, Volume 80, Issue 11, pp 3050–3077 | Cite as

Bounded-Hop Communication Networks

  • Paz Carmi
  • Lilach Chaitman-Yerushalmi
  • Ohad Trabelsi


We study the problem of assigning transmission ranges to radio stations in the plane such that any pair of stations can communicate within a bounded number of hops h and the cost of the network is minimized. We consider two settings of the problem: collinear station locations and arbitrary locations. For the case of collinear stations, we introduce the pioneer polynomial-time exact algorithm for any \(\alpha \ge 1\) and constant h, and thus conclude that the 1D version of the problem, where h is a constant, is in \(\mathcal {P}\). Furthermore, we provide a 3 / 2-approximation algorithm for the case where h is an arbitrary number and \(\alpha =1\), improving the previously best known approximation ratio of 2. For the case of stations placed arbitrarily in the plane and \(\alpha =1\), we first present a \((1.5+ \varepsilon )\)-approximation algorithm for a case where a deviation of one hop (\(h+1\) hops in total) is acceptable. Then, we show a \((3+\varepsilon )\)-approximation algorithm that complies with the exact hop bound. To achieve that, we introduce the following two auxiliary problems, which are of independent interest. The first is the bounded-hop multi-sink range problem, for which we present a PTAS which can be applied to compute a \((1+\varepsilon )\)-approximation for the bounded diameter minimum spanning tree, for any \(\varepsilon >0\). The second auxiliary problem is the bounded-hop dual-sink pruning problem, for which we show a polynomial-time algorithm. To conclude, we consider the initial bounded-hop all-to-all range assignment problem and show that a combined application of the aforementioned problems yields the \((3+\varepsilon )\)-approximation ratio for this problem, which improves the previously best known approximation ratio of \(4(9^{h-2})/(\root h \of {2}-1)\).


Computational geometry Approximation algorithms Wireless networks 


  1. 1.
    Alt, H., Arkin, E.M., Brönnimann, H., Erickson, J., Fekete, S.P., Knauer, C., Lenchner, J., Mitchell, J.S.B., Whittlesey, K.: Minimum-cost coverage of point sets by disks. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, SOCG’06, pp. 449–458 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ambühl, C., Clementi, A.E.F., Penna, P., Rossi, G., Silvestri, R.: On the approximability of the range assignment problem on radio networks in presence of selfish agents. Theor. Comput. Sci. 343(1–2), 27–41 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arora, S., Raghavan, P., Rao, S.: Approximation schemes for euclidean k-medians and related problems. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, STOC’98, pp. 106–113 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Călinescu, G., Kapoor, S., Sarwat, M.: Bounded-hops power assignment in ad-hoc wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC’04, pp. 1494–1499 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chambers, E.W., Fekete, S.P., Hoffmann, H.F., Marinakis, D., Mitchell, J.S.B., Srinivasan, V., Stege, U., Whitesides, S.: Connecting a set of circles with minimum sum of radii. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures, WADS’11, pp. 183–194 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, J., Salim, M.B., Matsumoto, M.: Modeling the energy performance of object tracking in wireless sensor network using dual-sink. In: Proceedings of the 16th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications, APCC’10, pp. 204–209 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clementi, A.E.F., Di Ianni, M., Silvestri, R.: The minimum broadcast range assignment problem on linear multi-hop wireless networks. Theor. Comput. Sci. 1–3(299), 751–761 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clementi, A.E.F., Penna, P., Ferreira, A., Perennes, S., Silvestri, R.: The minimum range assignment problem on linear radio networks. Algorithmica 35(2), 95–110 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability; A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman & Co., Bedford (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gouvy, N., Elhafsi, E.H., Mitton, N., Zorbas, D.: Energy efficient multi-flow routing in mobile sensor networks. In: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC’13, pp. 1968–1973 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gruber, M., Raidl, G.R.: Solving the euclidean bounded diameter minimum spanning tree problem by clustering-based (meta-)heuristics. In: Revised Selected Papers of the 12th International Conference on Computer Aided Systems Theory, EUROCAST’09, pp. 665–672 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kantor, E., Peleg, D.: Approximate hierarchical facility location and applications to the bounded depth steiner tree and range assignment problems. J. Discrete Algorithms 7(3), 341–362 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laue, S., Matijevic, D.: Approximating k-hop minimum spanning trees in Euclidean metrics. Inf. Process. Lett. 107(3–4), 96–101 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lev-Tov, N., Peleg, D.: Exact algorithms and approximation schemes for base station placement problems. In: Proceedings of the 8th Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory, Turku, SWAT’02, pp. 90–99 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lev-Tov, N., Peleg, D.: Polynomial time approximation schemes for base station coverage with minimum total radii. Comput. Netw. 47(4), 489–501 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mitton, N., Simplot-Ryl, D., Zheng, J.: Guaranteed delivery in k-anycast routing in multi-sinkwireless networks. Trans. Mobile Commun. Appl. 3, e1 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pahlavan, K.: Wireless information networks. Wiley, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pellenz, M.E., Jamhour, E., Penna, M.C., Souza, R.D., de Oliveira Brante, G.G.: A power assignment method for multi-sink WSN with outage probability constraints. In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, AINA’14, pp. 533–540 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pouryazdanpanah, M.K., Anjomshoa, M., Salehi, A.S., Afroozeh, A., Moshfegh, M.G.: DS-VBF: dual sink vector-based routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor network. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium, ICSGRC’14, pp. 227–232 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sen, A., Das Gupta, M., De D.: Energy efficient layered cluster based hierarchical routing protocol with dual sink. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computers and Devices for Communication, CODEC 2012, pp. 1–4 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, X., Wang, J., Lu, K., Xu, Y.: GKAR: a novel geographic \({K}\)-anycast routing for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 24(5), 916–925 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu, X., Chen, G.: Dual-sink: using mobile and static sinks for lifetime improvement in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, ICCCN’07, pp. 1297–1302 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ben-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations