Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (Endo Assist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- 340 Downloads
The role of the human camera holder during laparoscopic surgery keeps valuable personnel from other duties. EndoAssist is a robotic cameraholding device controlled by the operator’s head movements. This study assesses its introduction into clinical practice.
Ninety-three patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to have either the robotic (40) or a human (46) assistant. Seven patients converted to open operation were excluded. Six surgeons were evaluated. Operating time and subjective assessments were recorded. Learning curves were constructed.
The mean operating time was less using the robotic assistant (66 min) than with human assistance (74. min) (p<0.05, two-tailed t-test). The learning curves for operating time showed that within three operations surgeons were trained in using the robot. The device was safe in use.
The EndoAssist operating device is a significant asset in laparoscopic surgery and a suitable substitute for a human assistant. Surgeons became competent in the use of the robot within three operations. The robot offers stability and good control of the television image in laparoscopic surgery.
Key wordsMedical robotics Laparoscopic surgery
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Baca I, Goetzen V (1998) Robotic assistance in “solo surgery” and complex laparoscopic procedures (abstract) Surg Endosc 12: 500Google Scholar
- 4.Finlay PA (1996) Clinical experience with a goniometric headcontrolled laparoscope manipulator. Proceedings of the IARP Workshop on Medical Robotics, Vienna, Oct 1996Google Scholar
- 6.Geis WP (1996) Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilisation in complex minimally invasive procedures. Proceedings of 4th International Symposium, Medicine Meets Virtual Reality: 4, Healthcare in the Information Age: Future Tools for Transforming Medicine. San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
- 7.Gracia C (1996) Clinical utility of a robotic assistant during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Conference for Minimally Invasive Therapy, Milan, Italy, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
- 15.Uggen PE, Marvik R, Myrvold HE, Finlay PA (1996) Assessment of EndoSista, a head controlled camera manipulator. Proceedings of E. A. E. S. Trondheim, Norway, JuneGoogle Scholar
- 16.Warden J (1996) UK waiting lists grow longer. Br Med J 316: 1627Google Scholar
- 17.Zweifler MJ, Leitman IM, Subramaniam VA, Turgeon R, Mitchell D (1998) Does the use of the surgical robot allow for the replacement of an assistant during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? (abstract) Surg Endosc 12: 510Google Scholar