Toward totally endoscopic coronary artery surgery

  • R. H. J. Trimlett
  • A. C. De Souza
  • A. S. Coonar
  • K. M. Jurgens
  • R. Kuenzler
  • J. R. Pepper
Original article

Abstract

Background: Here we explore a method of using robotics to reduce morbidity and mortality in conventional coronary surgery. Methods: Using a robotic surgical system two surgeons completed five steps: (1) 80 synthetic suture exercises; (2) 76 left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending (LIMA-to-LAD) on porcine hearts; (3) cadaveric port placement for assessing optimal access; (4) endoscopic stabilization in the live porcine model; and, finally (5) eight clinical LIMA-to-LADs performed robotically. Results: After 70 hours training, mean dry lab times fell from 7.0 and 5.8 min to 5.7 and 5.1 min in the two surgeonstab series. Wet lab times fell from 40.1 and 28.5 min to 28.8 and 19.2 min. In the clinical series of eight patients there were no mortalities; all had uncomplicated postoperative recovery and all were angina free at 6-week follow-up. Conclusion: The learning curve for robotic training is short, and reproducible results can be achieved clinically, after appropriate training, resulting in real patient benefit.

Keywords

Cardiothoracic surgery Training Endoscopy Robotics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding provided by Special Trustees of the Royal Brompton Hospital Charitable Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    British Cardiovascular Intervention Society, Interventional Returns for the Year 2002, http://www.bcis.org.uk/
  2. 2.
    Falk V, Klima U, Wimmer-Greinecker G (2002) Ventrica Magnetic Vascular Positioner (MVP). 38th Annual Meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, TechCon 2002, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Favorolo, RG 1998Critical analysis of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a 30-year journey.J AM Coll Cardiol311B63BCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jansen, EWL, Borst, C, Lahpor, JR,  et al. 1998Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass using the Octopus method: results in the first 100 patients.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1166067PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiviluoto, T, Siren, J, Luukkonen, P, Kivilaakso, E 1998Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis.Lancet351321325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koh, TW, Carr-White, GS, DeSouza, AC,  et al. 1999Effect of coronary occlusion on left ventricular function with and without collateral supply during beating heart surgery.Heart81285291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leon MB, et al. (2002) Sirius Study. 14th Annual Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics. Lenox Hill Hospital and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rivetti, LA, Gandra, SMA 1997Initial experience using an intraluminal shunt during revascularisation of the beating heart.Ann Thorac Surg6317421747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shennib, H, Lee, AGL, Akin, J 1997Safe and effective method of stabilisation for coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart.Ann Thorac Surg63988992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, United Kingdom Cardiac Surgical Register, http://www.scts.org
  11. 11.
    Wantanabe, G, Takahashi, M, Misaki, T,  et al. 1999Beating heart endoscopic coronary artery surgery.Lancet25421312132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. H. J. Trimlett
    • 1
  • A. C. De Souza
    • 1
  • A. S. Coonar
    • 1
  • K. M. Jurgens
    • 1
  • R. Kuenzler
    • 1
  • J. R. Pepper
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryRoyal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, LondonUK

Personalised recommendations