Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 11–21 | Cite as

Calculation of the release of total organic matter and total mineral using the hydrodynamic equations applied to palm oil mill effluent treatment by cascaded anaerobic ponds

Original Paper

Abstract

Anaerobic treatment processes to remove organic matter from palm oil mill effluent (POME) have been used widely in Malaysia. Still the amounts of total organic and total mineral released from POME that may cause degradation of the receiving environment need to be verified. This paper proposes the use of the hydrodynamic equations to estimate performance of the cascaded anaerobic ponds (CAP) and to calculate amounts of total organic matter and total mineral released from POME. The CAP efficiencies to remove biochemical oxygen demands, chemical oxygen demands, total solids and volatile solids (VS) as high as 94.5, 93.6, 96.3 and 98.2 %, respectively, are estimated. The amounts of total organic matter and total mineral as high as 538 kg VS/day and 895 kg FS/day, respectively, released from POME to the receiving water are calculated. The implication of the proposed hydrodynamic equations contributes to more versatile environmental assessment techniques, sometimes replacing laboratory analysis.

Keywords

Cascaded anaerobic pond Hydrodynamic equation Palm oil mill effluent Total mineral Total organic matter 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper used the data from a report of the final-year project in civil and environmental engineering at Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Data and information provided by the university are greatly appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    Department of Environment (DOE) (2003) Malaysian experience in effluent control in the palm oil industry. DOE Publications, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohammad AW, Rahman RA, Wu TY (2004) Potential use of nano-filtration membranes for cleaner production. Proceeding, the second seminar on water management, 51–56Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yacob S, Shirai Y, Hassan MA, Wakisaka M, Subash S (2006) Start-up operation of semi-commercial closed anaerobic digester for palm oil mill effluent treatment. Process Biochem 41:962–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chin KK, Lee SW, Mohammad HH (1996) A study of palm oil mill effluent treatment using a pond system. Water Sci Technol 34:119–123Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmad M, Aliyu-Poiko M, Nik Norulaini AR, Hashim R, Ahmad A (2008) Use of micro-filtered recovered palm oil mill effluent sludge as fish feed ingredient for Nile tilapia. Proceeding of the international conference on environmental research and technology, 98–102Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sinnappa (1978) Study of palm oil mill waste effluent. J Malay Agri 51:261–272Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borja R, Banks CJ, Martin A, Khalfanoi B (1995) Anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent and condensation water wastes: an overall kinetic model for methane production and substrate utilization. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 13:87–95Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cassidy DP, Hirl PJ, Belia E (2008) Methane production from the soluble fraction of distillers’ dried grains with solubles in anaerobic sequencing batch reactors. Water Environ Res 80:570–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Creamer KS, Williams CM, Chen Y, Cheng JJ (2008) Implications of urine-to-feces ratio in the thermophilic anaerobic digestion of swine waste. Water Environ Res 80:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wood BJ, Pillai KR, Rajaratnam JA (1979) Palm oil mill effluent disposal on land. Agric Wastes 1:103–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pivelli RP, Günther WM, Matté GR, Razzolini MT, Cutolo SA, Martone-Rocha S, Peternella FA, Dória MC, Matté MH (2008) Sanitation assessment of wastewater treated by stabilization ponds for potential reuse in agricultural irrigation sanitation assessment. Water Environ Res 80:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chui HK, Fang HHP, Li YY (1994) Removal of formate form wastewater by anaerobic process. J Environ Eng 120:1308–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fang HHP, Li YY, Chui HK (1995) UASB treatment of wastewater with concentrated mixed VFA. J Environ Eng 122:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    American Public Health Association (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. APHA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oudin LC, Meybeck M, Roussel P (1999) Système d’Evaluation de la Qualité de l’Eau des Cours d’Eau. Rapport de Présentation SEQ-Eau (Version 1), Agence de l’eau Loire-Bretagne, FranceGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    International Law Book Services (ILBS) (2005) Akta Kualiti Alam Sekeliling 1974 (Akta 127) & Peraturan-peraturan dan Perintah-perintah. ILBS Publications, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang Y-J, Liao Q, Wang Y-Z, Zhu X, Li J (2011) Effects of flow rate and substrate concentration on the formation and H2 production of photosynthetic bacterial biofilms. Bioresour Technol 102:6902–6908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Agamuthu P, Tan EL, Shaifal AA (1986) Effect of aeration and soil inoculum on the composition of palm oil effluent. Agri Wastes 15:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    White JB (1978) Wastewater engineering, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Najafpour GD, Zinatizadeh AAL, Mohamed AR, Isa MH, Nasrollahzadeh H (2006) High-rate anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent in an up-flow anaerobic sludge-fixed film reactor. Process Biochem 41:370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boardman GD, McVeigh PJ (1997) Use of UASB technology to treat crap processing wastewaters. J Environ Eng 123:776–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nielsen AH, Thorkild HJ, Jes V (2008) Effects of pH and iron concentrations on sulfide precipitation in wastewater collection systems. Water Environ Res 80:380–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cysneiros D, Banks CJ, Heaven S, Karatzas KAG (2011) The role of phase separation and feed cycle length in leach beds coupled to methanogenic reactors for digestion of a solid substrate (Part 2): Hydrolysis, acidification and methanogenesis in a two-phase system. Bioresour Technol 102:7393–9400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schaefer SH, Sung S (2008) Retooling the ethanol industry: thermophilic anaerobic digestion of thin stillage for methane production and pollution prevention. Water Environ Res 80:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee JW, Houtman CJ, Kim HY, Choi IG, Jeffries TW (2011) Scale-up study of oxalic acid pretreatment of agricultural lignocellulosic biomass for the production of bioethanol. Bioresour Technol 102:7451–7456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zinatizadeh AAL, Mohamed AR, Mashitah MD, Abdullah AZ, Isa MH (2007) Characteristics of granular sludge developed in an up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed-film bioreactor treating palm oil mill effluent. Water Environ Res 79:833–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental and Water Resource Management, Water Research AllianceUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaJohor BahruMalaysia

Personalised recommendations