Effect of separator and inoculum type on electricity generation and microbial community in single-chamber microbial fuel cells
- 517 Downloads
Single-chamber microbial fuel cell (SMFC)-I consisted of 4 separator-electrode assemblies (SEAs) with two types of cation exchange membrane (CEM: Nafion and CMI 7000) and an anion exchange membrane (AEM: AMI 7001). SMFC-II consisted of 4 SEAs with Nafion and three types of nonwoven fabric. SMFC-I and -II were inoculated with anaerobic digested and activated sludge, respectively, and operated under fed-batch mode. In SMFC I, AEM-SEA showed a maximum power density (PDmax). Nafion-SEA showed a PDmax in SMFC II, which was similar to that of Nafion–SEA of SMFC I. Although different bacteria were developed in SMFC-I (Deltaproteobacteria and Firmicutes) and SMFC-II (Gammaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria and Bacteroidetes), the inoculum type little affects electricity generation. Variations of pH and oxygen in biofilm have influenced microbial community structure and electricity generation according to the electrode and separator material. Although the electricity generation of non-woven fabric-SEA was less than that of Nafion-SEA, the use of non-woven fabrics is expected to reduce the construction and operating costs of MFCs.
KeywordsElectricity production Inoculum Nonwoven fabric Separator Single-chamber microbial fuel cell
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2010-0021758).
- 8.Choo YF, Lee J, Chang IS, Kim BH (2006) Bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells enriched with high concentrations of glucose and glutamate. J Microbiol Biotechnol 16:1481–1484Google Scholar
- 14.Imfeld G, Aragonés CE, Fetzer I, Mészáros É, Zeiger S, Nijenhuis I, Nikolausz M, Delerce S, Richnow HH (2010) Characterization of microbial communities in the aqueous phase of a constructed model wetland treating 1, 2-dichloroethene-contaminated groundwater. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 72:74–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar