Advertisement

Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • T. Bisgaard
  • B. Klarskov
  • R. Trap
  • H. Kehlet
  • J. Rosenberg
Article

Abstract

Background: Downsizing the port incisions may reduce pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: In a double-blind controlled study, 60 patients were randomized to undergo either microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy using one 10-mm and three 3.5-mm trocars (3.5-mm LC) or traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy using two 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars (LC). Incisional pain at each port incision and overall pain were recorded for 1 week after the operation. Fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pulmonary function, and cosmetic results were also measured. Results: Data from 52 patients were analyzed; eight patients were excluded from the study for various reasons. One patient was converted from 3.5-mm LC to LC due to technical problems with the 3.5-mm optic. In the 3.5-mm LC group (n = 25), incisional pain was significantly decreased in the 1st postoperative week as compared with the LC group (n = 27) (p <0.01). In both groups, pain scores at the supraumbilical 10-mm port were significantly higher compared with other port sites (p <0.05). The cosmetic results were significantly better in the 3.5-mm LC group (p <0.01). There were no significant differences in any of the other variables. Conclusion: The use of 3.5-mm trocars is feasible in LC, and it both reduces incisional pain and improves the cosmetic result.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Bisgaard
    • 1
  • B. Klarskov
    • 1
  • R. Trap
    • 1
  • H. Kehlet
    • 1
  • J. Rosenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical Gastroenterology 435, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, DenmarkDenmark

Personalised recommendations