Advertisement

Agricultural waste materials enhance protease production by Bacillus subtilis B22 in submerged fermentation under blue light-emitting diodes

  • Punniyakotti Elumalai
  • Jeong-Muk Lim
  • Yool-Jin Park
  • Min ChoEmail author
  • Patrick J. Shea
  • Byung-Taek OhEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

Bacillus bacteria have major utility in large-scale production of industrial enzymes, among which proteases have particular importance. B. subtilis B22, an aerobic and chemotrophic strain, was isolated from kimchi and identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Extracellular protease production was determined in basic medium, with 1% (w/v) casein as substrate, by submerged fermentation at 37 °C under blue, green, red and white light-emitting diodes (LEDs), white fluorescent light and darkness. Fermentation under blue LEDs maximized protease production (110.79 ± 1.8 U/mL at 24 h). Various agricultural waste products enhanced production and groundnut oil cake yielded the most protease (334 ± 1.8 U/mL at 72 h). Activity and stability of the purified protease were optimum at pH 7–10 and 20–60 °C. Activity increased in the presence of Ca2+, Mg2+ and Mn2+, while Fe2+, Zn2+, Co2+ and Cu2+ moderated activity, and Ni2+ and Hg2+ inhibited activity. Activity was high (98%) in the presence of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) but inhibited by phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The protease was unaffected by nonionic surfactants, tolerated an anionic surfactant and oxidizing agents, and was compatible with multiple organic solvents. These properties suggest utility of protease produced by B. subtilis B22 under blue LEDs for industrial applications.

Keywords

Agricultural waste products Blue LEDs B. subtilis Protease Submerged fermentation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through Public Technology Program based on Environmental Policy, funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2018000200001).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

449_2019_2277_MOESM1_ESM.docx (231 kb)
Supplementary file1 (DOCX 231 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Blanco AS, Durive OP, Pérez BS, Montesa DZ, Guerra PN (2016) Simultaneous production of amylases and proteases by Bacillus subtilis in brewery wastes. Braz J Microbiol 47:665–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asoodeh A, Emtenani S, Emtenani S, Jalal R (2014) Enzymatic Molecular cloning and biochemical characterization of a thermoacidophilic, organic-solvent tolerant a-amylase from a Bacillus strain in Escherichia coli. J Mol Catal B Enzym 99:114–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2013.10.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farhadian S, Asoodeh A, Lagzian M (2015) Purification, biochemical characterization and structural modeling of a potential htrA-like serine protease from Bacillus subtilis DR8806. J Mol Catal B Enzym 115:51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2015.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Uttatree S, Charoenpanich J (2016) Isolation and characterization of a broad pH- and temperature-active, solvent and surfactant stable protease from a new strain of Bacillus subtilis. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 8:32–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2016.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lakshmi BKM, Muni Kumar D, Hemalatha KPJ (2018) Purification and characterization of alkaline protease with novel properties from Bacillus cereus strain S8. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 16:295–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.05.009 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    dos Santos Aguilar JG, Sato HH (2018) Microbial proteases: production and application in obtaining protein hydrolysates. Food Res Int 103:253–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.044 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hmidet N, Ali NEH, Haddar A, Kanoun S, Alya KS, Nasri M (2009) Alkaline proteases and thermostable α-amylase co-produced by Bacillus licheniformis NH1: characterization and potential application as detergent additive. Biochem Eng J 47:71–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2009.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ward OP, Rao MB, Kulkarni A (2009) Proteases, production. Encycl Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373944-5.00172-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parrado J, Rodriguez-Morgado B, Tejada M, Hernandez T, Garcia C (2014) Proteomic analysis of enzyme production by Bacillus licheniformis using different feather wastes as the sole fermentation media. Enzyme Microb Technol 57:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2014.01.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramachandran S, Singh SK, Larroche C, Soccol CR, Pandey A (2007) Oil cakes and their biotechnological applications—a review. Bioresour Technol 98:2000–2009.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.08.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hashemi M, Razavi SH, Shojaosadati SA, Mousavi SM, Khajeh K, Safari M (2010) Development of a solid-state fermentation process for production of an alpha amylase with potentially interesting properties. J Biosci Bioeng 110:333–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.03.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Castro RJS, Sato HH (2013) Synergistic effects of agro industrial wastes on simultaneous production of protease and α-amylase under solid state fermentation using a simplex centroid mixture design. Ind Crops Prod 49:813–821.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karataş H, Uyar F, Tolan V, Baysal Z (2013) Optimization and enhanced production of α-amylase and protease by a newly isolated Bacillus licheniformis ZB-05 under solid-state fermentation. Ann Microbiol 63:45–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0443-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sukumprasertsri M, Unrean P, Pimsamarn J, Kitsubun P, Tongta A (2013) Fuzzy logic control of rotating drum bioreactor for improved production of amylase and protease enzymes by Aspergillus oryzae in solid-state fermentation. J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:335–342.  https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1204.04038 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dar GH, Kamili AN, Nazir R, Bandh SA, Jan TR, Chishti MZ (2015) Enhanced production of α-amylase by Penicillium chrysogenum in liquid culture by modifying the process parameters. Microb Pathog 88:10–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2015.07.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robertson JB, Davis CR, Jhonson JH (2013) Visible light alters yeast metabolic rhythms by inhibiting respiration. PNAS 110:21130–21135.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313369110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Richert I (2014) The influence of light and water mass on bacterial population dynamics in the Amundsen Sea Polynya. Elem Sci Anth 3:000044.  https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davis SJ, Vener AV, Vierstra RD (1999) Bacteriophytochromes: Phytochrome-like photoreceptors from nonphotosynthetic eubacteria. Science 286:2517–2520.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5449.2517 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Losi A, Polverini E, Quest B, Gärtner W (2002) First evidence for phototropin-related blue-light receptors in prokaryotes. Biophys J 82:2627–2634.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75604-X CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gomelsky M, Hoff WD (2011) Light helps bacteria make important lifestyle decisions. Trends Microbiol 19:441–448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.05.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elumalai P, Park YJ, Min C, Shea PJ, Oh BT (2019) Red yeast rice fermentation with Bacillus subtilis B2 under blue light emitting diodes increases antioxidant secondary products. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 42:529–539.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-018-2056-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elumalai P, Lim JM, Park YJ, Min C, Shea PJ, Oh BT (2018) Enhanced amylase production by a Bacillus subtilis strain under blue light-emitting diodes. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 49:143–150.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2018.1550656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Margit Olle AV (2013) The effect of light-emitting diode lighting on greenhouse plant growth and quality. Agric Food Sci 22:223–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yi ZL, Huang WF, Ren Y, Onac E, Zhou GF, Pengb S, Wanga XJ, Li HH (2014) LED lights increase bioactive substances at low energy costs in culturing fruiting bodies of Cordyceps militaris. Sci Hortic 175:139–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morrow RC (2008) LED lighting in horticulture. Hort Sci 43:1947–1950.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5807-3_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Elumalai P, Parthipan P, Narenkumar J, Anandakumar B, Madhavan J, Oh BT, Rajasekar A (2019) Role of thermophilic bacteria (Bacillus and Geobacillus) on crude oil degradation and biocorrosion in oil reservoir environment. 3 Biotech 9:79.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1604-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Qureshi AS, Khushk I, Ali CH, Chisti Y, Ahmad A, Majeed H (2016) Coproduction of protease and amylase by thermophilic Bacillus sp. BBXS-2 using open solid-state fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 8:146–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2016.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (2010) In: Horwitz W (Ed) Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Agriculture Chemistry, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Salihi A, Asoodeh A, Aliabadian M (2017) Production and biochemical characterization of an alkaline protease from Aspergillus oryzae CH93. Int J Biol Macromol 94:827–835.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.06.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Acebal C, Castillon MP, Estrada P, Mata I, Costa E, Aguado J, Romero D, Jimenez F (1986) Enhanced cellulase production from Trichoderma reesei QM 9414 on physically treated wheat straw. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 24:218–233.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sathishkumar R, Ananthan G, Arun J (2015) Production, purification and characterization of alkaline protease by ascidian associated Bacillus subtilis GA CAS8 using agricultural wastes. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 4:214–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2014.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sankareswaran M, Anbalagan S, Prabhavathi P (2014) Optimization of production of an extracellular alkaline protease by soil isolated Bacillus species using submerged and solid-state fermentation with agricultural wastes. Afr J Microbiol Res 8:872–877.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.1273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee S, Lee J, Jin YI, Jeong JC, Chang YH, Lee Y, Jeong Y, Kima M (2017) Probiotic characteristics of Bacillus strains isolated from Korean traditional soy sauce. LWT Food Sci Technol 79:518–524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.08.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Deng A, Wu J, Zhang Y, Zhang G, Wen T (2010) Purification and characterization of a surfactant-stable high-alkaline protease from Bacillus sp. B001. Bioresour Technol 101:7100–7106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jain D, Pancha I, Mishra SK, Shrivastav A, Mishra S (2012) Purification and characterization of haloalkaline thermoactive, solvent stable and SDS-induced protease from Bacillus sp.: a potential additive for laundry detergents. Bioresour Technol 115:228–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.081 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Annamalai N, Rajeswari MV, Sahu SK, Balasubramanian T (2014) Purification and characterization of solvent stable, alkaline protease from Bacillus firmus CAS 7 by microbial conversion of marine wastes and molecular mechanism underlying solvent stability. Process Biochem 49:1012–1019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2014.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hadjidj R, Badis A, Mechri S, Eddouaouda K, Khelouia L, Annane R, El Hattab M, Jaouadi B (2018) Purification, biochemical, and molecular characterization of novel protease from Bacillus licheniformis strain K7A. Int J Biol Macromol 114:1033–1048.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.167 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jaouadi B, Ellouz-Chaabouni S, Rhimi M, Bejar S (2008) Biochemical and molecular characterization of a detergent-stable serine alkaline protease from Bacillus pumilus CBS with high catalytic efficiency. Biochimie 90:1291–1305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2008.03.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Demirkan E, Dincbas S, Sevinc N, Ertan F (2011) Immobilization of B. amyloliquefaciens α-amylase and comparison of some of its enzymatic properties with the free form. Rom Biotechnol Lett 16:6690–6701Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Saggu SK, Mishra PC (2017) Characterization of thermostable alkaline proteases from Bacillus infantis SKS1 isolated from garden soil. PLoS ONE 12:e0188724.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188724 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mokashe N, Chaudhari A, Patila U (2015) Optimal production and characterization of alkaline protease from newly isolated halotolerant Jeotgalicoccus sp. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 4:235–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2015.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kecha M, Benallaoua S, Touzel JP, Bonaly R, Duchiron F (2007) Biochemical and phylogenetic characterization of a novel terrestrial hyperthermophilic archaeon pertaining to the genus Pyrococcus from an Algerian hydrothermal hot spring. Extremophiles 11:65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-006-0010-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Joo HS, Kumar CG, Park GC, Paik SR, Chang CS (2003) Oxidant and SDS-stable alkaline protease from Bacillus clausii I-52: production and some properties. J Appl Microbiol 95:267–272.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01982.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jellouli K, Ghorbel-Bellaaj O, Ayed HB, Manni L, Agrebi R, Nasri M (2011) Alkaline-protease from Bacillus licheniformis MP1: purification, characterization and potential application as a detergent additive and for shrimp waste deproteinization. Process Biochem 46:1248–1256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2011.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Singh SK, Singh SK, Tripathi VR, Garg SK (2012) Purification, characterization and secondary structure elucidation of a detergent stable, halotolerant, thermoalkaline protease of Bacillus cereus SIU1. Process Biochem 47:1479–1487.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2012.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shah K, Mody K, Keshri J, Jha B (2010) Purification and characterization of a solvent, detergent and oxidizing agent tolerant protease from Bacillus cereus isolated from the Gulf of Khambhat. J Mol Catal B Enzym 67:85–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2010.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Punniyakotti Elumalai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jeong-Muk Lim
    • 2
  • Yool-Jin Park
    • 3
  • Min Cho
    • 2
    Email author
  • Patrick J. Shea
    • 4
  • Byung-Taek Oh
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.School of EnvironmentSouth China Normal University, University TownGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Division of Biotechnology, Advanced Institute of Environment and Bioscience, College of Environmental and Bioresource SciencesChonbuk National UniversityIksanSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Ecology Landscape Architecture-Design, College of Environmental and Bioresource SciencesChonbuk National UniversityIksanSouth Korea
  4. 4.School of Natural ResourcesUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations