Advertisement

Dysphagia

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 91–99 | Cite as

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the SWAL-QoL Questionnaire in Greek

  • Voula C. Georgopoulos
  • Myrto Perdikogianni
  • Myrto Mouskenteri
  • Loukia Psychogiou
  • Maria Oikonomou
  • Georgia A. MalandrakiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to translate and adapt the 44-item SWAL-QoL into Greek and examine its internal consistency, test–retest reliability, external construct validity, and discriminant validity in order to provide a validated dysphagia-specific QoL instrument in the Greek language. The instrument was translated into Greek using the back translation to ensure linguistic validity and was culturally adapted resulting in the SWAL-QoL-GR. Two groups of participants were included: a patient group of 86 adults (48 males; age range: 18–87 years) diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia, and an age-matched healthy control group (39 adults; 19 males; age range: 18–84 years). The Greek 30-item version of the WHOQOL-BREF was used for assessment of construct validity. Overall, the questionnaire achieved good to excellent psychometric values. Internal consistency of all 10 subscales and the physical symptoms scale of the SWAL-QoL-GR assessed by Cronbach’s α was good to excellent (0.811 < α < 0.940). Test–retest validity was found to be good to excellent as well. In addition, moderate to strong correlations were found between seven of the ten subscales of the SWAL-QoL-GR with limited items of the WHOQΟL-BREF (0.401 < ρ < 0.65), supporting good construct validity of the SWAL-QoL-GR. The SWAL-QoL-GR also correctly differentiated between patients with dysphagia and age-matched healthy controls (p < 0.001) on all 11 scales, further indicating excellent discriminant validity. Finally, no significant differences were found between the two sexes. This cultural adaptation and validation allows the use of this tool in Greece, further enhancing our clinical and scientific efforts to increase the evidence-based practice resources for dysphagia rehabilitation in Greece.

Keywords

SWAL-QoL WHOQOL-BREF Deglutition Deglutition disorders Quality of life 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the contributors to the translation and back translation of the questionnaire and all the study participants and the clinicians and centers/hospitals who referred patients. We also thank the original developers of the SWAL-QoL, especially Dr. McHorney, for the permission to translate and adapt the original SWAL-QoL into our language. Finally, we acknowledge the authors of the Greek version of the WHOQOL-BREF, especially Dr. Ginieri-Coccossis, for permission of its use in this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Chow L, Siu E, Kong H, et al. The prevalence of depressive symptoms among elderly Chinese private nursing home residents in Hong Kong. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr. 2004;19:734–40. doi: 10.1002/gps.1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, et al. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002;17:139–46. doi: 10.1007/s00455-001-0113-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eslick GD, Talley NJ. Dysphagia: epidemiology, risk factors and impact on quality of life—a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:971–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03664.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farri A, Accornero A, Burdese C. Social importance of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and therapy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007;27:83–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gillespie MB, Brodsky MB, Day TA, et al. Swallowing-related quality of life after head and neck cancer treatment. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:1362–7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200408000-00008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nguyen NP, Frank C, Moltz CC, et al. Impact of dysphagia on quality of life after treatment of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:772–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Plowman-Prine EK, Sapienza CM, Okun MS, et al. The relationship between quality of life and swallowing in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2009;24:1352–8. doi: 10.1002/mds.22617.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deshpande PR, Rajan S, Sudeepthi BL, Abdul Nazir CP. Patient-reported outcomes: a new era in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2:137–44. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.86879.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chin R, Lee BY. Economics and patient reported outcomes. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. p. 145–66.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Kramer AE, et al. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: I. Conceptual foundation and item development. Dysphagia. 2000;15:115–21. doi: 10.1007/s004550010012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McHorney CCA, Bricker DE, Robbins JJ, et al. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagiain adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling. Dysphagia. 2000;15:122–33. doi: 10.1007/s004550010013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, et al. The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17:97–114. doi: 10.1007/s00455-001-0109-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Costa Bandeira AK, Azevedo EHM, Vartanian JG, et al. Quality of life related to swallowing after tongue cancer treatment. Dysphagia. 2008;23:183–92. doi: 10.1007/s00455-007-9124-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greenblatt DY, Sippel R, Leverson G, et al. Thyroid resection improves perception of swallowing function in patients with thyroid disease. World J Surg. 2009;33:255–60. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9837-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pyn Leow L, Huckabee ML, Anderson T, Beckert L. The impact of dysphagia on quality of life in ageing and Parkinson’s disease as measured by the swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QoL) questionnaire. Dysphagia. 2010;25:216–20. doi: 10.1007/s00455-009-9245-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paris G, Martinaud O, Petit A, et al. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis alters quality of life. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:199–204. doi: 10.1111/joor.12019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rinkel RN, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Langendijk JA, et al. The psychometric and clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL questionnaire in evaluating swallowing problems experienced by patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol; 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robbins J, Kays SA, Gangnon RE, et al. The effects of lingual exercise in stroke patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:150–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.11.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Troche MS, Okun MS, Rosenbek JC, et al. Aspiration and swallowing in Parkinson disease and rehabilitation with EMST: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2010;75:1912–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fef115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Webster KT, Samlan RA, Jones B, et al. Supracricoid partial laryngectomy: swallowing, voice, and speech outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010;119:10–6. doi: 10.1177/000348941011900102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Finizia C, Rudberg I, Bergqvist H, Rydén A. A cross-sectional validation study of the swedish version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2012;27:325–35. doi: 10.1007/s00455-011-9369-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khaldoun E, Woisard V, Verin É. Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009;33:167–71. doi: 10.1016/j.gcb.2008.12.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bogaardt H, Speyer R, Baijens L, Fokkens W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the dutch version of SWAL-QoL. Dysphagia. 2009;24:66–70. doi: 10.1007/s00455-008-9174-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lam PM, Lai CKY. The validation of the Chinese version of the swallow quality-of-life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Dysphagia. 2011;26:117–24. doi: 10.1007/s00455-010-9272-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Montoni NP, Horta IA, Bandeira AKC, Angelis EC. Cross-cultural adaptation of the SWAL-QOL and Swal-Care Questionnaires into Brazilian Portuguese. Appl Cancer Res. 2009;29:129–34.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim S, Cha Y. Reliability and validity of Korean version of the SWAL-QOL. J Korea Acad. 2014;15:2981–8. doi: 10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.5.2981.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Antunes EB, Vieira D, Dinis-ribeiro M. Linguistic and cultural adaptation into European Portuguese of SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Arq Med. 2015;29:6–10.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ginocchio D, Alfonsi E, Mozzanica F, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2016;31:626–34. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9720-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Demir N, Serel Arslan S, İnal Ö, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the swallow quality of life questionnaire. Türk Fiz ve Rehabil Derg. 2016;27:19–29. doi: 10.21653/tfrd.271061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Okalidou A, Kampanaros M. Teacher perceptions of communication impairment at screening stage in preschool children living in Patras, Greece. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2001;36:489–502. doi: 10.1080/13682820110089399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Malandraki G, Markaki V, Georgopoulos VC, et al. An international pilot study of asynchronous teleconsultation for oropharyngeal dysphagia. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:75–9. doi: 10.1177/1357633X12474963.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    CPLOL—Prevention Commission (2005) Dysphagia Review 2004–2005. http://www.cplol.eu/images/Documents/prof_pract/CPLOL_dysphagiareport_en.pdf.
  33. 33.
    Malandraki G, Markaki V, Georgopoulos V. Postextubation dysphagia in critical patients: a first report from the largest step-down intensive care unit in Greece. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2016;25:150–6. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fountoulakis KN, Tsolaki M, Chantzi H, Kazis A. Mini mental state examination (MMSE): a validation study in Greece. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2000;15:342–5. doi: 10.1177/153331750001500604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McHorney CA, Martin-Harris B, Robbins J, Rosenbek J. Clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcome tools with respect to bolus flow measures. Dysphagia. 2006;21:141–8. doi: 10.1007/s00455-005-0026-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rosenbek JC, Jones HN. Dysphagia in movement disorders. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2008.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sartorius N, Kuyken W. Translation of health status instruments. Berlin: Springer; 1994. p. 3–18. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_1.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Heal. 2005;8:94–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    The Whoqol Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:1569–85. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:299–310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ginieri-Coccossis M, Triantafillou E, Tomaras V, et al. Psychometric properties of WHOQOL-BREF in clinical and health Greek populations: incorporating new culture-relevant items. Psychiatrike. 2011;23:130–42.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1874.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    George D, Mallery M. Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hahn EA, Cella D, Chassany O, et al. Precision of health-related quality-of-life data compared with other clinical measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:1244–54. doi: 10.4065/82.10.1244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52:281–302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Voula C. Georgopoulos
    • 1
  • Myrto Perdikogianni
    • 1
  • Myrto Mouskenteri
    • 1
  • Loukia Psychogiou
    • 1
  • Maria Oikonomou
    • 1
  • Georgia A. Malandraki
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Speech & Language Therapy, INTERACT LabTEI of Western GreecePatrasGreece
  2. 2.Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations