Advertisement

Dysphagia

pp 1–8 | Cite as

Dysphagia Prevalence, Attitudes, and Related Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

  • Athanasia PrintzaEmail author
  • Stefanos Triaridis
  • Maria Kalaitzi
  • Ioannis Nikolaidis
  • Christos Bakirtzis
  • Jannis Constantinidis
  • Nikolaos Grigoriadis
Original Article

Abstract

Dysphagia in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is associated with significant morbidity and has profound impact on the quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to analyze the dysphagia prevalence, attitudes, and dysphagia-related QoL in patients with MS, not at relapse. A prospective study of 108 consecutively recruited patients. The patients were asked to report dysphagia and completed a general dysphagia questionnaire (the Eating Assessment Tool-10, EAT-10), a disease-specific dysphagia questionnaire (the Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis, DYMUS), and a dysphagia-related QoL questionnaire (the Swallowing-Quality of Life). Twenty-six percent of the patients reported dysphagia. Many more were classified as dysphagic by the questionnaires (34.3% by EAT-10 and 44.4% by DYMUS). Overall, one out of four patients reported difficulties or choking while drinking fluids and eating food, cough related to eating, food sticking in the throat, need for food and drink segmentation, and repetitive swallows. The pleasure of eating was found to be moderately affected. The patients seem to cope well with the psychological and social impact of dysphagia. Serious consideration must be given to patients’ perceptions and attitudes towards dysphagia. Our patients reported very little fear associated with their swallowing difficulties and choking. Apparently, they do not perceive the severity of their symptoms as an actual danger, as they have developed coping strategies. Dysphagia is common in MS patients not at relapse, even with mild disease-related impairment. Swallowing should be systematically assessed with validated questionnaires in all patients with MS at the course of the disease.

Keywords

Dysphagia Multiple sclerosis Deglutition Deglutition disorders Quality of life Attitudes 

Notes

Funding

This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors Athanasia Printza, MD, MSc, PhD; Stefanos Triaridis, MD, MSc, PhD; Maria Kalaitzi, MSc; Ioannis Nikolaidis, MD, PhD; Christos Bakirtzis, MD, PhD; Jannis Constantinidis, MD, PhD; and Nikolaos Grigoriadis, MD, PhD declare that there is no conflict of interest related to this paper.

Ethical Approval

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments and had Institutional review Board approval.

References

  1. 1.
    Calcagno P, Ruoppolo G, Grasso MG, De Vincentiis M, Paolucci S. Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis—prevalence and prognostic factors. Acta Neurol Scand. 2002;105:40–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guan X, Wang H, Huang H, Meng L. Prevalence of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2015;36(5):671–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Printza A, Kalaitzi M, Bakirtzis C, Nikolaidis I, Proios H, Grigoriadis N. Reliability and validity of the DYMUS Questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis (Greek version) and proposed modification. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;23:62–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2018.05.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fernandes A, Duprat AC, Eckley C, Silva L, Ferreira R, Tilbery C. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with multiple sclerosis: do the disease classification scales reflect dysphagia severity? Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(4):460–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Solaro C, Rezzani C, Trabucco E, Amato M, Zipoli V, Portaccio E, Giannini M, Patti F, D'Amico E, Frau J, Lorefice L, Bonavita S, Della, Corte M, Grasso M, Finamore L, Ghezzi A, Annovazzi P, Rottoli M, Gasperini C, Restivo D, Maimone D, Rossi P, Stromillo M, Bergamaschi R (2013) Prevalence of patient-reported dysphagia in multiple sclerosis patients: an Italian multicenter study (using the DYMUS questionnaire). J Neurol Sci 15 331(1–2):94–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, Wuttge-Hannig A, Ortega P. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Belafsky P, Mouadeb D, Rees C, Pryor J, Postma G, Allen J, Leonard R. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117:919–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Macqueen C, Taubert S, Cotter D, Stevens S, Frost G. Which commercial thickening agent do patients prefer? Dysphagia. 2003;18:46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Printza Α, Kyrgidis Α, Pavlidou E, Triaridis S, Constantinidis J. Reliability and validity of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Greek adaptation) in neurogenic and head and neck cancer related oropharyngeal dysphagia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(7):1861–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5001-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bergamaschi R, Rezzani C, Minguzzi S, Amato M, Patti F, et al. DMS Group Validation of the DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Funct Neurol. 2009;24(3):159–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, et al. The SWALQOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17:97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Georgopoulos V, Perdikogianni M, Mouskenteri M, Psychogiou L, Oikonomou M, Malandraki G. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the SWAL-QoL questionnaire in Greek. Dysphagia. 2018;33(1):91–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9837-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Monzani A, Ceriani E, Atac M, Jukic-Peladic N, et al. Reliability and validity of the Italian eating assessment tool. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011;122:717–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alali D, Ballard K, Vucic S, Bogaardt H. Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis: evaluation and validation of the DYMUS questionnaire. Dysphagia. 2018;33(3):273–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9864-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kurtzke J. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33:1444–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenbek J, Robbins J, Roecker E, Coyle J, Wood J. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neubauer P, Rademaker A, Leder S. The Yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale: an anatomically defined and image based tool. Dysphagia. 2015;30:521–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alfonsi E, Bergamaschi R, Cosentino G, Ponzio M, Montomoli C, Restivo D, Brighina F, Ravaglia S, Prunetti P, Bertino G, Benazzo M, Fontana D, Moglia A. Electrophysiological patterns of oropharyngeal swallowing in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(8):1638–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.03.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tenekeci E, Kara B, Cetiz A, Demirkaya S, Demir N, Acikel C. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Noro Psikiyatr ARS. 2016;55(3):243–7.  https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2016.18105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sales D, Alvarenga R, Vasconcelos C, Silva R, Thuler L. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. SpringerPlus. 2013;2:332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alali D, Ballard K, Bogaardt H. The frequency of dysphagia and its impact on adults with multiple sclerosis based on patient-reported questionnaires. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;25:227–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2018.08.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rommer P, Eichstädt K, Ellenberger D, Flachenecker P, Friede T, Haas J, Kleinschnitz C, Pöhlau D, Rienhoff O, Stahmann A, Zettl U. Symptomatology and symptomatic treatment in multiple sclerosis: results from a nationwide MS registry. Mult Scler. 2018;19:1352458518799580.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518799580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cordier R, Joosten A, Clavé P, Schindler A, Bülow M, Demir N, Arslan SS, Speyer R. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10) using Rasch analysis. Dysphagia. 2017;32(2):250–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9754-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bartlett RS, Moore JE, Thibeault SL. Temporal analysis of factors associated with EAT-10 in outpatients with oropharyngeal dysphagia from a tertiary care clinic. Dysphagia. 2018;33(4):457–67.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9874-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.1st Otolaryngology Department, Medical Department, School of Health SciencesAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.2nd Neurology Department, Medical Department, School of Health SciencesAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations