellis, T, Lafullarde, T, Jamieson, GG, Russell, WJ 2001Metabolic and immunological consequences of laparoscopy with helium or carbon dioxide insufflation: a randomized clinical study.ANZ J Surg71447452Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Neuhaus, SJ, Watson, DI, Ellis, T, Rofe, AM, Jamieson, GG 2000The effect of immune enhancement and suppression on the development of laparoscopic port-site metastases.Surg Endosc14439443Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Neuhaus, SJ, Watson, DI, Ellis, T, Rofe, AM, Mathew, G, Jamieson, GG 2000The influence of different gases on intraperitoneal immunity in tumour-bearing rats.World J Surg2412271231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Neuhaus, SJ, Watson, DI, Ellis, T, Rowland, R, Rofe, AM, Pike, GK, Mathew, G, Jamieson, GG 1998Wound metastasis following laparoscopy with different insufflation gases.Surgery123579583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Puttick, MI, Nduka, CC, Yong, LY, Darzi, A 1998Exposure of peritoneal macrophages to carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum suppresses function and diminishes antitumour cell cytotoxicity.Br J Surg851579Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Puttick, MI, Scott-Coombes, DM, Dye, J, Nduka, CC, Menzies-Gow, NM, Mansfield, AO, Darzi, A 1999Comparison of immunologic and physiologic effects of CO2 pneumoperitoneum at room and body temperatures.Surg Endosc13572575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Redmond, HP, Hofmann, K, Shou, J, Leon, P, Kelly, CJ, Daly, JM 1992Effects of laparotomy on systemic macrophage function.Surgery111647655Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Redmond, HP, Watson, RW, Houghton, T, Condron, C, Watson, RG, Bouchier-Hayes, D 1994Immune function in patients undergoing open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Arch Surg12912401246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rofe, AM, Bourgeois, CS, Coyle, P 1992Beneficial effects of endotoxin treatment on metabolism in tumour-bearing rats.Immunol Cell Biol7017Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schaeff, B, Paolucci, V, Henze, A, Encke, A 1998Electron microscopical changes to pneumoperitoneum after laparoscopic operations.Surg Endosc12O36AbstractGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Schwenk, W, Jacobi, C, Mansmann, U, Bohm, B, Muller, JM 2000Inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections: results of a prospective randomized trial.Langenbecks Arch Surg38529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shuto, K, Kitano, S, Yoshida, T, Bandoh, T, Mitarai, Y, Kobayashi, M 1995Hemodynamic and arterial blood gas changes during carbon dioxide and helium pneumoperitoneum in pigs.Surg Endosc911731178Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Slater, NJ, Raftery, AT, Cope, GH 1989The ultrastructure of human abdominal mesothelium.J Anat1674756Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Trokel, MJ, Bessler, M, Treat, MR, Whelan, RL, Nowygrod, R 1994Preservation of immune response after laparoscopy.Surg Endosc813851387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Volz, J, Koster, S, Spacek, Z, Paweletz, N 1999Characteristic alterations of the peritoneum after carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum.Surg Endosc13611614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Volz, J, Koster, S, Weiss, M, Schmidt, R, Urbaschek, R, Melchert, F, Albrecht, M 1996Pathophysiologic features of a pneumoperitoneum at laparoscopy: a swine model.Am J Obstet Gynecol174132140Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Watson, RW, Redmond, HP, McCarthy, J, Burke, PE, Bouchier Hayes, D 1995Exposure of the peritoneal cavity to air regulates early inflammatory responses to surgery in a murine model.Br J Surg8210601065PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    West, MA, Baker, J, Bellingham, J 1996Kinetics of decreased LPS-stimulated cytokine release by macrophages exposed to CO2.J Surg Res63269274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    West, MA, Hackam, DJ, Baker, J, Rodriguez, JL, Bellingham, J, Rotstein, OD 1997Mechanism of decreased in vitro murine macrophage cytokine release after exposure to carbon dioxide: relevance to laparoscopic surgery.Ann Surg226179190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Flinders University Department of SurgeryFlinders Medical CentreBedford ParkAustralia

Personalised recommendations