Advertisement

Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

, Volume 35, Issue 1–2, pp 85–92 | Cite as

Effect of crude glycerol-derived inhibitors on ethanol production by Enterobacter aerogenes

  • Sang Jun Lee
  • Sung Bong Kim
  • Seong Woo Kang
  • Sung Ok Han
  • Chulhwan Park
  • Seung Wook Kim
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, ethanol production from pure and crude glycerol using Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 29007 was evaluated under anaerobic culture conditions. Inhibitory effects of substrate concentrations, pH, and salt concentrations were investigated based on crude glycerol components. Ethanol production was performed with pure glycerol concentrations ranging from 5 to 30 g/L to evaluate the effects of substrate concentration and osmotic pressure. The consumed glycerol was 5–14.33 g/L, and the yield of ethanol was higher than 0.75 mol ethanol/mol glycerol after 24 h of cultivation. To evaluate the inhibitory effects of salts (NaCl and KCl), experiments were performed with 0–20 g/L of each salt. Inhibitory effects of salts were strongest at high salt concentrations. The inhibitory effect of pH was performed in the pH range 4–10, and cell growth and ethanol production were highest at pH 5–6. Also, ethanol production was slightly inhibited at low concentration of crude glycerol comparison with pure glycerol. However, significant inhibitory effects were not observed at 1.5 and 2% crude glycerol which showed higher ethanol production compared to pure glycerol.

Keywords

Glycerol Enterobacter aerogenes Ethanol production Inhibitory effect 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Core Environmental Technology Development Project for Next Generation funded by the Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea (No. 032-091-019). This research was also supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011-0005504) and Research Grant from Kwangwoon University (2012).

References

  1. 1.
    Galan MI, Bonet J, Sire R, Reneaume JM, Plesu AE (2009) From residual to useful oil: revalorization of glycerine from the biodiesel synthesis. Bioresour Technol 100:3775–3778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peters D (2007) Raw materials. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 105:1–30Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCoy M (2006) Glycerin surplus. Chem Eng News 84:7–8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Da Silva GP, Mack M, Contiero J (2009) Glycerol: a promising and abundant carbon source for industrial microbiology. Biotechnol Adv 27:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Homann T, Tag C, Biebl H, Deckwer WD, Schink B (1990) Fermentation of glycerol to 1, 3-propanediol by Klebsiella and Citrobacter strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang GL, Ma BB, Xu XL, Li C, Wang L (2007) Fast conversion of glycerol to 1,3-propanediol by new strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Biochem Eng J 37:256–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biebl H (2001) Fermentation of glycerol by Clostridium pasteurianum–batch and continuous culture studies. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27:18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rachman MA, Furutani Y, Nakashimada Y, Kakizono T, Nishino N (1997) Enhanced hydrogen production in altered mixed acid fermentation of glucose by Enterobacter aerogenes. J Ferment Bioeng 83:358–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ito T, Nakashimada Y, Senba K, Matsui T, Nishio N (2005) Hydrogen and ethanol production from glycerol-containing wastes discharged after biodiesel manufacturing process. J Biosci Bioeng 100:260–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heijnen JJ, Roels JA (1981) Macroscopic model describing yield and maintenance relationship in aerobic fermentation processes. Biotechnol Bioeng 23:739–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zeng AP, Ross A, Deckwer WD (1990) A method to estimate the efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation and biomass yield from ATP of a facultative anaerobe in continuous culture. Biotech Bioeng 36:965–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dharmadi Y, Murarka A, Gonzalez R (2006) Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol by Escherichia coli: a new platform for metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:821–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yazdani SS, Gonzalez R (2008) Engineering Escherichia coli for the efficient conversion of glycerol to ethanol and co-products. Metab Eng 10:340–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakashimada Y, Rachman MA, Kakizono T, Nishino N (2002) Hydrogen production of Enterobacter aerogenes altered by extracellular and intracellular redox states. Int J Hydrog Energy 27:1399–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Converti A, Perego P (2002) Use of carbon and energy balances in the study of the anaerobic metabolism of Enterobacter aerogenes at variable starting glucose concentrations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fabiano B, Perego P (2002) Thermodynamic study and optimization of hydrogen production by Enterobacter aerogenes. Int J Hydrog Energy 27:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu KO, Kim SW, Han SO (2010) Engineering of glycerol utilization pathway for ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour Technol 101:4157–4161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pirt SJ (1975) Principles of microbe and cell cultivation. Willey, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zeng AP, Biebl H, Deckwer WD (1990) Effect of pH and acetic acid on growth and 2, 3-butanediol production of Enterobacter aerogenes in continuous culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:485–489Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang C, Ma K, Xing XH (2009) Regulation of hydrogen production by Enterobacter aerogenes by external NADH and NAD. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:1226–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nagata S, Maekawa Y, Ikeuchi T, Wang YB, Ishida A (2002) Effect of compatible solutes on the respiratory activity and growth of Escherichia coli K-12 under NaCl stress. J Biosci Bioeng 94:384–389Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shkedy VC, Avi DY (1975) Betaine-induced stimulation of respiration at high osmolarities in a halotolerant bacterium. Biochem J 150:219–226Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jitrwung R, Yargeau V (2011) Optimization of media composition for the production of biohydrogen from waste glycerol. Int J Hydrog Energy. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.092
  24. 24.
    Thompson JC, He BB (2006) Characterization of crude glycerol from biodiesel production from multiple feedstocks. Appl Eng Agric 22:261–265Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biological EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.School of Life Science and BiotechnologyKorea UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Chemical EngineeringKwangwoon UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations