Skip to main content
Log in

Specific growth rate observer for the growing phase of a Polyhydroxybutyrate production process

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the specific growth rate estimation problem in a Polyhydroxybutyrate bioplastic production process by industrial fermentation. The kinetics of the process are unknown and there are uncertainties in the model parameters and inputs. During the first hours of the growth phase of the process, biomass concentration can be measured online by an optical density sensor, but as cell density increases this method becomes ineffective and biomass measurement is lost. An asymptotic observer is developed to estimate the growth rate for the case without biomass measurement based on corrections made by a pH control loop. Furthermore, an exponential observer based on the biomass measurement is developed to estimate the growth rate during the first hours, which gives the initial condition to the asymptotic observer. Error bounds and robustness to uncertainties in the models and in the inputs are found. The estimation is independent of the kinetic models of the microorganism. The characteristic features of the observer are illustrated by numerical simulations and validated by experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some other works use two-compartment models and define PHB and active biomass as fractions of the total biomass. To keep coherence with previous works [21, 22] and simplify the development of the observer algorithms this kind of definition is not used here.

  2. Note that when applying control laws like (6) the kinetic model is not required, thus resulting in a more robust control.

References

  1. Astrom KJ, Murray RM (2014) Feedback systems, an introduction for scientists and engineers, 2nd edn. Princenton University Press, Princenton and Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bastin G, Dochain D (1990) On-line estimation and adaptive control of bioreactors. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang DM (2003) The snowball effect in fed-batch bioreactions. Biotechnol Prog 19(3):1064–1070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chanprateep S (2010) Current trends in biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates. J Biosci Bioeng 110(6):621–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen CT (1995) Linear system theory and design, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cornet I, Dochain D, Ramsay B, Perrier M (1993) Adaptive linearizing inferential control of a PHB producing process. In: Control applications, Second IEEE conference on, vol 1, pp 481–485

  7. Cougnon P, Dochain D, Guay M, Perrier M (2011) On-line optimization of fedbatch bioreactors by adaptive extremum seeking control. J Process Control 21(10):1526–1532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. De Battista H, Picó J, Picó-Marco E (2006) Globally stabilizing control of fed-batch processes with haldane kinetics using growth rate estimation feedback. J Process Control 16(8):865–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Battista H, Picó J, Garelli F, Vignoni A (2011) Specific growth rate estimation in (fed-)batch bioreactors using second-order sliding observers. J Process Control 21(7):1049–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Battista H, Picó J, Garelli F, Navarro JL (2012) Reaction rate reconstruction from biomass concentration measurement in bioreactors using modified second-order sliding mode algorithms. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35(9):1615–1625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dias J, Serafim L, Lemos P, Reis M, Oliveira R (2005) Mathematical modelling of a mixed culture cultivation process for the production of polyhydroxybutyrate. Biotechnol Bioeng 92(2):209–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dochain D (2003) State and parameter estimation in chemical and biochemical processes: a tutorial. J Process Control 13(8):801–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dochain D (2003) State observers for processes with uncertain kinetics. Int J Control 76(15):1483–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Große-Uhlmann R, Bley T (1999) A modular approach to situation identification of the dynamics of bacterial populations synthesizing poly-\(\beta\)-hydroxybutyrate. Bioprocess Eng 21(3):191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guay M, Dochain D, Perrier M (2004) Adaptive extremum seeking control of continuous stirred tank bioreactors with unknown growth kinetics. Automatica 40(5):881–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lara-Cisneros G, Femat R, Dochain D (2014) An extremum seeking approach via variable-structure control for fed-batch bioreactors with uncertain growth rate. J Process Control 24(5):663–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee J, Lim HC, Hong J (1997) Application of nonsingular transformation to on-line optimal control of poly-\(\beta\)-hydroxybutyrate fermentation. J Biotechnol 55(3):135–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Luong J, Mulchandani A, Leduy A (1988) Kinetics of biopolymer synthesis: a revisit. Enzyme Microb Technol 10(6):326–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lyubenova V, Ignatova M, Novak M, Patarinska T (2007) Reaction rate estimators of fed-batch process for poly-\(\beta\)-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) production by mixed culture. Biotechnol Biotechnoll Equipment 21(1):113–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohanty A, Misra M, Drzal L (2002) Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. J Polym Environ 10(1–2):19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mozumder MSI, Goormachtigh L, Garcia-Gonzalez L, Wever HD, Volcke EIP (2014) Modeling pure culture heterotrophic production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB). Bioresour Technol 155:272–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mozumder MSI, Wever HD, Volcke EIP, Garcia-Gonzalez L (2014) A robust fed-batch feeding strategy independent of the carbon source for optimal polyhydroxybutyrate production. Process Biochem 49(3):365–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mulchandani A, Luong J, Leduy A (1988) Batch kinetics of microbial polysaccharide biosynthesis. Biotechnol Bioeng 32(5):639–646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mulchandani A, Luong J, Groom C (1989) Substrate inhibition kinetics for microbial growth and synthesis of poly-\(\beta\)-hydroxybutyric acid by alcaligenes eutrophus ATCC 17697. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 30(1):11–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Popova S (2006) On-line state and parameters estimation based measurements of the glucose in mixed culture system. Biotechnol Biotechno Equip 20(3):208–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Reddy C, Ghai R, Rashmi, Kalia VC (2003) Polyhydroxyalkanoates: an overview. Bioresour Technol 87(2):137–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Smets IY, Claes JE, November EJ, Bastin GP, Impe JFV (2004) Optimal adaptive control of (bio)chemical reactors: past, present and future. J Process Control 14(7):795–805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Villadsen J, Nielsen J, Lidén G (2011) Bioreaction engineering principles. Springer, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by UNLP, CONICET, ANPCyT and FWO. We specially thank Eng. Christopher Young for his contributions to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martín Jamilis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jamilis, M., Garelli, F., Mozumder, M.S.I. et al. Specific growth rate observer for the growing phase of a Polyhydroxybutyrate production process. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38, 557–567 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1295-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1295-1

Keywords

Navigation