Dysphagia

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 427–435 | Cite as

Effects of Saliva on Starch-thickened Drinks with Acidic and Neutral pH

  • Ben Hanson
  • Ben Cox
  • Efstathios Kaliviotis
  • Christina H. Smith
Original Article

Abstract

Powdered maize starch thickeners are used to modify drink consistency in the clinical management of dysphagia. Amylase is a digestive enzyme found in saliva which breaks down starch. This action is dependent on pH, which varies in practice depending on the particular drink. This study measured the effects of human saliva on the viscosity of drinks thickened with a widely used starch-based thickener. Experiments simulated a possible clinical scenario whereby saliva enters a cup and contaminates a drink. Citric acid (E330) was added to water to produce a controlled range of pH from 3.0 to 7.0, and several commercially available drinks with naturally low pH were investigated. When saliva was added to thickened water, viscosity was reduced to less than 1% of its original value after 10–15 min. However, lowering pH systematically slowed the reduction in viscosity attributable to saliva. At pH 3.5 and below, saliva was found to have no significant effect on viscosity. The pH of drinks in this study ranged from 2.6 for Coca Cola to 6.2 for black coffee. Again, low pH slowed the effect of saliva. For many popular drinks, having pH of 3.6 or less, viscosity was not significantly affected by the addition of saliva.

Keywords

Saliva Amylase Viscosity Rheology Starch Thickener pH Deglutition Deglutition disorders 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was partly supported by an educational grant (Ref: Dept: 440000 Proj: 301253) by Fresenius-Kabi Ltd. to the first author.

References

  1. 1.
    Whelan K. Inadequate fluid intakes in dysphagic acute stroke. Clin Nutr. 2001;20(5):423–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Layne KA, Losinski DS, Zenner PM, Ament JA. Using the Fleming Index of dysphagia to establish prevalence. Dysphagia. 1989;4(1):39–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goulding R, Bakheit AMO. Evaluation of the benefits of monitoring fluid thickness in the dietary management of dysphagic stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:119–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finestone HM, Foley NC, Woodbury MG, Greene-Finestone L. Quantifying fluid intake in dysphagic stroke patients: a preliminary comparison of oral and nonoral strategies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1744–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kayser-Jones J, Schell ES, Porter C, Barbaccia JC, Shaw H. Factors contributing to dehydration in nursing homes: inadequate staffing and lack of professional supervision. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(10):1187–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis LA. Quality of life issues related to dysphagia. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2007;23:352–65.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, Wuttge-Hannig A, Ortega P. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002;17:139–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dantas RO, Kern MK, Massey BT, Dodds WJ, Kahrilas PJ, Brasseur JG, Cook IJ, Lang IM. Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:G675–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cichero JAY, Jackson O, Halley PJ, Murdoch BE. Which one of these is not like the others? An inter-hospital study of the viscosity of thickened fluids. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:537–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller JL, Watkin KL. The influence of bolus volume and viscosity on anterior lingual force during the oral stage of swallowing. Dysphagia. 1996;11:117–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Logemann JA, Gensler G, Robbins J, Lindblad AS, Brandt D, Hind JA, Kosek S, Dikeman K, Kazandjian M, Gramigna GD, Lundy D, McGarvey-Toler S, Miller Gardner PJ. A randomized study of three interventions for aspiration of thin liquids in patients with dementia or Parkinson’s disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:173–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cichero JAY, Murdoch BE. Dysphagia: foundation, theory and practice. Chichester: Wiley; 2006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vaclavik VA, Christian EW. Essentials of food science. New York: Springer; 2008.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dewar RJ, Joyce MJ. The thixotropic and rheopectic behaviour of maize starch and maltodextrin thickeners used in dysphagia therapy. Carbohydr Polym. 2006;65:296–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dokic L, Jakovljevic J, Dokic P. Relation between viscous characteristics and dextrose equivalent of maltodextrins. Starch. 2004;56(11):520–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hall JE. Guyton and hall textbook of medical physiology. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2010.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harris M, Edgar M, Meghji S. Saliva: Its secretion, composition and functions. In: Clinical oral science. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heinzerling CI, Smit G, Dransfield E. Modelling oral conditions and thickness perception of a starch product. Int Dairy J. 2008;18:867–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Janssen AM, Terpstra ME, De Wijk RA, Prinz JF. Relations between rheological properties, saliva-induced structure breakdown and sensory texture attributes of custards. J Texture Stud. 2007;38:42–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ferry AL, Hort J, Mitchell JR, Lagarrigue S, Pamies BV. Effect of amylase activity on starch paste viscosity and its implications for flavor perception. J Texture Stud. 2004;35:511–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hanson B, O’Leary MT, Smith CH. The effect of saliva on the viscosity of thickened drinks, Dysphagia. doi: 10.1007/s00455-011-9330-8.
  22. 22.
    Lavelle CLB, editor. Applied physiology of the mouth. Bristol: John Wright and Sons Ltd; 1975.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    British Dietetic Association. National Descriptors for Texture Modification in Adults. Birmingham: BDA, 2009.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Leary M, Hanson B, Smith CH. Variation of the apparent viscosity of thickened drinks. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011;46(1):17–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Salimetrics LLC, Saliva Collection and Handling Advice. Available oat www.salimetrics.com. Accessed 1 May 2011.
  26. 26.
    Malkin AY. Rheology Fundamentals. Toronto: ChemTec Publishing, 1994 (www.chemtec.org).
  27. 27.
    Sharma F, Sherman P. Identification of stimuli controlling the sensory evaluation of viscosity. J Texture Stud. 1973;4:111–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sopade PA, Halley PJ, Cichero JAY, Ward LC. Rheological characterisation of food thickeners marketed in Australia in various media for the management of dysphagia. I: water and cordial. J Food Eng. 2007;79:69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    O’Leary M, Hanson B, Smith CH. Viscosity and non-Newtonian features of thickened fluids used for dysphagia therapy. J Food Sci. 2010;75:E330–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pelletier CA, Lawless HT. Effect of citric acid and citric acid–sucrose mixtures on swallowing in neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2003;18:231–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Desse M, Mitchell J, Wolf B, Budtova T. Droplet deformation and break-up under shear: hydrocolloid solution vs. suspension of starch granules. Food Hydrocolloids. 2011;25:495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sevón L, Laine MA, Karjalainen S, Doroguinskaia A, Helenius H, Kiss E, Lehtonen-Veromaa M. Effect of age on flow-rate, protein and electrolyte composition of stimulated whole saliva in healthy, non-smoking women. Open Dent J. 2008;2:89–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tylenda CA, Ship JA, Fox PC, Baum BJ. Evaluation of submandibular salivary flow rate in different age groups. J Dent Res. 1988;67(9):1225–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben Hanson
    • 1
  • Ben Cox
    • 1
  • Efstathios Kaliviotis
    • 2
  • Christina H. Smith
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Experimental & Computational Laboratory for the Analysis of Turbulence (ECLAT), Division of EngineeringKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Division of Psychology and Language ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations