, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 195–224 | Cite as

Strict Self-Assembly of Fractals Using Multiple Hands

  • Cameron T. Chalk
  • Dominic A. Fernandez
  • Alejandro Huerta
  • Mario A. Maldonado
  • Robert T. Schweller
  • Leslie Sweet


In this paper we consider the problem of the strict self-assembly of infinite fractals within tile self-assembly. In particular, we provide tile assembly algorithms for the assembly of a Sierpinski triangle and the discrete Sierpinski carpet within a class of models we term the h-handed assembly model (h-HAM), which generalizes the 2-HAM to allow up to h assemblies to combine in a single assembly step. Despite substantial consideration, no purely growth self-assembly model has yet been shown to strictly assemble an infinite fractal without significant modification to the fractal shape. In this paper we not only achieve this, but in the case of the Sierpinski carpet are able to achieve it within the 2-HAM, one of the most well studied tile assembly models in the literature. Our specific results are as follows: We provide a 6-HAM construction for a Sierpinski triangle that works at scale factor 1, 30 tile types, and assembles the fractal in a near perfect way in which all intermediate assemblies are finite-sized iterations of the recursive fractal. We further assemble a Sierpinski triangle within the 3-HAM at scale factor 3 and 990 tile types. For the Sierpinski carpet, we present a 2-HAM result that works at scale factor 3 and uses 1216 tile types. We further include analysis showing that the aTAM is incapable of strictly assembling the Sierpinski triangle considered in this paper, and that multiple hands are needed for the near-perfect assembly of a Sierpinski triangle and the Sierpinski carpet.


Self-assembly Fractals DNA tiles 


  1. 1.
    Abel, Z., Benbernou, N., Damian, M., Demaine, E.D., Demaine, M.L., Flatland, R., Kominers, S.D., Schweller, R.T.: Shape replication through self-assembly and rnase enzymes. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1045–1064 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aggarwal, G., Cheng, Q., Goldwasser, M.H., Kao, M., de Espanés, P.M., Schweller, R.T.: Complexities for generalized models of self-assembly. SIAM J. Comput. 34(6), 1493–1515 (2005). doi: 10.1137/S0097539704445202 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barth, K., Furcy, D., Summers, S.M., Totzke, P.: Scaled tree fractals do not strictly self-assemble. In: Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation—13th International Conference, UCNC 2014, London, ON, Canada, July 14-18, 2014, Proceedings, pp. 27–39 (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08123-6_3
  4. 4.
    Cannon, S., Demaine, E.D., Demaine, M.L., Eisenstat, S., Patitz, M.J., Schweller, R.T., Summers, S.M., Winslow, A.: Two hands are better than one (up to constant factors): self-assembly in the 2ham vs. atam. In: 30th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2013, February 27–March 2, 2013, Kiel, Germany, pp. 172–184 (2013). doi: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2013.172
  5. 5.
    Carbone, A., Seeman, N.C.: A route to fractal dna-assembly. Nat. Comput. 1(4), 469–480 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, H., Doty, D.: Parallelism and time in hierarchical self-assembly. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2012, Kyoto, Japan, January 17–19, 2012, pp. 1163–1182 (2012).
  7. 7.
    Demaine, E., Patitz, M., Rogers, T., Schweller, R., Summers, S., Woods, D.: The two-handed tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal. In: Fomin, F., Freivalds, R., Kwiatkowska, M., Peleg, D. (eds.) Automata, Languages, and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7965, pp. 400–412. Springer, Berlin (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39206-1_34
  8. 8.
    Demaine, E.D., Demaine, M.L., Fekete, S.P., Ishaque, M., Rafalin, E., Schweller, R.T., Souvaine, D.L.: Staged self-assembly: nanomanufacture of arbitrary shapes with O (1) glues. Nat. Comput. 7(3), 347–370 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s11047-008-9073-0 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Demaine, E.D., Demaine, M.L., Fekete, S.P., Patitz, M.J., Schweller, R.T., Winslow, A., Woods, D.: One tile to rule them all: simulating any tile assembly system with a single universal tile. In: Automata, Languages, and Programming—41st International Colloquium, ICALP 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 8–11, 2014, Proceedings, Part I, pp. 368–379 (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-43948-7_31
  10. 10.
    Demaine, E.D., Patitz, M.J., Schweller, R.T., Summers, S.M.: Self-assembly of arbitrary shapes using rnase enzymes: meeting the kolmogorov bound with small scale factor (extended abstract). In: 28th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2011, March 10–12, 2011, Dortmund, Germany, pp. 201–212 (2011). doi: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2011.201
  11. 11.
    Doty, D.: Producibility in hierarchical self-assembly. In: Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation—13th International Conference, UCNC 2014, London, ON, Canada, July 14–18, 2014, Proceedings, pp. 142–154 (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08123-6_12
  12. 12.
    Doty, D., Patitz, M.J., Reishus, D., Schweller, R.T., Summers, S.M.: Strong fault-tolerance for self-assembly with fuzzy temperature. In: 51th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2010, October 23–26, 2010, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pp. 417–426 (2010). doi: 10.1109/FOCS.2010.47
  13. 13.
    Fu, B., Patitz, M.J., Schweller, R.T., Sheline, R.: Self-assembly with geometric tiles. In: Automata, Languages, and Programming—39th International Colloquium, ICALP 2012, Warwick, UK, July 9–13, 2012, Proceedings, Part I, pp. 714–725 (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31594-7_60
  14. 14.
    Furcy, D., Summers, S.M.: Scaled pier fractals do not strictly self-assemble. Computing Research Repository abs/1406.4197 (2014).
  15. 15.
    Kautz, S.M., Lathrop, J.I.: Self-assembly of the discrete sierpinski carpet and related fractals. In: DNA Computing and Molecular Programming, 15th International Conference, DNA 15, Fayetteville, AR, USA, June 8–11, 2009, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 78–87 (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10604-0_8
  16. 16.
    Kautz, S.M., Shutters, B.: Self-assembling rulers for approximating generalized sierpinski carpets. Algorithmica 67(2), 207–233 (2013). doi: 10.1007/s00453-012-9691-x MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lathrop, J.I., Lutz, J.H., Summers, S.M.: Strict self-assembly of discrete sierpinski triangles. Theor. Comput. Sci. 410(4–5), 384–405 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2008.09.062 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lutz, J.H., Shutters, B.: Approximate self-assembly of the sierpinski triangle. Theory Comput. Syst. 51(3), 372–400 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s00224-011-9345-4 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meunier, P., Patitz, M.J., Summers, S.M., Theyssier, G., Winslow, A., Woods, D.: Intrinsic universality in tile self-assembly requires cooperation. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2014, Portland, Oregon, USA, January 5–7, 2014, pp. 752–771 (2014). doi: 10.1137/1.9781611973402.56
  20. 20.
    Padilla, J.E., Patitz, M.J., Schweller, R.T., Seeman, N.C., Summers, S.M., Zhong, X.: Asynchronous signal passing for tile self-assembly: fuel efficient computation and efficient assembly of shapes. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 25(4), 459–488 (2014). doi: 10.1142/S0129054114400061 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patitz, M.J., Summers, S.M.: Self-assembly of discrete self-similar fractals. Nat. Comput. 9(1), 135–172 (2010). doi: 10.1007/s11047-009-9147-7 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Patitz, M.J., Summers, S.M.: Self-assembly of decidable sets. Nat. Comput. 10(2), 853–877 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s11047-010-9218-9 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rothemund, P.W., Papadakis, N., Winfree, E.: Algorithmic self-assembly of dna sierpinski triangles. PLoS Biol. 2(12), e424 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schweller, R.T., Sherman, M.: Fuel efficient computation in passive self-assembly. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2013, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, January 6–8, 2013, pp. 1513–1525 (2013). doi: 10.1137/1.9781611973105.109
  25. 25.
    Wang, H.: Dominoes and the aea case of the decision problem. In: Computation, Logic, Philosophy, pp. 218–245. Springer, Berlin (1990)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Winfree, E.: Algorithmic self-assembly of dna. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Winfree, E., Bekbolatov, R.: Proofreading tile sets: error correction for algorithmic self-assembly. In: DNA Computing, 9th International Workshop on DNA Based Computers, DNA9, Madison, WI, USA, June 1–3, 2003, revised papers, pp. 126–144 (2003). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24628-2_13

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cameron T. Chalk
    • 1
  • Dominic A. Fernandez
    • 1
  • Alejandro Huerta
    • 1
  • Mario A. Maldonado
    • 1
  • Robert T. Schweller
    • 1
  • Leslie Sweet
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceThe University of Texas - Pan AmericanEdinburgUSA

Personalised recommendations