Advertisement

Dysphagia

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 101–113 | Cite as

McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment (MISA): Development and First Field Test of an Evaluation of Functional Ingestive Skills of Elderly Persons

  • Heather C. Lambert
  • Erika G. Gisel
  • Michael E. Groher
  • Sharon Wood–Dauphinee
Article

Abstract

There is a lack of reliable and valid clinical assessment tools for individuals with loss of ingestive skills. The McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment (MISA) was developed to facilitate the reliable and valid bedside assessment of elderly persons with feeding difficulties. Items were generated by a literature review and selected with the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team. The first version of the MISA comprised 190 items in 7 scales, covering the domains of medical history, mealtime environment, physical characteristics of the patient, food textures consumed, solid ingestion, liquid ingestion, and behaviors related to self-feeding. The first field test for item selection included 50 individuals, aged 60 years and older, living in the community, supervised housing, and long-term care centers. After field testing, 134 items were eliminated due to poor face validity, redundancy, or poor psychometric performance. The remaining 56 items were provided with 4 response categories and were reorganized into 5 scales. The revised version was field tested to determine its preliminary psychometric properties on 33 individuals, 60 years of age and older, residing in a long-term care center. Six items were eliminated due to redundancy after the second field test. Analyses of the revised version resulted in the elimination of another 6 items that were redundant or that demonstrated poor reliability. Internal consistency of all scales is ≥0.86 and interrater agreement is ≥0.92. These analyses suggest that the psychometric properties of the MISA are adequate for diagnosis and treatment planning. This supports its readiness for clinical use following further reliability and validity testing with a larger sample

Keywords

Dysphagia Clinical Feeding Neurologic impairment Psychometric properties Deglutition Deglutition disorders 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Dr. M. Abrahamowicz in the development of the project, data analysis, and in the preparation of this manuscript. This study was funded in part by a Health Canada NHRDP Fellowship, a REPAR Fellowship, a doctoral bursary from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Quebec, and a Canadian Occupational Therapy Foundation–Royal Canadian Legion Fellowship in Gerontology to H.L.

References

  1. 1.
    Siebens, H, Trupe, H, Siebens, A, Cook, F, Anshen, S, Hanauer, R, Oster, G 1986Correlates and consequences of eating dependency in institutionalized elderly.J Am Geriatr Soc34192198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Layne, KL 1990Feeding strategies for the dysphagic patient: A nursing perspective.Dysphagia58488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hudson, HM, Daubert, CR, Mills, RH 2000The interdependency of protein-energy malnutrition, aging, and dysphagia.Dysphagia153138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feinberg, MJ, Knebl, J, Tully, J 1996Prandial aspiration and pneumonia in an elderly population followed over 3 years.Dysphagia11104109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Croghan, JE, Burke, EM, Caplan, S, Denman, S 1994Pilot study of 12-month outcomes of nursing home patients with aspiration on videofluoroscopy.Dysphagia9141146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Logemann, JA 1983Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders.Pro-EdAustin, TXGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott, A, Perry, A, Bench, J 1998A study of interrater reliability when using videofluoroscopy as an assessment of swallowing.Dysphagia13223227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuhlemeier, KV, Yates, P, Palmer, JB 1998Intra- and interrater variation in the evaluation of videofluorographic swallowing studies.Dysphagia13142147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Groher, ME 1994Editorial: Determination of the risks and benefits of oral feeding.Dysphagia9233235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drinka, P, Voeks, S 1993Videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (letter)J Am Geriatr Soc411275Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ekberg, O, Feinberg, MJ 1991Altered swallowing function in elderly patients without dysphagia: Radiologic findings in 56 cases.Am J Radiol15611811184Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Groher, ME 1994The detection of aspiration and videofluoroscopy.Dysphagia9147148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lambert, HC, Gisel, EG 1996Assessment of oral, pharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia in elderly persons.Phys Occup Ther Geriatr14125Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agency for Health Care Policy and Research1999Diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders (dysphagia) in acute-care strokepatients summaryRockville, MD18Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feinberg, MJ 1997Editorial: Swallowing versus eating impairment in nursing home residents.Dysphagia1251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lambert, HC, Gisel, EG, Wood–Dauphinee, S 2001The functional assessment of dysphagia: Psychometric standards.Phys Occup Ther Geriatr19@15Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kenny, DJ, Koheil, RM, Greenberg, J, Reid, D, Milner, M, Moran, R, Judd, PL 1989Development of a multidisciplinary feeding profile for children who are dependent feeders.Dysphagia41628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parrott, LC, Selley, WG, Brooks, WA, Lethbridge, PC, Cole, JJ, Flack, FC, Ellis, RE, Tripp, JH 1992Dysphagia in cerebral palsy: A comparative study of the Exeter Dysphagia Assessment Technique and a multidisciplinary assessment.Dysphagia7209219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reilly, S, Skuse, D, Mathisen, B, Wolke, D 1995The objective rating of oral-motor functions during feeding.Dysphagia10177191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steele, CM, Greenwood, C, Ens, I, Robertson, C, Seidman–Carlson, R 1997Mealtime difficulties in a home for the aged: Not just dysphagia.Dysphagia124350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen, AY, Frankowski, R, Bishop–Leone, J, Hebert, T, Leyk, S, Lewin, J, Goepfert, H 2001The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: The M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg127870876PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McHorney, CA, Bricker, DE, Kramer, AE, Rosenbek, JC, Robbins, J, Chignell, KA, Logemann, JA, Clarke, C 2000The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: I. Conceptual foundation and item development.Dysphagia15115121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McHorney, CA, Bricker, DE, Robbins, J, Kramer, AE, Rosenbek, JC, Chignell, KA 2000The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling.Dysphagia15122133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McHorney, CA, Robbins, J, Lomax, K, Rosenbek, JC, Chignell, K, Kramer, AE, Bricker, DE 2002The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity.Dysphagia1797114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robbins, JA, Coyle, J, Rosenbek, J, Roecker, E, Wood, J 1999Differentiation of normal and abnormal airway protection during swallowing using the Penetration–Aspiration Scale.Dysphagia14228232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rosenbek, JC, Robbins, J, Roecker, EB, Coyle, JL, Wood, JL 1996A penetration–aspiration scale.Dysphagia119398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    WHO North American Collaborating Center1998ICIDH-2 Beta-1 field trial results.Canadian Institute for Health InformationOttawa, Canada119Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chamie, M 1990The status and use of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH).World Health Stat Q43273280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fucile, S, Wright, P, Chan, I, Yee, S, Langlais, M-E, Gisel, EG 1998Functional oral-motor skills: Do they change with age?Dysphagia13195201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nunnally, JC, Bernstein, IH 1994Psychometric theory.McGraw–HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Portney, LG, Watkins, MP 1993Validity of measurements.Norwalk, CT eds. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice.Appleton & LangeNorwalk, CT6986Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Curran, J, Groher, ME 1990Development and dissemination of an aspiration risk reduction diet.Dysphagia5612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    DeVellis, RF 1991Guidelines in scale development.Scale development: Theory and application.Sage PublishersLondon5190Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Streiner, DL, Norman, GR 1995Health measurement scales.Oxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wright, JG, Feinstein, AR 1992A comparative contrast of clinimetric and psychometric methods for constructing indexes and rating scales.J Clin Epidemiol4512011218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ferketich, S 1991Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis.Res Nurs Health14165168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ott, DJ, Peele, VN, Chen, YM, Gelfand, DW 1990Oropharyngeal function study: Radiologic means of evaluating swallowing difficulty.South Med J83191193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Splaingard, ML, Hutchins, B, Sulton, LD, Chaudhuri, G 1988Aspiration in rehabilitation patients: videofluoroscopy vs. bedside clinical assessment.Arch Phys Med Rehabil69637640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Perlman, AL, Lu, C, Jones, B 1997Radiographic contrast examination of the mouth, pharynx and esophagus.Perlman, ALSchulze–Delrieu, KS eds. Deglutition and its disorders: Anatomy, physiology, clinical diagnosis and management.Singular Publishing GroupSan Diego, CA153200Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schulze–Delrieu, KS, Miller, RM 1997Clinical assessment of dysphagia.Perlman, ALSchulze–Delrieu, KS eds. Deglutition and its disorders: Anatomy, physiology, clinical diagnosis and management.Singular Publishing GroupSan Diego, CA125152Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gisel, EG, Birnbaum, R, Schwartz, S 1998Helping the feeding impaired child.Recent Adv Paediatr165972Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bech, P 1999Methodological issues in individual quality of life assessment.Joyce, CRBMcGee, HMO'Boyle, CA eds. Individual quality of life: Approaches to conceptualisation and assessment.AmsterdamHarwood Academic Publishers5164Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fink, A 1995How to ask survey questions.SAGE PublicationsThousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Green, LW, Lewis, FR 1986Measurement and evaluation in health education and health promotion.Mayfield Publishing CompanyPalo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dekker, J 1995Application of the ICIDH in survey research on rehabilitation: The emergence of the functional diagnosis.Disabil Rehabil17195201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Keith, RA 1994Functional status and health status.Arch Phys Med Rehabil75478483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Roberts, L, Counsell, C 1998Assessment of clinical outcomes in acute stroke trials.Stroke29986991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    McFarlane, AC, Brooks, PM 1997The assessment of disability and handicap in musculoskeletal disease.J Rheumatol24985949PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Keith, RA 1995Conceptual basis of outcome measures.Am J Phys Rehabil747380Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Miller, RM, Groher, ME 1997General treatment of neurologic swallowing disorders,Groher, ME eds. Dysphagia: Diagnosis and management.Butterworth-HeinemannBoston223244Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather C. Lambert
    • 1
  • Erika G. Gisel
    • 1
  • Michael E. Groher
    • 2
  • Sharon Wood–Dauphinee
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Physical and Occupational TherapyMcGill University, Montreal, QuebecCanada
  2. 2.College of Health ProfessionsUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FloridaUSA

Personalised recommendations