, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 325–335

Viscosity Measurements of Nectar- and Honey-thick Liquids: Product, Liquid, and Time Comparisons

  • Jane Mertz Garcia
  • Edgar ChambersIV
  • Ziad Matta
  • Megan Clark


This study compared the viscosity (thickness) of five different liquids thickened to nectar- or honey-like consistencies with a variety of thickening products. Samples were prepared using manufacturer guidelines and viscosity was measured at the recommended time to thicken (standard) and also after 10 and 30 min. Centipoise (cP) measurements of the samples were compared across products and within product lines for each level of thickness at all three time periods. Statistical analysis showed that the viscosity of a nectar- or honey-like liquid was highly dependent on the type of thickening product and the time it was allowed to thicken. Variability in viscosity measurements also was noted within a product line for thickening various liquids. Results are discussed in relation to the National Dysphagia Diet guidelines for nectar- and honey-like consistencies.


Thick liquids Viscosity Deglutition Deglutition disorders 


  1. 1.
    O’Gara JA: Dietary adjustments and nutritional therapy during treatment for oral-pharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia 4:209–212, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Logemann JA: Evaluation and Treatment of Swallowing Disorders, 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, 1998Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huckabee ML, Pelletier CA: Management of Adult Neurogenic Dysphagia. San Diego, CA: Singular, 1999Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamlet S, Choi J, Zormeier M, Shamsa F, Stachler R, Muz J, et al.: Normal adult swallowing of liquid and viscous material: Scintigraphic data on bolus transit and oropharyngeal residues. Dysphagia 11:41–47, 1996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crary MA, Groher ME: Introduction to Adult Swallowing Disorders. St. Louis, MO: Butterworth Heinemann, 2003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuhlemeier KV, Palmer JB, Rosenberg D: Effect of liquid bolus consistency and delivery method on aspiration and pharyngeal retention in dysphagia patients. Dysphagia 16:119–122, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glassburn DL, Deem JF: Thickener viscosity in dysphagia management: Variability among speech–language pathologists. Dysphagia 13:218–222, 1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mills RH: Rheology overview: Control of liquid viscosities in dysphagia management. Nutr Clin Pract 14:S52–S56, 1999Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Penman JP, Thomson M: A review of the textured diets developed for the management of dysphagia. J Hum Nutr Diet 11:51–60, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steele CM, Van Lieshout PH, Goff DH: The rheology of liquids: A comparison of clinicians’ subjective impressions and objective measurement. Dysphagia 18:182–195, 2003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pelletier CA: A comparison of consistency and taste of five commercial thickeners. Dysphagia 12:74–78, 1997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lotong V, Chun SS, Chambers E IV, Garcia JM: Texture and flavor characteristics of beverages containing commercial thickening agents for dysphagia diets. J Food Sci 68:1537–1521, 2003Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown A, Mills RH, Daubert CR, Casper ML: Establishing labels and standards for thickened liquids in the dysphagia diet. Consult Diet 23:2–5, 1998Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Macqueen CE, Taubert S, Cotter D, Stevens S, Frost GS: Which commercial thickening agent do patients prefer? Dysphagia 18:46–52, 2003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pelletier CA, Lawless HT: Measuring taste acceptance in neurologically impaired adults. Food Qual Pref 14:595–602, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whelan K: Inadequate fluid intakes in dysphagic acute stroke. Clin Nutr 20:423–428, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    National Dysphagia Task Force: National dysphagia diet: Standardization for optimal care. Chicago, IL: American Dietetic Association, 2002Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garcia JM, Chambers E, Matta Z, Clark M: Viscosity of Nectar & Honey-thick Liquids Measured at 3 Time Intervals. Poster session presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Chicago, 2003Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Akoh CC: Fat replacers. Food Technol 52:47–53, 1998Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mills RH: Evaluation of dysphagia in adults: Expanding the diagnostic options. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, 2000Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robbins JA, Nicosia M, Jind JA, Gill GD, Blanco R, Logemann JA: Defining physical properties of fluids for dysphagia evaluation and treatment. Perspectives on swallowing and swallowing disorders. Newslett Am Speech Lang Hear Assoc 11:16–20, 2002Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    American Society for Testing and Materials: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 14.03. West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM, 1991Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Whistler RL, BeMiller JN: Carbohydrate Chemistry for Food Scientists. St. Paul, MN: Eagan Press, 1997Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rao A: Rheology of Fluid and Semisolid Foods: Principles and Applications. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1999Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hoefler AC: Hydrocolloids: Practical Guides for the Food Industry. St. Paul, MN: Eagan Press, 2004Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thomas DJ, Atwel WA: Starches: Practical Guides for the Food Industry. St. Paul, MN: Eagan Press, 1999Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cichero JAY, Jackson O, Halley PJ, Murdoch BE: How thick is thick? Multicenter study of the rheological and material property characteristics of mealtime fluids and videofluoroscopy fluids. Dysphagia 15:188–200, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cichero JAY, Jackson O, Halley PJ, Murdoch BE: Which one of these is not like the others? An inter-hospital study of the viscosity of thickened liquids? J Speech Lang Hear Res 43:537–547, 2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Steffe JF: Rheological methods in food process engineering, 2nd ed. East Lansing, MI: Freeman Press, 1996Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane Mertz Garcia
    • 1
    • 3
  • Edgar ChambersIV
    • 2
  • Ziad Matta
    • 2
  • Megan Clark
    • 1
  1. 1.Communication Sciences & DisordersSchool of Family Studies & Human ServicesManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Sensory Analysis Center, Human NutritionKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  3. 3.Communication Sciences & DisordersSchool of Family Studies & Human Services, Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations