TOSCA-based container orchestration on Mesos

Two-phase deployment of cloud applications using container-based artifacts
  • Stefan KehrerEmail author
  • Wolfgang Blochinger
Special Issue Paper


Container virtualization evolved into a key technology for deployment automation in line with the DevOps paradigm. Whereas container management systems facilitate the deployment of cloud applications by employing container-based artifacts, parts of the deployment logic have been applied before to build these artifacts. Current approaches do not integrate these two deployment phases in a comprehensive manner. Limited knowledge on application software and middleware encapsulated in container-based artifacts leads to maintainability and configuration issues. Besides, the deployment of cloud applications is based on custom orchestration solutions leading to lock-in problems. In this paper, we propose a two-phase deployment method based on the TOSCA standard. We present integration concepts for TOSCA-based orchestration and deployment automation using container-based artifacts. Our two-phase deployment method enables capturing and aligning all the deployment logic related to a software release leading to better maintainability. Furthermore, we build a container management system, which is composed of a TOSCA-based orchestrator on Apache Mesos, to deploy container-based cloud applications automatically.


Container orchestration Two-phase deployment TOSCA Container-based artifacts Apache Mesos DevOps 



This research was partially funded by the Ministry of Science of Baden-Württemberg, Germany, for the Doctoral Program ’Services Computing’.


  1. 1.
    Humble J, Molesky J (2011) Why enterprises must adopt devops to enable continuous delivery. Cut IT J 24(8):6Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Humble J, Farley D (2010) Continuous delivery: reliable software releases through build, test, and deployment automation. Addison-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wettinger J, Breitenbücher U, Kopp O, Leymann F (2016) Streamlining devops automation for cloud applications using tosca as standardized metamodel. Future Gener Comput Syst 56(C):317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kratzke N, Quint PC (2017) Understanding cloud-native applications after 10 years of cloud computing—a systematic mapping study. J Syst Softw 126:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pahl C, Brogi A, Soldani J, Jamshidi P (2017) Cloud container technologies: a state-of-the-art review. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput PP(99):1–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    OASIS (2013) Topology and orchestration specification for cloud applications (tosca) version 1.0, committee specification 01.
  7. 7.
    Burns B, Grant B, Oppenheimer D, Brewer E, Wilkes J (2016) Borg, omega, and kubernetes. Queue 14(1):10:70–10:93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hindman B, Konwinski A, Zaharia M, Ghodsi A, Joseph AD, Katz R, Shenker S, Stoica I (2011) Mesos: a platform for fine-grained resource sharing in the data center. In: Proceedings of the 8th USENIX conference on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI), USENIX, pp 295–308Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    OASIS (2016) Tosca simple profile in yaml version 1.0, committee specification 01.
  10. 10.
    Breitenbücher U, Binz T, Képes K, Kopp O, Leymann F, Wettinger J (2014) Combining declarative and imperative cloud application provisioning based on tosca. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on cloud engineering (IC2E). IEEE Computer Society, pp 87–96Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burns B, Oppenheimer D (2016) Design patterns for container-based distributed systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th USENIX conference on hot topics in cloud computing (HotCloud). USENIX, pp 108–113Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wettinger J, Breitenbücher U, Leymann F (2016) Streamlining APIfication by generating APIs for diverse executables using any2API. In: Helfert M, Méndez Muñoz V, Ferguson D (eds) Cloud computing and services science: 5th international conference, CLOSER 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, May 20–22, 2015, Revised Selected Papers, vol 581. Springer, Cham, pp 216–238. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29582-4_12
  13. 13.
    Peinl R, Holzschuher F, Pfitzer F (2016) Docker cluster management for the cloud—survey results and own solution. J Grid Comput 14(2):265–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kahn AB (1962) Topological sorting of large networks. Commun ACM 5(11):558–562CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wettinger J, Binz T, Breitenbücher U, Kopp O, Leymann F, Zimmermann M (2014) Unified invocation of scripts and services for provisioning, deployment, and management of cloud applications based on tosca. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on cloud computing and service science (CLOSER). SciTePress, pp 559–568Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kang H, Le M, Tao S (2016) Container and microservice driven design for cloud infrastructure devops. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on cloud engineering (IC2E). IEEE Computer Society, pp 202–211Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceReutlingen UniversityReutlingenGermany

Personalised recommendations