Advertisement

Comparison of biomaterials in the early postoperative period

  • M. R. Langenbach
  • J. Schmidt
  • H. Zirngibl
Original article

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic hernia repair necessitates the use of biocompatible materials. A prospective, double-blind study was conducted to compare two different polypropylene meshes. Methods: The study included 40 men with primary inguinal hernia undergoing transabdominal preperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair. In 20 of these men, a monofile, heavy-weight, rigid mesh was implanted (group A), and in the remaining 20 men, a smooth, heavy-weight variant of polypropylene mesh was implanted (group B). Complications, pain development, inability to work, physical conditions, testicular volume, and blood circulation were documented. Results: Reconvalescence in group A was slower than in group B. In group A, the postoperative values of the visual scales for pain development were higher; inability to work was 7.3 days longer; urologic disorders were worse; activities of everyday life were more reduced; and SF-36 data showed a significant reduction of physical problems (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The polypropylene mesh variant seems to be more compatible with the human organism than conventional mesh. Not only the material, but also the structure seems to influence the comfort of the mesh.

Keywords

TAPP Biomaterials Polypropylene Mesh Inguinal hernia 

References

  1. 1.
    Abad-Torrent, A, Calabuig, R, Sueiras, A, Casasin, T, Ramon, C, Pelegri, D, Izquierdo, E, Faura, A, Linares, MJ 1996Efficacy of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric block in the treatment of the postoperative pain of inguinal herniorrhaphy.Rev Esp Anstesiol Reanim43318320Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anson, BJ, Morgan, EH, McVay, CB 1960Surgical anatomy of the inguinal region based upon a study of 500 bodyhalves.Surg Gynecol Obstet111707711Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avtan, L, Avci, C, Bulut, T, Fourtanier, G 1997Mesh infections after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.Surg Laparosc Endosc7192195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batorfi, J, Kelemen, O, Vizsy, L, Simon, E, Balint, A, Posfai, G 1997Transabdominal preperitoneal herniorraphy: technique and results.Acta Chir Hung361821PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bittner, R, Leibl, B, Kraft, K 1997Laparoscopic hernia repair: prevention and therapy of complications.Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd114935938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bittner, R, Leibl, B, Kraft, K, Daubler, P, Schwarz, J 1996Laparoscopic hernioplasty (TAPP): complications and recurrences in 900 operations.Zentralbl Chir121313319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bogojavlensky S (1989) Laparoscopic treatment of inguinal and femoral hernia. Videovorführung, 18. Annual Meeting of American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bude, RO, Kennelly, MJ, Adler, RS, Rubin, JM 1995Nonpulsatile arterial waveforms: observations during graded testicular torsion in rats.Acad Radiol2879882PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chandler, SB 1950Studies on the inguinal region.Anat Rec10793Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corbitt Jr, JD 1991Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.Surg Laparosc Endosc123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Felix, EL, Habertson, N, Vartanian, S 1999Laparoscopic hernioplasty: significant complications.Surg Endosc13328331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gillion, JF, Balique, JG, Begin, GF, Elhadad, A, Fourtanier, G 1996Celioscopic treatment of recurrence of inguinal hernia after insertion of a prosthesis: value of the intraperitoneal technique with ePTFE patch? Group (Cure des hernies Inguino-crurales sous Coelioscopie).Ann Chir50821826PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jarhult, J, Hakanson, C, Akerud, L 1999Laparoscopic treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias: experience from 281 operations.Surg Laparosc Endosc9115118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klinge, U, Conze, J, Limberg, W 1996Pathophysiologie der Bauchdecken.Chirurg67229233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klinge, U, Klosterhalfen, B, Conze, J, Limberg, W 1998Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall.Eur J Surg164951954PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klosterhalfen, B, Klinge, U, Hermanns, B, Schumpelick, V 2000Pathology of traditional surgical nets for hernia repair after long-term implantation in humans.Chirurg714351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klosterhalfen, B, Klinge, U, Schumpelick, V 1998Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair.Biomaterials1922352246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Phillips, EH, Arregui, M, Carroll, BJ, Corbitt, J, Crafton, WB, Fallas, MJ, Filipi, C, Fitzgibbons, RJ, Fanklin, MJ, McKernan, B 1995Incidence of complications following laparoscopic hernioplasty.Surg Endosc91621Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schafmayer, A, Neufang, T, Barthel, M, Schleef, J, Lüdtke, FE, Lepsien, G 1992Endoskopischer Hernienverschluß.Chirurg63357358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schumpelick, V, Arlt, G, Schlachetzki, A, Klosterhalfen, B 1997Chronic inguinal pain after transperitoneal mesh implantation: case report of net shrinkage.Chirurg6812971300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schumpelick, V, Schippers, E, Kupczk-Joeris, D 1993Fehler und Gefahren in der Hernienchirurgie.Chirug64237241Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Siewert, JR 1990Wandel der Eingriffshäufigkeiten in der Allgemeinchirurgie.Chirurg61855858PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Suzer, O, Ozcan, H, Kupeli, S, Gheiler, EL 1997Color Doppler imaging in the diagnosis of the acute scrotum.Eur Urol32457461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wantz, GE 1996Experience with the tension-free hernioplasty for primary inguinal hernias in men.J Am Coll Surg183351356PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Witten-Herdecke, Helios Klinikum, Heusner-Strasse 40, D-42283 WuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations