Manifest: The role of law in an electronic world dominated by Web 2.0

Article

Abstract

Web 2.0 has gained enormous momentum in recent years, and has reached most areas in entertainment, research, business, science, and beyond. It is characterized by a move from a read-only Web to a read-write Web, where users contribute content in a variety of forms. However, there is at the same time a host of legal issues arising for Web 2.0, visible via the huge number of law suits that have already been filed in this context. This paper tries to pinpoint core legal issues, the way they are so far treated, and what is needed for improving the situation.

Keywords

Web 2.0  User-generated content  Legal issues  Regulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ramakrishnan R, Tomkins A (2007) Towards a PeopleWeb. IEEE Comput 40(8):63–72Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berners-Lee T (2000) Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web. Harper Collins Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Musser J, O’Reilly T (2007) Web 2.0 Principles and Best Practices. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Reilly T (2005) What Is Web 2.0 – Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Available from www.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html (Accessed 5 Feb 2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vossen G, Hagemann S (2007) Unleashing Web 2.0 – From Concepts to Creativity. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman ThL (2005) The World is Flat – A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Witten IH, Frank E (2006) Data Mining – Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vise DA (2005) The Google Story – Inside the Hottest Business, Media and Technology Success of Our Time. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The Semantic Web – A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Sci. Amer., May 2001 issueGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Afuah A, Tucci CL (2003) Internet Business Models and Strategies, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis H (2006) Google Advertising Tools: Cashing in with Adsense, Adwords, and the Google APIs. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rymaszewski M, Au WJ, Wallace M, Winters C, Ondrejka C, Batstone-Cunningham B (2007) Second Life: The Official Guide. Wiley Publishing Inc., Indianapolis, INGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderson Ch (2006) The Long Tail. Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More. Hachette Book Group, Lebanon, Indiana. See also the following web page of Wired Magazine for a short article: www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail.html (Accessed 5 Feb 2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Battelle J (2005) The Search – How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture. Portfolio (Penguin Group), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Langville AN, Meyer CD (2006) Google’s PageRank and Beyond – The Science of Search Engine Rankings. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kappel G, Pröll B, Reich S, Retschitzegger W (eds) (2006) Web Engineering – The Discipline of Systematic Development of Web Applications. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Denning P, Horning J, Parnas D, Weinstein L (2005) Wikipedia risks. Commun ACM 48(12):152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rundle M, Conley Ch (eds) (2007) Ethical Implications of Emerging Technologies: A Survey. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoeren Th (2003) Eine kontraktualistische Konzeption der Informationsgerechtigkeit. Rechtstheorie 34:333–345Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eidenmüller H (1998) Effizienz als Rechtsprinzip, 2. Aufl. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoeren Th (1998) Internet und Recht – Neue Paradigmen des Informationsrechts. Neue Jur Wochenschr 39:2849–2854Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoeren Th (2002) Zur Einführung: Informationsrecht. Juristische Schulung 10:947Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cole M (2006) Medienrecht. In: Schiwy P, Schütz W, Dörr D (Hrsg) Medienrecht – Lexikon für Praxis und Wissenschaft, 4. Aufl. Carl Heymanns Verlag, Köln, S. 308Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eidenmüller H (2005) Der homo oeconomicus und das Schuldrecht. Juristenzeitung 5:216, 13:670Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lessig L (1995) The Path of Cyberlaw. Yale Law J 104:1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lessig L (2007) Code and other Laws of Cyberspace. Version 2.0, Basic BooksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Research Center for Information SystemsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations