Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the SWAL-QoL Questionnaire in Greek
- 277 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to translate and adapt the 44-item SWAL-QoL into Greek and examine its internal consistency, test–retest reliability, external construct validity, and discriminant validity in order to provide a validated dysphagia-specific QoL instrument in the Greek language. The instrument was translated into Greek using the back translation to ensure linguistic validity and was culturally adapted resulting in the SWAL-QoL-GR. Two groups of participants were included: a patient group of 86 adults (48 males; age range: 18–87 years) diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia, and an age-matched healthy control group (39 adults; 19 males; age range: 18–84 years). The Greek 30-item version of the WHOQOL-BREF was used for assessment of construct validity. Overall, the questionnaire achieved good to excellent psychometric values. Internal consistency of all 10 subscales and the physical symptoms scale of the SWAL-QoL-GR assessed by Cronbach’s α was good to excellent (0.811 < α < 0.940). Test–retest validity was found to be good to excellent as well. In addition, moderate to strong correlations were found between seven of the ten subscales of the SWAL-QoL-GR with limited items of the WHOQΟL-BREF (0.401 < ρ < 0.65), supporting good construct validity of the SWAL-QoL-GR. The SWAL-QoL-GR also correctly differentiated between patients with dysphagia and age-matched healthy controls (p < 0.001) on all 11 scales, further indicating excellent discriminant validity. Finally, no significant differences were found between the two sexes. This cultural adaptation and validation allows the use of this tool in Greece, further enhancing our clinical and scientific efforts to increase the evidence-based practice resources for dysphagia rehabilitation in Greece.
KeywordsSWAL-QoL WHOQOL-BREF Deglutition Deglutition disorders Quality of life
The authors thank the contributors to the translation and back translation of the questionnaire and all the study participants and the clinicians and centers/hospitals who referred patients. We also thank the original developers of the SWAL-QoL, especially Dr. McHorney, for the permission to translate and adapt the original SWAL-QoL into our language. Finally, we acknowledge the authors of the Greek version of the WHOQOL-BREF, especially Dr. Ginieri-Coccossis, for permission of its use in this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
- 9.Chin R, Lee BY. Economics and patient reported outcomes. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. p. 145–66.Google Scholar
- 25.Montoni NP, Horta IA, Bandeira AKC, Angelis EC. Cross-cultural adaptation of the SWAL-QOL and Swal-Care Questionnaires into Brazilian Portuguese. Appl Cancer Res. 2009;29:129–34.Google Scholar
- 27.Antunes EB, Vieira D, Dinis-ribeiro M. Linguistic and cultural adaptation into European Portuguese of SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Arq Med. 2015;29:6–10.Google Scholar
- 32.CPLOL—Prevention Commission (2005) Dysphagia Review 2004–2005. http://www.cplol.eu/images/Documents/prof_pract/CPLOL_dysphagiareport_en.pdf.
- 36.Rosenbek JC, Jones HN. Dysphagia in movement disorders. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2008.Google Scholar
- 38.Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Heal. 2005;8:94–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:299–310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Ginieri-Coccossis M, Triantafillou E, Tomaras V, et al. Psychometric properties of WHOQOL-BREF in clinical and health Greek populations: incorporating new culture-relevant items. Psychiatrike. 2011;23:130–42.Google Scholar
- 42.IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0.Google Scholar
- 43.Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.Google Scholar
- 45.George D, Mallery M. Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.Google Scholar