Dysphagia

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 567–574 | Cite as

What is “Usual Care” in Dysphagia Rehabilitation: A Survey of USA Dysphagia Practice Patterns

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The scope of dysphagia rehabilitation has been expanding. Therapeutic approaches have begun to move away from the use of behavioral compensations and maneuvers only, toward a greater emphasis on research-supported exercise-based therapies. Given the change in focus and demand for evidence-based practice, this study surveyed licensed speech language pathologists who treat dysphagic adults to ascertain the utilization of exercise-based techniques and supportive research in treatment decision-making. A web-based survey was created using Qualtrics online software. The survey consisted of 29 questions on demographics and treatment options for a deidentified patient in a video-supported fictional scenario. Initially, a field test was conducted by sending the survey to a sample population of 12 local speech pathologists working in adult dysphagia rehabilitation. Responses were collated and analyzed for item agreement and internal consistency. A blast e-mail containing a link to the modified survey was then sent out to members of the American Speech Language Hearing Association Special Interest Group 13. Participants were given 2 months to complete the survey. A total of 254 responses were analyzed using descriptive, correlative, and associative methods. Respondents were experienced speech-language pathologists (SLP) working in primarily acute and rehabilitation settings and treating more than 50 dysphagic cases in a 6-month period. They reported treating dysphagic patients daily for an average of 30 min a session. Follow-up of treated patients was infrequent. Most respondents reported using self-developed assessment techniques, and as a group they recommended 47 different treatment techniques and more than 90 different treatment combinations for the same hypothetical patient case. The majority of respondents also described the common outcome of dysphagia treatment as returning a patient to a safe and functional oral diet, but not preinjury status. Results demonstrate a lack of uniformity in the treatment schemes and strategies used by SLP to treat dysphagic patients. The concept of “usual care practice” for dysphagia is not supported. Utilization of research-supported assessment techniques and exercise-based approaches was also sparse. These data clearly highlight ongoing challenges to professional education and growth in the area of dysphagia management.

Keywords

Dysphagia Survey Treatment Deglutition Deglutition disorders 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

All authors are free of professional areas of conflict of interest such as financial remuneration as employee, consultant, or subcontractor with companies.

References

  1. 1.
    Agency for Health Care Policy & Research. Diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders (dysphagia) in acute-care stroke patients. 1999. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/dysphsum.htm. Accessed 22 Oct 2012.
  2. 2.
    DeFabrizio ME, Rajappa A. Contemporary approaches to dysphagia management. J Nurse Pract. 2010;6(8):622–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garcia JM, Chambers E. Managing dysphagia through diet modifications. Am J Nurs. 2010;110(11):26–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Groher ME. Bolus management and aspiration pneumonia in patients with pseudo bulbar dysphagia. Dysphagia. 1997;1(4):215–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martens L, Cameron T, Simonesen M. Effects of a multidisciplinary management program on neurologically impaired patients with dysphagia. Dysphagia. 1990;5(3):147–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robbins J, Kays S, Gangnon RE, Hind J, Hewitt AL, Gentry LR, Taylor AJ. The effects of lingual exercise in stroke patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(2):150–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Troche MS, Okun MS, Rosenbek JC, Musson N, Fernandez HH, Rodrigues R, Sapienza CM. Aspiration and swallowing in Parkinson disease and rehabilitation with EMST: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2010;75(21):1912–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carnaby-Mann G, Crary MA. McNeill dysphagia therapy program: a case control study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(5):743–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carnaby-Mann G, Hankey GJ, Pizzi J. Behavioral intervention for dysphagia in acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:31–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martino R, Pron G, Diamant NE. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: surveying the practice patterns of the speech-language pathologist. Dysphagia. 2004;19:165–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mathers-Schmidt BA, Kurlinski M. Dysphagia evaluation practices: inconsistencies in clinical assessment and instrumental examination decision-making. Dysphagia. 2003;18:114–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melnyk B, Fineout Overholt E, Gallagher-Ford L, Kaplan L. The state of evidence-based practice in US nurses: Critical implications for nurse leaders and educators. J Nurs Adm. 2012;42(9):410–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Majid S, Foo S, Luyt B, Zhang X, Theng Y, Chang Y, Mokthar I. Adopting evidence-based practice in clinical decision making nurses’ perceptions, knowledge, and barriers. J Med Libr Assoc. 2011;99(3):229–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schulman CS. Strategies for starting a successful evidence-based practice program. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2008;19:301–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fitzgerald G, Wilson B, Semrau L. An interactive multimedia program to enhance teacher problem solving skills based on cognitive flexibility theory: design and outcomes. J Educ Multimedia Hypermedia. 1997;6:47–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral Science & Community HealthCollege of Public Health & Health Professions, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Communicative DisordersCollege of Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida Health Science CenterGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations