Advertisement

A Crossing Lemma for Multigraphs

  • János Pach
  • Géza TóthEmail author
Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Let G be a drawing of a graph with n vertices and \(e>4n\) edges, in which no two adjacent edges cross and any pair of independent edges cross at most once. According to the celebrated Crossing Lemma of Ajtai, Chvátal, Newborn, Szemerédi and Leighton, the number of crossings in G is at least \(c\,{e^3\over n^2}\), for a suitable constant \(c>0\). In a seminal paper, Székely generalized this result to multigraphs, establishing the lower bound \(c\,{e^3\over mn^2}\), where m denotes the maximum multiplicity of an edge in G. We get rid of the dependence on m by showing that, as in the original Crossing Lemma, the number of crossings is at least \(c'{e^3\over n^2}\) for some \(c'>0\), provided that the “lens” enclosed by every pair of parallel edges in G contains at least one vertex. This settles a conjecture of Bekos, Kaufmann, and Raftopoulou.

Keywords

Crossing number Crossing Lemma Separator theorem Bisection width 

Mathematics Subject Classification

05C10 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Stefan Felsner, Michael Kaufmann, Vincenzo Roselli, Torsten Ueckerdt, and Pavel Valtr for their many valuable comments, suggestions, and for many interesting discussions during the Dagstuhl Seminar “Beyond-Planar Graphs: Algorithmics and Combinatorics”, November 6–11, 2016. We also want to thank Felix Schröder for his comments and for carefully reading our manuscript. János Pach: Supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grants 200021-165977 and 200020-162884 and Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics. Géza Tóth: Supported by National Research, Development and Innovation Office, NKFIH, K-111827 and Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics. This work is connected to the scientific program of the “Development of quality-oriented and harmonized R+D+I strategy and functional model at BME” project, supported by the New Hungary Development Plan (Project ID: TÁMOP-4.2.1/B-09/1/KMR-2010-0002).

References

  1. 1.
    Ajtai, M., Chvátal, V., Newborn, M.N., Szemerédi, E.: Crossing-free subgraphs. In: Theory and Practice of Combinatorics. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 60, pp. 9–12. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1982)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alon, N., Seymour, P., Thomas, R.: Planar separators. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 7(2), 184–193 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dey, T.L.: Improved bounds for planar $k$-sets and related problems. Discrete Comput. Geom. 19(3), 373–382 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Crossing number is NP-complete. SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods 4(3), 312–316 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaufmann, M.: Personal communication at the workshop “Beyond-Planar Graphs: Algorithmics and Combinatorics”. Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, November 6–11 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaufmann, M., Pach, J., Tóth, G., Ueckerdt, T.: The number of crossings in multigraphs with no empty lens. In: Proceedings of Graph Drawing 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (to appear)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leighton, F.T.: Complexity Issues in VLSI. Foundations of Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1983)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matoušek, J.: Lectures on Discrete Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 212. Springer, New York (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pach, J., Shahrokhi, F., Szegedy, M.: Applications of the crossing number. Algorithmica 16(1), 111–117 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pach, J., Spencer, J., Tóth, G.: New bounds on crossing numbers. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 124–133 (1999) (Also in: Discrete Comput. Geom. 24(4), 623–644 (2000))Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pach, J., Tóth, G.: Thirteen problems on crossing numbers. Geombinatorics 9(4), 199–207 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schaefer, M.: The graph crossing number and its variants: a survey. Electron. J. Comb. 1000, 21–22 (2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sharir, M., Agarwal, P.K.: Davenport–Schinzel Sequences and Their Geometric Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Székely, L.A.: Crossing numbers and hard Erdős problems in discrete geometry. Comb. Probab. Comput. 6(3), 353–358 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Székely, L.A.: A successful concept for measuring non-planarity of graphs: the crossing number. Discrete Math. 276(1–3), 331–352 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szemerédi, E., Trotter, W.T.: Extremal problems in discrete geometry. Combinatorica 3(3–4), 381–392 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Rényi InstituteHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Rényi InstituteHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Department of Mathematical AnalysisBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations