Recombinase polymerase amplification combined with lateral flow dipstick for equipment-free detection of Salmonella in shellfish
- 109 Downloads
Salmonella is a major pathogen that causes acute foodborne outbreaks worldwide. Seafood, particularly shellfish, is a proven source of Salmonella spp. infection because many people prefer to eat it raw or lightly cooked. However, traditional identification methods are too time-consuming and complex to detect contamination of bacteria in the food chain in a timely manner, and few studies have aimed to identify Salmonella in shellfish early in the supply chain. We herein developed a method for rapid detection of Salmonella in shellfish based on the method of recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) combined with lateral flow dipstick (LFD), which targets the invasion gene A (invA). The RPA-LFD was able to function at 30–45 °C, and at the temperature of 40 °C, it only took 8 min of amplification to reach the test threshold of amplicons. The established method had both a good specificity and a sensitivity of 100 fg DNA per reaction (20 µL). Regarding practical performance, RPA-LFD performed better than real-time PCR. Another advantage of RPA-LFD is that it was capable of being performed without expensive equipments. Thus, RPA-LFD has potential for further development as a detection kit for Salmonella in shellfish and other foods under field conditions.
KeywordsRecombinase polymerase amplification Lateral flow dipstick Nucleic acid test Salmonella Shellfish
Authors would like to acknowledge the Ningbo Academy of Inspection and Quarantine for providing the Salmonella strain, DNAs of other serotypes of Salmonella and non-Salmonella organisms for this study, and their allowing us to finish assays of cultivating strains in the laboratory there. Authors also appreciated the assistance and guidance of the staff there. We thank LetPub (http://www.letpub.com) for their linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 7.Mąka Ł, Popowska M (2016) Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella spp. isolated from food. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig 67:343–358Google Scholar
- 10.EFSA ECDC. (2015) The European Union Summary Report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2014. EFSA J 13:4329Google Scholar
- 11.OzFoodNet Working Group (2012) Monitoring the incidence and causes of diseases potentially transmitted by food in Australia: annual report of the OzFoodNet network, 2010. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 36:E213–E241Google Scholar
- 13.Xiong D, Song L, Geng S, Tao J, An S, Pan Z, Jiao X (2016) One-step PCR detection of Salmonella Pullorum/Gallinarum using a novel target: the flagellar biosynthesis gene flhB. Front Microbiol 7:1863Google Scholar
- 17.Pablos C, Marugán J, Cristóbal S, Grieken Rv (2017) Implications of electrical impedance-based microbiological technology in pork meat processing industry for the rapid detection and quantification of Salmonella Spp. J Food Sci Eng 7:1–16Google Scholar
- 30.Murinda SE, Ibekwe AM, Zulkaffly S, Cruz A, Park S, Razak N, Paudzai FM, Ab Samad L, Baquir K, Muthaiyah K, Santiago B, Rusli A, S B (2014) Real-time isothermal detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli using recombinase polymerase amplification. Foodborne Pathog Dis 11:529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Faye O, Faye O, Soropogui B, Patel P, El Wahed AA, Loucoubar C, Fall G, Kiory D, Magassouba N, Keita S, Kondé MK, Diallo AA, Koivogui L, Karlberg H, Mirazimi A, Nentwich O, Piepenburg O, Niedrig M, Weidmann M, Sall AA (2015) Development and deployment of a rapid recombinase polymerase amplification Ebola virus detection assay in Guinea in 2015. Euro Surveill 20:S.1–9Google Scholar
- 44.Lee N, Kwon KY, Oh SK, Chang HJ, Chun HS, Choi SW (2014) A multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Bacillus cereus, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus in Korean ready-to-eat food. Foodborne Pathog Dis 11:574–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Guo H (2010) Study on rapid detection method by multiple PCR of four species animal food borne pathogenic bacteria. Master’s thesis, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Heilongjiang ProvinceGoogle Scholar
- 47.Lillis L, Lehman D, Singhal MC, Cantera J, Singleton J, Labarre P, Toyama A, Piepenburg O, Parker M, Wood R, Overbaugh J, Boyle DS (2014) Non-instrumented incubation of a recombinase polymerase amplification assay for the rapid and sensitive detection of proviral HIV-1 DNA. PLoS One 9:e108189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Hiroshi K, Jun K, Kumiko F, Kenichi H, Masayoshi I, Naomi F, Mika N, Shunichi O, Toshiya S, Kazushige T (2009) Simultaneous enrichment of Salmonella spp, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Listeria monocytogenes by single broth and screening of the pathogens by multiplex real-time PCR. Food Sci Technol Res 15:427–438Google Scholar
- 52.Ji YK, Lee JL (2016) Rapid detection of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis from eggs and chicken meat by real-time recombinase polymerase amplification in comparison with the two-step real-time PCR. J Food Saf 32:611–615Google Scholar