Advertisement

Enhancement of tribromophenol removal in a sequencing batch reactor via submicron magnetite

  • Shu Ma
  • Jing WangEmail author
  • Ying Han
  • Fan Yang
  • Chen Gu
  • Fengbo Wang
Research Paper

Abstract

Conductive magnetite (Fe3O4) has been applied into some anaerobic bioprocesses to accelerate direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET), however, Fe3O4 is usually dissolved by iron-reducing bacteria under anaerobic conditions, resulting in the loss of magnetite. Therefore, submicron magnetite particles were added to the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) to build a Fe3O4/SBR system, which could alleviate magnetite dissolution and simultaneously remove tribromophenol (TBP) effectively. The average removal efficiencies of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and TBP in Fe3O4/SBR system were 81% and 91%, respectively, which were 51% and 18% higher than those of the control group without Fe3O4 (SBR system). The enhanced TBP biodegradation was likely related to potential DIET, which was supported by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, the increase of dehydrogenase and heme c (fivefold and 1.7-fold), and the enrichment of iron-redoxing bacteria (Geobacter and Thiobacillus). Furthermore, magnetite mainly remained intact in structure as indicated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), which might be ascribed to in situ iron redox cycle and magnetite biosynthesis via Magnetospirillum. Notably, the content of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radical (⋅OH) in Fe3O4/SBR system was 4–5 times higher than that of SBR system. These findings could provide insights into the development of cost-effective strategy for the removal of refractory organic pollutants.

Keywords

Tribromophenol wastewater Submicron magnetite SBR DIET Fenton-like reaction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21876018) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT19LAB05).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

449_2020_2281_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (225 kb)
Supplementary file1 (PDF 225 kb)
449_2020_2281_MOESM2_ESM.tif (158 kb)
Supplementary file1 (TIF 158 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Sim WJ, Lee SH, Lee IS, Choi SD, Oh JE (2009) Distribution and formation of chlorophenols and bromophenols in marine and riverine environments. Chemosphere 77(4):552–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abrahamsson K, Klick S (1991) Degradation of halogenated phenols in anoxic natural marine sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 22:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ronen Z, Vasiluk L, Abeliovich A, Nejidat A (2000) Activity and survival of tribromophenol-degrading bacteria in a contaminated desert soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1643–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oberg K, Warman K, Oberg T (2002) Distribution and levels of brominated flame retardants in sewage sludge. Chemosphere 48:805–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hassenklöver T, Predehl S, Pilli J (2006) Bromophenols, both present in marine organisms and in industrial flame retardants, disturb cellular Ca2+ signaling in neuroendocrine cells (PC12). Aquat Toxicol 76(1):37–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jia HZ, Wang CY (2015) Dechlorination of chlorinated phenols by sub-nanoscale Pdo/Feo intercalated in smectite: pathway, reactivity, and selectivity. J Hazard Mater 300:779–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang BB, Qian WT, Yu CT, Wang T, Zeng GM, Lei C (2016) Effective catalytic hydrode-chlorination of o-, p- and m-chloronitrobenzene over Ni/Fe nanoparticles: effects of experimental parameter and molecule structure on the reduction kinetics and mechanisms. Chem Eng J 306:607–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ríos JC, Repetto G, Jos A (2003) Tribromophenol induces the differentiation of SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro 17(5):635–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Howe PD, Dobson S, Malcolm HM (2005) 2, 4, 6-Tribromophenol and other simple brominated phenols. WHO, IPCS Concise International Chemical Assessment Document (CICAD) 66, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao HX, Jiang JQ, Wang YL, Xie Q, Qu BC (2017) Phototransformation of 2, 4, 6-tribromophenol in aqueous solution: kinetics and photolysis products. J Environ Sci Health 52(1):45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gao B, Liu LF, Liu JD, Yang FL (2013) Photocatalytic degradation of 2, 4, 6-tribromophenol over Fe-doped ZnIn2S4: stable activity and enhanced debromination. Appl Catal B 129:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Igarashi M, Zhu Q, Sasaki M, Kodama R, Oda K, Fukushima M (2016) Catalytic oxidation of 2, 4, 6-tribromophenol using iron(III) complexes with imidazole, pyrazole, triazine and pyridine ligands. J Mol Catal A Chem 413:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goundena AN, Jonnalagadda SB, Singh S (2019) Debromination of 2, 4, 6-tribromophenol and bromate ion minimization in water by catalytic ozonation. J Water Process Eng 31:100893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brenner A, Mukmenev I, Abeliovich A, Kushmaro A (2006) Biodegradability of tetrabromobisphenol A and tribromophenol by activated sludge. Ecotoxicology 15:399–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boyle AW, Phelps CD, Young LY (1999) Isolation from estuarine sediments of a desulfovibrio strain which can grow on lactate coupled to the reductive dehalogenation of 2, 4, 6-tribromophenol. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1133–1140PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Armeneate PM, Kafkewitz D, Lewandowski GA, Jou CJ (1999) Anaerobic-aerobic treatment of halogenated phenolic compounds. Water Res 33:681–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang SG, Liu XW, Zhang HY, Gong WX, Sun XF, Gao BY (2007) Aerobic granulation for 2, 4-dichlorophenol biodegradation in a sequencing batch reactor. Chemosphere 69(5):769–775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ronen Z, Abeliovich A (2000) Anaerobic-aerobic process for microbial degradation of tetrabromobisphenol A. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(6):2372–2377PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dolfing J, Beurskens JE (1994) The microbial logic and environmental significance of reductive dehalogenation. Adv Microb Ecol 14:143–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aulenta F, Catervi A, Majone M (2007) Electron transfer from a solid-state electrode assisted by methyl viologen sustains efficient microbial reductive dechlorination of TCE. Environ Sci Technol 41(7):2554–2559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aulenta F, Maio VD, Ferri T, Majone M (2010) The humic acid analogueantraquinone-2, 6-disulfonate (AQDS) serves as an electron shuttle in theelectricity-driven microbial dechlorination of trichloroethene to cis-dichloroethene. Bioresour Technol 101(24):9728–9733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang J, Fu Z, Liu G, Guo N, Lu H, Zhan Y (2013) Mediators-assisted reductive biotransformation of tetrabromobisphenol-A by Shewanella sp. XB. Bioresour Technol 142:192–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aulenta F, Rossetti S, Amalfitano S (2013) Conductive magnetite nanoparticles accelerate the microbial reductive dechlorination of trichloroethene by promoting interspecies electron transfer processes. Chemsuschem 6(3):433–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lovley DR (2017) Syntrophy goes electric: direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET). Annu Rev Microbiol 71(1):643–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee YJ, Lee DJ (2019) Impact of adding metal nanoparticles on anaerobic digestion performance-A review. Bioresour Technol 292:121926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baek G, Kim J, Lee CS (2016) A long-term study on the effect of magnetite supplementation in continuous anaerobic digestion of dairy effluent-enhancement in process performance and stability. Bioresour Technol 222:344–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ambuchi JJ, Zhang Z, Shan L, Liang D, Zhang P, Feng Y (2017) Response of anaerobic granular sludge to iron oxide nanoparticles and multi-wall carbon nanotubes during beet sugar industrial wastewater treatment. Water Res 117:87–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chinese NEPA (2002) Water and wastewater monitoring methods, 4th edn. Chinese Environmental Science Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhao L, Song T, Han D (2019) Hydrolyzed polyacrylamide biotransformation in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor system: key enzymes, functional microorganisms, and biodegradation mechanisms. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 42:941–951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Magoc T, Salzberg SL (2011) FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27(21):2957–2963PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7(5):335–336PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ma B, Wang S, Li Z (2017) Magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles induced effects on performance and microbial community of activated sludge from a sequencing batch reactor under long-term exposure. Bioresour Technol 225:377–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li Z, Yoshida N, Wang A (2015) Anaerobic mineralization of 2, 4, 6-tribromophenol to CO2, by a synthetic microbial community comprising clostridium dehalobacter and desulfatiglans. Bioresour Technol 176:225–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Falk HM, Reichling P, Andersen C (2015) Online monitoring of concentration and dynamics of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion processes with mid-infrared spectroscopy. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38:237–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cruz VC, Rossetti S, Fazi S (2014) Magnetite particles triggering a faster and more robust syntrophic pathway of methanogenic propionate degradation. Environ Sci Technol 48(13):7536–7543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shi L, Dong H, Reguera G (2016) Extracellular electron transfer mechanisms between microorganisms and minerals. Nat Rev Microbiol 14(10):651–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu F, Rotaru A, Shrestha PM (2015) Magnetite compensates for the lack of a pilin-associated c-type cytochrome in extracellular electron exchange. Environ Microbiol 17(3):648–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kato S, Hashimoto K, Watanabe K (2012) Methanogenesis facilitated by electric syntrophy via (semi)conductive iron-oxide minerals. Environ Microbiol 14(7):1646–1654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li H, Chang J, Liu P (2014) Direct interspecies electron transfer accelerates syntrophic oxidation of butyrate in paddy soil enrichments: syntrophic butyrate oxidation facilitated by nano-Fe3O4. Environ Microbiol 17(5):1533–1547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dieudonné A, Pignol D, Prévéral S (2019) Magnetosomes: biogenic iron nanoparticles produced by environmental bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnolo 103:3637–3649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lin W, Pan Y, Bazylinski DA (2017) Diversity and ecology of and biomineralization by magnetotactic bacteria. Environ Microbiol Rep 9:345–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Morita M, Malvankar NS, Franks AE (2011) Potential for direct interspecies electron transfer in methanogenic wastewater digester aggregates. MBio 2(4):00159–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xu L, Wang J (2012) Fenton-like degradation of 2, 4-dichlorophenol using Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles. Appl Catal B 123–124:117–126Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Voegelin A, Hug SJ (2003) Catalyzed oxidation of arsenic(III) by hydrogen peroxide on the surface of ferrihydrite: an in situ ATR2FTIR study. Environ Sci Technol 37(5):972–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang XM, Waite TD (2010) Iron speciation and iron species transformation in activated sludge membrane bioreactors. Water Res 44:3511–3521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Arinjay K, Shashi K, Surendra K (2005) Biodegradation kinetics of phenol and catechol using Pseudomonas putida MTCC 1194. Biochem Eng J 22(2):151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yazdanbakhsh AR, Rafiee M, Daraei H, Amoozegar MA (2019) Responses of flocculated activated sludge to bimetallic Ag-Fe nanoparticles toxicity: performance, activity enzymatic, and bacterial community shift. J Hazard Mater 366:114–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mun CH, Ng WJ, He JZ (2008) Acidogenic sequencing batch reactor start-up procedures for induction of 2, 4, 6-trichlorophenol dichlorination. Water Res 42(6–7):1675–1683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Song JX, Li L, Sheng FF, Guo CX, Zhang YM, Li ZY, Wang TL (2015) 2, 4, 6-Trichlorophenol mineralization promoted by anaerobic reductive dechlorination of acclimated sludge and extracellular respiration dechlorination pathway. Environ Sci 36(10):3764–3770Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shi L, Dai YZ, Luo CX, Tang WQ, Wang HY (2009) Characteristics of 2, 4, 6-trichlorophenol degradation by anaerobic microbe in the presence of element iron. Chin J Environ Eng 3(5):813–816Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Environmental Science and TechnologyDalian University of TechnologyDalianPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations