The implication of dysphagia for people treated nonsurgically for head and neck cancer (HNC) and its detrimental effects on functioning and quality of life has been well documented. To date, however, there has been a paucity of research on the effects of dysphagia following HNC on carers, independent of the consequences of a gastrostomy. The objective of this qualitative study was to report on the experiences of carers of people with dysphagia (non-gastrostomy dependent) following nonsurgical treatment for HNC and to identify the support needs of this group. A purposive, maximum-variation sampling technique was adopted to recruit 12 carers of people treated curatively for HNC since 2007. Each participated in an in-depth interview, detailing their experience of caring for someone with dysphagia and the associated impact on their life. Thematic analysis was adopted to search the transcripts for key phases and themes that emerged from the discussions. Analysis of the transcripts revealed four themes: (1) dysphagia disrupts daily life, (2) carers make adjustments to adapt to their partner’s dysphagia, (3) the disconnect between carers’ expectations and the reality of dysphagia, and (4) experiences of dysphagia-related services and informal supports. Carers generally felt ill-prepared for their role in dysphagia management. The qualitative methodology successfully described the impact of dysphagia on the everyday lives of carers, particularly in regard to meal preparation, social events, and family lifestyle. Clinicians should provide adequate and timely training and support to carers and view carers as copartners in dysphagia management.
Deglutition Deglutition disorders Head and neck cancer Carers Qualitative research
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Cartmill B, Cornwell P, Ward E, Davidson W, Porceddu S. Long-term functional outcomes and patient perspective following altered fractionation radiotherapy with concomitant boost for oropharyngeal cancer. Dysphagia. 2012;27:481–90. doi:10.1007/s00455-012-9394-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molassiotis A, Rogers M. Symptom experience and regaining normality in the first year following a diagnosis of head and neck cancer: a qualitative longitudinal study. Palliat Support Care. 2013;10:197–204. doi:10.1017/S147895151200020X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner JL, McClement S, Lobchuk M, Daeninck P. Family members’ experiences caring for patients with advanced head and neck cancer receiving tube feeding: A descriptive phenomenological study. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2012;44:563–71. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal J, Dutta D, Palwe V, et al. Prospective subjective evaluation of swallowing function and dietary pattern in head and neck cancers treated with concomitant chemo-radiation. J Cancer Res Ther. 2010;6:15–21. doi:10.4103/0973-1482.63563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartmill B, Cornwell P, Ward E, Davidson W, Porceddu S. Swallowing, nutrition and patient-rated functional outcomes at 6 months following two non-surgical treatments for T1–T3 oropharyngeal cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2011;20:2073–81. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1316-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.Google Scholar
Van Manen M. Researching the lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: The Althouse Press; 1997.Google Scholar
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
Locher JL, Robinson CO, Bailey FA, et al. Disruptions in the organization of meal preparation and consumption among older cancer patients and their family caregivers. Psychooncology. 2009;19:967–74. doi:10.1002/pon.1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRenzo E. Ethical considerations in the dysphagia treatment and research: secular and sacred. In: Sonies B, editor. Dysphagia: a contiunum of care. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers; 1997. p. 91–106.Google Scholar
Glajchen M. The emerging role and needs of family caregivers in cancer care. J Support Oncol. 2004;2:145–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson K, Butow P, Hobbs KM, Hunt GE, Lo SK, Wain G. Assessing unmet supportive care needs in partners of cancer survivors: the development and evaluation of the Cancer Survivors’ Partners Unmet Needs measure (CaSPUN). Psychooncology. 2007;16:805–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar