A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Tongue-Pressure Resistance Training Protocols for Post-Stroke Dysphagia
- 1.6k Downloads
The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of two tongue resistance training protocols. One protocol (“tongue-pressure profile training”) emphasized the pressure-timing patterns that are typically seen in healthy swallows by focusing on gradual pressure release and saliva swallowing tasks. The second protocol (“tongue-pressure strength and accuracy training”) emphasized strength and accuracy in tongue-palate pressure generation and did not include swallowing tasks. A prospective, randomized, parallel allocation trial was conducted. Of 26 participants who were screened for eligibility, 14 received up to 24 sessions of treatment. Outcome measures of posterior tongue strength, oral bolus control, penetration–aspiration and vallecular residue were made based on videofluoroscopy analysis by blinded raters. Complete data were available for 11 participants. Significant improvements were seen in tongue strength and post-swallow vallecular residue with thin liquids, regardless of treatment condition. Stage transition duration (a measure of the duration of the bolus presence in the pharynx prior to swallow initiation, which had been chosen to capture impairments in oral bolus control) showed no significant differences. Similarly, significant improvements were not seen in median scores on the penetration–aspiration scale. This trial suggests that tongue strength can be improved with resistance training for individuals with tongue weakness following stroke. We conclude that improved penetration–aspiration does not necessarily accompany improvements in tongue strength; however, tongue-pressure resistance training does appear to be effective for reducing thin liquid vallecular residue.
KeywordsDeglutition Deglutition disorders Dysphagia Rehabilitation Tongue
This study was funded by a grant-in-aid from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Carly Barbon, Vivian Chak, Amy Dhindsa, Robbyn Draimin, Sonya Torreiter, and Teresa Valenzano with videofluoroscopy rating and analysis.
This trial was funded through Grant-in-Aid NA 7337 from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
- 4.Robbins J, Gensler G, Hind J, Logemann JA, Lindblad AS, Brandt D, Baum H, Lilienfeld D, Kosek S, Lundy D, Dikeman K, Kazandian M, Gramigna GD, McGarvey-Toler S, Miller Gardner PJ. Comparison of 2 interventions for liquid aspiration on pneumonia incidence: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:509–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.Robbins J, Nicosia MA, Hind JA, Gill GD, Blanco R, Logemann JA. Defining physical properties of fluids for dysphagia evaluation and treatment. Perspectives on swallowing and swallowing disorders (Dysphagia). American Speech-Language Hearing Association Special Interest Division 13 Newsletter 2002, pp 16–19.Google Scholar
- 6.Steele CM, Alsanei WA, Ayanikalath S, Barbon CE, Chen J, Cichero JA, Coutts K, Dantas RO, Duivestein J, Giosa L, Hanson B, Lam P, Lecko C, Leigh C, Nagy A, Namasivayam AM, Nascimento WV, Odendaal I, Smith CH, Wang H. The influence of food texture and liquid consistency modification on swallowing physiology and function: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2015;30:2–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Butler SG, Stuart A, Leng X, Rees C, Williamson J, Kritchevsky SB. The association between aspiration status and tongue and handgrip strength in healthy older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:S132.Google Scholar
- 19.Steele CM. Optimal approaches to measuring tongue-pressure functional reserve. J Aging Res. 2013. Article ID 542909. doi: 10.1155/2013/542909
- 41.Kotrlik JW, Williams HA. The incorporation of effect size in informaton technology, learning, and performance research. Inf Technol Learn Perform J. 2003;21:1–7.Google Scholar