Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Kannada Version of EAT 10

Abstract

Background

Eating Assessment Tool 10 is a symptom survey and has several advantages over other existing questionnaires. The instrument has also proven to be useful in establishing initial dysphagia symptom severity and to aid in measuring treatment outcomes. Due to its wide applicability, the instrument has been translated into several languages. The aim of the present study was to translate and validate the Kannada version of Eating Assessment Tool 10.

Method

88 individuals with dysphagia and equal number of healthy individuals filled the Kannada version of Eating Assessment Tool. Internal consistency and test–retest reproducibility were used for reliability testing. Validity was also established by comparing the scores of dysphagia patients and healthy controls.

Results

The overall Cronbach’s α for the tool was 0.9 indicating a good internal consistency. The internal consistency of each of the items was also high, and ranged 0.88 to 0.9. Twenty patients filled the questionnaire after a span of 48 h, and the ICC coefficient was found to be 0.89 indicating a high reliability. The control group has significantly lower scores for all scales when compared to the dysphagia group [t(174) = 78.41, p < 0.001].

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates that the Kannada version of EAT 10 has good internal consistency, test retest reliability, and concurrent validity. The results of the study also reveal that it is a reliable and valid tool for screening dysphagia population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Campbell BH, Spinelli K, Marbella AM, Myers KB, Kuhn JC, Layde PM. Aspiration, weight loss, and quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(9):1100–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.130.9.1100.

  2. 2.

    Nguyen NP, Frank C, Moltz CC, Vos P, Smith HJ, Karlsson U, et al. Impact of dysphagia on quality of life after treatment of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61(3):772–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.017.

  3. 3.

    Rofes L, Arreola V, Mukherjee R, Clavé P. Sensitivity and specificity of the Eating assessment tool and the volume-viscosity swallow test for clinical evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26(9):1256–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12382.

  4. 4.

    Timmerman AA, Speyer R, Heijnen BJ, Klijn-Zwijnenberg IR. Psychometric characteristics of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2014;29(2):183–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9511-8.

  5. 5.

    Altman KW, Yu GP, Schaefer SD. Consequence of dysphagia in the hospitalized patient: impact on prognosis and hospital resources. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(8):784–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2010.129.

  6. 6.

    Patel DA, Krishnaswami S, Steger E, Conover E, Vaezi MF, Ciucci MR, Francis DO. Economic and survival burden of dysphagia among inpatients in the United States. Dis Esophagus. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/dox131.

  7. 7.

    Cordier R, Speyer R, Chen Y-W, Wilkes-Gillan S, Brown T, Bourke-Taylor H, et al. Evaluating the psychometric quality of social skills measures: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0132299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132299.

  8. 8.

    Dwivedi RC, Rose SS, Roe JWG, Khan AS, Pepper C, Nutting CM, et al. Validation of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) in a cohort of head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(4):e10–e1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.02.004.

  9. 9.

    Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117(12):919–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940811701210.

  10. 10.

    Plowman EK, Tabor LC, Robison R, Gaziano J, Dion C, Watts SA, et al. Discriminant ability of the eating assessment tool-10 to detect aspiration in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;28(1):85–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12700.

  11. 11.

    Cheney DM, Siddiqui MT, Litts JK, Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. The ability of the 10-Item eating assessment tool (EAT-10) to predict aspiration risk in persons with dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014;124(5):351–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489414558107.

  12. 12.

    Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Monzani A, Ceriani E, Atac M, Jukic-Peladic N, et al. Reliability and validity of the italian eating assessment tool. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;122(11):717–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941312201109.

  13. 13.

    Burgos R, Sarto B, Segurola H, Romagosa A, Puiggros C, Vazquez C, et al. Translation and validation of the spanish version of the eating assessment tool-10 (eat-10) for the screening of dysphagia. Clin Nutr Suppl. 2011;6(1):167. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1744-1161(11)70431-8.

  14. 14.

    Nogueira DS, Ferreira PL, Reis EA, Lopes IS. Measuring outcomes for dysphagia: validity and reliability of the european portuguese eating assessment tool (P-EAT-10). Dysphagia. 2015;30(5):511–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9630-5.

  15. 15.

    Demir N, Serel Arslan S, İnal Ö, Karaduman AA. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Eating Assessment Tool (T-EAT-10). Dysphagia. 2016;31(5):644–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9723-9.

  16. 16.

    Wild D, Eremenco S, Mear I, Martin M, Houchin C, Gawlicki M, et al. Multinational trials—recommendations on the translations required, approaches to using the same language in different countries, and the approaches to support pooling the data: the ISPOR patient-reported outcomes translation and linguistic validation good research practices task force report. Value Health. 2009;12(4):430–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00471.x.

  17. 17.

    Rahul K, Swapna N, Resmitha R, Jyotsna K. Comparison between automatic and volitional swallow in healthy individuals using tongue array and cervical auscultation modules. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(4):520–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01699-7.

  18. 18.

    Kumar RB, Bhat JS. Manipal manual for swallowing assessment. Manipal: Manipal University Press; 2012.

  19. 19.

    Balasubramanium RK, Bhat JS. Efficacy of manipal manual of swallowing assessment in identifying aspiration. Int J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 2015;3(2):82–92.

  20. 20.

    Fink TA, Ross JB. Are we testing a true thin liquid? Dysphagia. 2009;24(3):285–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9203-y.

  21. 21.

    Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11(2):93–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00417897.

  22. 22.

    Wilmskoetter J, Bonilha H, Hong I, Hazelwood RJ, Martin-Harris B, Velozo C. Construct validity of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Disabil Rehabil. 2017;41(5):549–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1398787.

  23. 23.

    Cordier R, Joosten A, Clavé P, Schindler A, Bülow M, Demir N, et al. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10) using rasch analysis. Dysphagia. 2016;32(2):250–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9754-2.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the team members involved in the translation of EAT-10 tool

Author information

Correspondence to Radish Kumar Balasubramanium.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 23 kb). The Kannada version of EAT 10.

Appendix

Appendix

Additional information on psychometric properties of MMSA could be found here: https://sg.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/9619

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishnamurthy, R., Balasubramanium, R.K. & Hegde, P.S. Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Kannada Version of EAT 10. Dysphagia (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10094-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Deglutition
  • Deglutition disorders
  • Dysphagia
  • Patient report outcome measure
  • Screening