, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 257–264 | Cite as

Predicting Aspiration After Hemispheric Stroke from Timing Measures of Oropharyngeal Bolus Flow and Laryngeal Closure

  • Maxine L. PowerEmail author
  • Shaheen Hamdy
  • John Y. Goulermas
  • Pippa J. Tyrrell
  • Ian Turnbull
  • David G. Thompson
Original Article


Deglutitive aspiration is common after stroke, affecting up to 50% of patients and predisposing them to pneumonia, yet it is virtually impossible to predict those patients at greatest risk. The aim of this study was to develop a robust predictive model for aspiration after stroke. Swallowing was assessed by digital videofluoroscopy (VF) in 90 patients following hemispheric stroke. Lesion characteristics were determined by computerized tomography (CT) brain scan using the Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Aspiration severity was measured using a validated penetration-aspiration scale. The probability of aspiration was then determined from measures of swallowing pathophysiology and lesion location by discriminant analysis. Aspiration was observed in 47 (52%) patients, yet despite disrupted swallowing physiology, intrasubject aspiration scores were variable. The best discriminant model combined pharyngeal transit time, swallow response time, and laryngeal closure duration to predict 73.11% of those aspirating (sensitivity = 66.54, specificity = 80.22, p > 0.001). The addition of lesion location did not add anything further to the predictive model. We conclude that the pathophysiology of poststroke aspiration is multifactorial but in most cases can be predicted by three key swallowing measurements. These measurements, if translatable into clinical bedside evaluation, may assist with the development of novel measurement and intervention techniques to detect and treat poststroke aspiration.


Aspiration Computerized tomography Deglutition Dysphagia Lesion location Videofluoroscopy Deglutition disorders 



The authors thank Ms. L. Renaut (Radiography, Salford Royal Hospital) and Dr A. Vail (Statistician, University of Manchester) for their invaluable assistance.


  1. 1.
    Horner J, Massey EW, Riski JE, Lathrop DL, Chase KN. Aspiration following stroke: clinical correlates and outcome. Neurology. 1988;38(9):1359–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barer DH. The natural history and functional consequences of dysphagia after hemispheric stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52(2):236–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing function after stroke: prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months. Stroke. 1999;30(4):744–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ding R, Logemann JA. Pneumonia in stroke patients: a retrospective study. Dysphagia. 2000;15(2):51–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perry L, Love CP. Screening for dysphagia and aspiration in acute stroke: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2001;16(1):7–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linden P, Kuhlemeier KV, Patterson C. The probability of correctly predicting subglottic penetration from clinical observations. Dysphagia. 1993;8(3):170–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alberts MJ, Horner J, Gray L, Brazer SR. Aspiration after stroke: lesion analysis by brain MRI. Dysphagia. 1992;7(3):170–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daniels SK, Brailey K, Foundas AL. Lingual discoordination and dysphagia following acute stroke: analyses of lesion localization. Dysphagia. 1999;14(2):85–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daniels SK, Foundas AL. Lesion localization in acute stroke patients with risk of aspiration. J Neuroimaging. 1999;9(2):91–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daniels SK, Foundas AL. The role of the insular cortex in dysphagia. Dysphagia. 1997;12(3):146–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin RE, Goodyear BG, Gati JS, Menon RS. Cerebral cortical representation of automatic and volitional swallowing in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85(2):938–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller AJ. In: Rosenbek JC, editor, The neuroscientific principles of swallowing and dysphagia. Dysphagia Series. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, 1999. p. 284.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pexman JH, Barber PA, Hill MD, Sevick RJ, Demchuk AM, Hudon ME, et al. Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(8):1534–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Logemann JA. Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1993.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenbek JC, Robbins J, Roecker EB, Coyle MA, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG. Pattern classification. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bland MJ, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rademaker AW, Pauloski BR, Colangelo LA, Logemann JA. Age and volume effects on liquid swallowing function in normal women. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41(2):275–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Power ML, Hamdy S, Singh S, Tyrrell PJ, Turnbull I, Thompson DG. Deglutitive laryngeal closure in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(2):141–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martino R, Terrault N, Ezerzer F, Mikulis D, Diamant NE. Dysphagia in a patient with lateral medullary syndrome: insight into the central control of swallowing. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(2):420–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lazareck LJ, Moussavi ZM. Classification of normal and dysphagic swallows by acoustical means. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51(12):2103–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vaiman M, Gabriel C, Eviatar E, Segal S. Surface electromyography of continuous drinking in healthy adults. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(1):68–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McKeown MJ, Torpey DC, Gehm WC. Non-invasive monitoring of functionally distinct muscle activations during swallowing. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113(3):354–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fraser C, Power M, Hamdy S, Rothwell J, Hobday D, Hollander I, et al. Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury. Neuron. 2002;34(5):831–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maxine L. Power
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Shaheen Hamdy
    • 3
  • John Y. Goulermas
    • 4
  • Pippa J. Tyrrell
    • 2
  • Ian Turnbull
    • 5
  • David G. Thompson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance ResearchUniversity of SalfordSalfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Stroke MedicineUniversity of Manchester SalfordUK
  3. 3.Department of Gastrointestinal SciencesUniversity of Manchester SalfordUK
  4. 4.Department of Electrical Engineering and ElectronicsUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  5. 5.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Manchester SalfordUK

Personalised recommendations