On Constant Factors in ComparisonBased Geometric Algorithms and Data Structures
Article
First Online:
 116 Downloads
Abstract
Many standard problems in computational geometry have been solved asymptotically optimally as far as comparisonbased algorithms are concerned, but there has been little work focusing on improving the constant factors hidden in bigOh bounds on the number of comparisons needed. In this paper, we consider orthogonaltype problems and present a number of results that achieve optimality in the constant factors of the leading terms, including Some of the results can be adapted to solve nonorthogonal problems, such as 2D convex hulls and general line segment intersection. Our algorithms and data structures use a variety of techniques, including Seidel and Adamy’s planar point location method, weighted binary search, and heightoptimal BSP trees.

an algorithm for the 2D maxima problem that uses \(n\lg h + O(n\sqrt{\lg h})\) comparisons, where \(h\) denotes the output size;

a randomized algorithm for the 3D maxima problem that uses \(n\lg h + O(n\lg ^{2/3} h)\) expected number of comparisons;

a randomized algorithm for detecting intersections among a set of orthogonal line segments that uses \(n\lg n + O(n\sqrt{\lg n})\) expected number of comparisons;

a data structure for point location among 3D disjoint axisparallel boxes that can answer queries in \((3/2)\lg n + O(\lg \lg n)\) comparisons;

a data structure for point location in a 3D box subdivision that can answer queries in \((4/3)\lg n + O(\sqrt{\lg n})\) comparisons.
Keywords
Comparisonbased algorithms Maxima Convex hull Line segment intersection Point location Binary space partitionReferences
 1.Afshani, P., Barbay, J., Chan, T.M.: Instanceoptimal geometric algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 129–138 (2009)Google Scholar
 2.Arya, S., Malamatos, T., Mount, D.M., Wong, K.C.: Optimal expectedcase planar point location. SIAM J. Comput. 37, 584–610 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 3.BenOr, M.: Lower bounds for algebraic computation trees. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 80–86 (1983)Google Scholar
 4.Bentley, J.L., Ottmann, T.A.: Algorithms for reporting and counting geometric intersections. IEEE Trans. Comput. C28(9), 643–647 (1979)Google Scholar
 5.Chan, T.M.: Optimal outputsensitive convex hull algorithms in two and three dimensions. Discrete Comput. Geom. 16, 361–368 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 6.Chan, T.M.: Outputsensitive results on convex hulls, extreme points, and related problems. Discrete Comput. Geom. 16, 369–387 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 7.Chan, T.M.: Klee’s measure problem made easy. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 410–419 (2013)Google Scholar
 8.Chan, T.M.: Persistent predecessor search and orthogonal point location on the word RAM. ACM Trans. Algorithms 9(3), 22 (2013)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 9.Chan, T.M., Chen, E.Y.: Multipass geometric algorithms. Discrete Comput. Geom. 37, 79–102 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 10.Chan, T.M., Pǎtraşcu, M.: Transdichotomous results in computational geometry, I: Point location in sublogarithmic time. SIAM J. Comput. 39, 703–729 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 11.Chan, T.M., Larsen, K.G., Pǎtraşcu, M.: Orthogonal range searching on the RAM, revisited. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 1–10 (2011)Google Scholar
 12.Chan, T.M., Snoeyink, J., Yap, C.K.: Primal dividing and dual pruning: Outputsensitive construction of 4d polytopes and 3d Voronoi diagrams. Discrete Comput. Geom. 18, 433–454 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 13.Chazelle, B., Dobkin, D.P.: Intersection of convex objects in two and three dimensions. J. ACM 34(1), 1–27 (1987)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 14.Chazelle, B., Matoušek, J.: Derandomizing an outputsensitive convex hull algorithm in three dimensions. Comput. Geom. Theory Appl. 5, 27–32 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
 15.Chazelle, B., Edelsbrunner, H., Guibas, L.J., Sharir, M.: Algorithms for bichromatic line segment problems and polyhedral terrains. Algorithmica 11, 116–132 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 16.Clarkson, K.L.: New applications of random sampling in computational geometry. Discrete Comput. Geom. 2, 195–222 (1987)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 17.Clarkson, K.L.: More outputsensitive geometric algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual IEEE Symposium Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 695–702 (1994)Google Scholar
 18.Clarkson, K.L., Shor, P.W.: Applications of random sampling in computational geometry. II. Discrete Comput. Geom. 4, 387–421 (1989)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 19.Cunto, W., Munro, J.I.: Average case selection. J. ACM 36, 270–279 (1989)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 20.Dobkin, D.P., Lipton, R.J.: On the complexity of computations under varying sets of primitives. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 18, 86–91 (1979)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 21.Dor, D., Zwick, U.: Selecting the median. SIAM J. Comput. 28, 1722–1758 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 22.Dor, D., Zwick, U.: Median selection requires \((2+\varepsilon )n\) comparisons. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 14, 312–325 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 23.Dubé, T.: Dominance rangequery: the onereporting case. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 208–217 (1993)Google Scholar
 24.Dumitrescu, A., Mitchell, J.S.B., Sharir, M.: Binary space partitions for axisparallel segments, rectangles, and hyperrectangles. Discrete Comput. Geom. 31, 207–227 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 25.Ford, L.R. jr., Johnson, S.M.: A tournament problem. Am. Math. Monthly 66, 387–389 (1959)Google Scholar
 26.Frederickson, G.N., Johnson, D.B.: The complexity of selection and ranking in \(X+Y\) and matrices with sorted rows and columns. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 24, 197–208 (1982)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 27.Golin, M.J.: A provably fast linearexpectedtime maximafinding algorithm. Algorithmica 11, 501–524 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 28.Gonnet, G.H., Munro, J.I.: Heaps on heaps. SIAM J. Comput. 15, 964–971 (1986)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 29.Graham, R.L.: An efficient algorithm for determining the convex hull of a finite planar set. Inf. Process. Lett. 1, 132–133 (1972)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
 30.Hershberger, J., Suri, S., Tóth, C.D.: Binary space partitions of orthogonal subdivisions. SIAM J. Comput. 34, 1380–1397 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 31.Jarvis, R.A.: On the identification of the convex hull of a finite set of points in the plane. Inf. Process. Lett. 2, 18–21 (1973)Google Scholar
 32.Kaligosi, K., Mehlhorn, K., Munro, J.I., Sanders, P.: Towards optimal multiple selection. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Colloquium Automata, Languages and Programming. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3580, pp. 103–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
 33.Kirkpatrick, D.G., Seidel, R.: Outputsize sensitive algorithms for finding maximal vectors. In: Proceedings of the 1st Annual ACM Symposium Computational Geometry, pp. 89–96 (1985)Google Scholar
 34.Kirkpatrick, D.G., Seidel, R.: The ultimate planar convex hull algorithm? SIAM J. Comput. 15, 287–299 (1986)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 35.Knuth, D.E.: Sorting and Searching. The Art of Computer Programming, vol. 3. AddisonWesley, Reading (1973)Google Scholar
 36.Kung, H.T., Luccio, F., Preparata, F.P.: On finding the maxima of a set of vectors. J. ACM 22, 469–476 (1975)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 37.Li, Z., Reed, B.A.: Heap building bounds. In: Proceedings of the 9th Workshop Algorithms Data Structures, vol. 3608, pp. 14–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
 38.Liotta, G., Preparata, F.P., Tamassia, R.: Robust proximity queries: an illustration of degreedriven algorithm design. SIAM J. Comput. 28(3), 864–889 (1998)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 39.Mehlhorn, K.: Data Structures and Algorithm 1: Sorting and Searching. EATCS Monographs on Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)Google Scholar
 40.Mulmuley, K.: Computational Geometry: An Introduction Through Randomized Algorithms. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
 41.Ottmann, T., Schuierer, S., Soundaralakshmi, S.: Enumerating extreme points in higher dimensions. In: Proceedings of the 12th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science. Lecture Notes on Computer Science, vol. 900, pp. 562–570. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
 42.Overmars, M.H., Yap, C.K.: New upper bounds in Klee’s measure problem. SIAM J. Comput. 20, 1034–1045 (1991)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 43.Paterson, M.S., Yao, F.F.: Optimal binary space partitions for orthogonal objects. J. Algorithms 13, 99–113 (1992)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 44.Preparata, F.P.: A new approach to planar point location. SIAM J. Comput. 10(3), 473–482 (1981)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 45.Preparata, F.P., Shamos, M.I.: Computational Geometry: An Introduction. Springer, New York (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 46.Seidel, R., Adamy, U.: On the exact worst case complexity of planar point location. J. Algorithms 37, 189–217 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 47.Tóth, C.D.: Binary space partitions: Recent developments. In: Combinatorial and Computational Geometry. MSRI Publications, vol. 52, pp. 525–552. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
 48.van Emde Boas, P.: On the \(\varOmega (n \log n)\) lowerbound for convex hull and maximal vector determination. Inf. Process. Lett. 10, 132–136 (1980)Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015